2023
The MDM2–p53 antagonist BI 907828 in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: results of a phase Ia, first-in-human, dose-escalation study
LoRusso P, Yamamoto N, Patel M, Laurie S, Bauer T, Geng J, Davenport T, Teufel M, Li J, Lahmar M, Gounder M. The MDM2–p53 antagonist BI 907828 in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: results of a phase Ia, first-in-human, dose-escalation study. Cancer Discovery 2023, 13: 1802-1813. PMID: 37269344, PMCID: PMC10401071, DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0153.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTreatment-related adverse eventsSolid tumorsDay 1Common treatment-related adverse eventsGrowth differentiation factor-15 levelsMDM2-p53 antagonistsManageable safety profileAdvanced solid tumorsDose-escalation studyDose-limiting toxicityMetastatic solid tumorsDose-dependent increaseIA/IBAdverse eventsSafety profilePreliminary efficacyDedifferentiated liposarcomaClinical investigationCommon gradePatientsRelated commentaryIssue featureTarget engagementAntitumor activityTumors
2022
Targeting the EIF2AK1 signaling pathway rescues red blood cell production in SF3B1-mutant myelodysplastic syndromes with ringed sideroblasts
Adema V, Ma F, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Thongon N, Montalban-Bravo G, Yang H, Peslak SA, Wang F, Acha P, Sole F, Lockyer P, Cassari M, Maciejewski JP, Visconte V, Ganan-Gomez I, Song Y, Bueso-Ramos C, Pellegrini M, Tan TM, Bejar R, Carew JS, Halene S, Santini V, Al-Atrash G, Clise-Dwyer K, Garcia-Manero G, Blobel GA, Colla S. Targeting the EIF2AK1 signaling pathway rescues red blood cell production in SF3B1-mutant myelodysplastic syndromes with ringed sideroblasts. Blood Cancer Discovery 2022, 3: 554-567. PMID: 35926182, PMCID: PMC9894566, DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0220.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeRed blood cell productionSF3B1-mutant myelodysplastic syndromesMDS-RSRinged sideroblastsBlood cell productionSF3B1 mutationsDevelopment of therapiesCell productionRed blood cellsRed blood cell maturationHematologic responseSignificant anemiaTransfusion dependencyIron overloadMDS subtypesElderly populationSide effectsBone marrowCell maturationIssue featurePatientsBlood cellsErythroid precursorsBlood cell maturationMutant IDH Inhibits IFNγ–TET2 Signaling to Promote Immunoevasion and Tumor Maintenance in CholangiocarcinomaMutant-IDH1 Promotes Immunoevasion in Cholangiocarcinoma
Wu M, Shi L, Dubrot J, Merritt J, Vijay V, Wei T, Kessler E, Olander K, Adil R, Pankaj A, Tummala K, Weeresekara V, Zhen Y, Wu Q, Luo M, Shen W, García-Beccaria M, Fernández-Vaquero M, Hudson C, Ronseaux S, Sun Y, Saad-Berreta R, Jenkins R, Wang T, Heikenwälder M, Ferrone C, Goyal L, Nicolay B, Deshpande V, Kohli R, Zheng H, Manguso R, Bardeesy N. Mutant IDH Inhibits IFNγ–TET2 Signaling to Promote Immunoevasion and Tumor Maintenance in CholangiocarcinomaMutant-IDH1 Promotes Immunoevasion in Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discovery 2022, 12: 812-835. PMID: 34848557, PMCID: PMC8904298, DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1077.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTumor maintenanceKetoglutarate-dependent enzymesDiscovery of mechanismsDNA demethylaseResponse genesCell-specific ablationCTLA4 blockadeMouse modelEnzyme inhibitsImmune checkpoint activationCytotoxic T-cell functionTumor cellsSuppression of CD8T-cell depletionIssue featureT cell activityT cell recruitmentT cell functionNew therapeutic strategiesInterferon γ expressionIsocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutationTET2Receptor 1Γ expressionInhibitor efficacyLive-Cell Imaging Shows Uneven Segregation of Extrachromosomal DNA Elements and Transcriptionally Active Extrachromosomal DNA Hubs in Cancer
Yi E, Gujar A, Guthrie M, Kim H, Zhao D, Johnson K, Amin S, Costa M, Yu Q, Das S, Jillette N, Clow P, Cheng A, Verhaak R. Live-Cell Imaging Shows Uneven Segregation of Extrachromosomal DNA Elements and Transcriptionally Active Extrachromosomal DNA Hubs in Cancer. Cancer Discovery 2022, 12: 468-483. PMID: 34819316, PMCID: PMC8831456, DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1376.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsExtrachromosomal DNA elementsDNA elementsUneven segregationRNA polymerase IILive-cell imagingPolymerase IIOffspring cellsGene transcriptionCell line modelsEcDNAsRandom segregationGenetic materialLiving cellsCopy numberLive cellsIndividual cellsTumor evolutionMitosisInheritance patternBreakpoint sequencesIssue featureTranscriptionFluorescent markersPatient tissuesCells
2021
Impact of HER2 heterogeneity on treatment response of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab
Filho OM, Viale G, Stein S, Trippa L, Yardley DA, Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Arteaga CL, Spring LM, Waks AG, Wrabel E, DeMeo MK, Bardia A, Dell'Orto P, Russo L, King TA, Polyak K, Michor F, Winer EP, Krop IE. Impact of HER2 heterogeneity on treatment response of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab. Cancer Discovery 2021, 11: candisc.1557.2020. PMID: 33941592, PMCID: PMC8598376, DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1557.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHER2-positive breast cancerHER2 heterogeneityBreast cancerEarly-stage HER2-positive breast cancerHER2-positive early-stage breast cancerTherapeutic resistancePathologic complete response rateEarly-stage breast cancerNeoadjuvant clinical trialsComplete response rateSubset of patientsHER2 therapyPretreatment biopsiesEvaluable casesCure rateT-DM1Trastuzumab emtansineClinical trialsTreatment strategiesTreatment responseTreatment selectionResponse rateRelated commentaryTherapyIssue featureGenetic Determinants of EGFR-Driven Lung Cancer Growth and Therapeutic Response In VivoTumor Suppressor Genes and EGFR-Driven Lung Adenocarcinoma
Foggetti G, Li C, Cai H, Hellyer JA, Lin WY, Ayeni D, Hastings K, Choi J, Wurtz A, Andrejka L, Maghini DG, Rashleigh N, Levy S, Homer R, Gettinger SN, Diehn M, Wakelee HA, Petrov DA, Winslow MM, Politi K. Genetic Determinants of EGFR-Driven Lung Cancer Growth and Therapeutic Response In VivoTumor Suppressor Genes and EGFR-Driven Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discovery 2021, 11: 1736-1753. PMID: 33707235, PMCID: PMC8530463, DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1385.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSuppressor geneKey tumor suppressorPutative tumor suppressor geneTumor suppressor geneSensitivity of EGFRTumor growthOncogenic contextTumor suppressorHuman EGFRGenetic determinantsKeap1 pathwayComplex genotypesTumor suppressor gene alterationsLung cancer growthGenesDeficient lung adenocarcinomaLung adenocarcinomaGenetic alterationsIssue featureStrong driverCancer growthEGFR inhibitorsKinase inhibitorsInactivationGene alterations
2020
CRISPR-GEMM Pooled Mutagenic Screening Identifies KMT2D as a Major Modulator of Immune Checkpoint Blockade
Wang G, Chow RD, Zhu L, Bai Z, Ye L, Zhang F, Renauer PA, Dong MB, Dai X, Zhang X, Du Y, Cheng Y, Niu L, Chu Z, Kim K, Liao C, Clark P, Errami Y, Chen S. CRISPR-GEMM Pooled Mutagenic Screening Identifies KMT2D as a Major Modulator of Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cancer Discovery 2020, 10: 1912-1933. PMID: 32887696, PMCID: PMC7710536, DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1448.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsImmune checkpoint blockadeCheckpoint blockadeCancer typesMajority of patientsRemarkable clinical efficacyFraction of patientsMajor modulatorComplex molecular landscapeMultiple cancer typesClinical efficacyICB responseImmune infiltrationTumor immunogenicityAntigen presentationMutation burdenMouse modelPatient stratificationMutant tumorsTumor microenvironmentIssue featurePatientsTumorsMolecular landscapeBlockadeCancerThe Genomic Landscape of Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Wander SA, Cohen O, Gong X, Johnson GN, Buendia-Buendia JE, Lloyd MR, Kim D, Luo F, Mao P, Helvie K, Kowalski KJ, Nayar U, Waks AG, Parsons SH, Martinez R, Litchfield LM, Ye XS, Yu C, Jansen VM, Stille JR, Smith PS, Oakley GJ, Chu QS, Batist G, Hughes ME, Kremer JD, Garraway LA, Winer EP, Tolaney SM, Lin NU, Buchanan SG, Wagle N. The Genomic Landscape of Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancer Discovery 2020, 10: 1174-1193. PMID: 32404308, PMCID: PMC8815415, DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1390.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntineoplastic AgentsBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCheckpoint Kinase 1Drug Resistance, NeoplasmExome SequencingFemaleGenomicsHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Receptors, SteroidRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesConceptsCyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitorsMetastatic breast cancerBreast cancerResistant tumorsHormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancerHormone receptor-positive breast cancerReceptor-positive breast cancerEstrogen receptor expressionCandidate resistance mechanismsWhole-exome sequencingPrecision-based approachesCDK4/6i resistanceMechanisms of resistanceReceptor expressionTherapeutic strategiesCDK4/6iTherapeutic opportunitiesPatient samplesTumorsIssue featurePatientsCancerAcquired ResistanceCancer cellsAlterations
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply