2024
Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe
Nemeth A, Canavan M, Zhan P, Udelsman B, Ely S, Wigle D, Martin L, Yang C, Boffa D, Dhanasopon A. Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe. JTCVS Open 2024, 20: 141-150. PMID: 39296459, PMCID: PMC11405986, DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.03.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNon-small cell lung cancerComplete pathologic responseSalvage lung resectionNational Cancer DatabaseLength of stayStages I-IVLung resectionOligo-progressionOverall survivalSalvage surgeryComplete resection (R0Comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment planHigher R0 resection rateCohort study of patientsInitiation of immunotherapyR0 resection rateTreated with immunotherapySalvage treatment optionMortality rateCell lung cancerLow patient morbidityMedian length of stayKaplan-Meier analysisMultidisciplinary treatment planStudy of patients
2019
Phase II multi-institutional study of nivolumab (Nivo), cabiralizumab (Cabira), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC).
Cohen D, Medina B, Du K, Coveler A, Manji G, Oberstein P, Perna S, Miller G. Phase II multi-institutional study of nivolumab (Nivo), cabiralizumab (Cabira), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: tps4163-tps4163. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps4163.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchStereotactic body radiotherapyImmune suppressionResection rateUnacceptable toxicityEfficacy of SBRTPhase II multi-institutional studySingle-arm phase II studyAdvanced unresectable pancreatic cancerArm phase II studyHigher R0 resection rateAdaptive immune suppressionImmune suppressive phenotypeM-CSFPD-1 blockadePhase II studyR0 resection rateStandard induction chemotherapyUnresectable pancreatic cancerSurgical resection rateAnti-tumor responseT cell populationsEfficacy of RTPlacement of fiducialsPre-clinical modelsMulti-institutional study
2010
Defining Venous Involvement in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
Chun YS, Milestone BN, Watson JC, Cohen SJ, Burtness B, Engstrom PF, Haluszka O, Tokar JL, Hall MJ, Denlinger CS, Astsaturov I, Hoffman JP. Defining Venous Involvement in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2010, 17: 2832-2838. PMID: 20725860, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1284-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsR0 resection ratePreoperative therapyPreoperative chemoradiationResection ratePancreatic adenocarcinomaVenous involvementBilateral narrowingUnilateral narrowingSurvival rateBorderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinomaBorderline resectable pancreatic cancerMargin-negative resection rateMedian overall survival rateHigher R0 resection rateImproved overall survivalResectable pancreatic cancerNegative lymph nodesMargin-negative resectionOverall survival rateResectable pancreatic adenocarcinomaSuperior mesenteric veinPreoperative computed tomographyType IIBackgroundPancreatic adenocarcinomaBorderline resectability
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply