2022
Ultrasound for Midgut Malrotation and Midgut Volvulus: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.
Nguyen HN, Navarro OM, Bloom DA, Feinstein KA, Guillerman RP, Munden MM, Sammer MBK, Silva CT. Ultrasound for Midgut Malrotation and Midgut Volvulus: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2022, 218: 931-939. PMID: 35107311, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.27242.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMidgut malrotationUse of ultrasoundMidgut volvulusNarrative reviewAJR Expert Panel Narrative ReviewUpper gastrointestinal seriesUse of USPediatric surgical emergencyImaging modalitiesFirst-line modalityPreferred imaging modalityBowel ischemiaGastrointestinal seriesSurgical emergencyMalrotationAccurate diagnosisVolvulusModalitiesDiagnosisUltrasound
2021
Standardized measurement of coronary inflammation using cardiovascular computed tomography: integration in clinical care as a prognostic medical device
Oikonomou EK, Antonopoulos AS, Schottlander D, Marwan M, Mathers C, Tomlins P, Siddique M, Klüner LV, Shirodaria C, Mavrogiannis MC, Thomas S, Fava A, Deanfield J, Channon KM, Neubauer S, Desai MY, Achenbach S, Antoniades C. Standardized measurement of coronary inflammation using cardiovascular computed tomography: integration in clinical care as a prognostic medical device. Cardiovascular Research 2021, 117: 2677-2690. PMID: 34450625, DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvab286.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdipose TissueAdiposityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCloud ComputingComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDecision Support TechniquesEnglandFemaleGermanyHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsOhioPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentTime FactorsYoung AdultConceptsFat attenuation indexPerivascular fat attenuation indexRisk factor-based modelCoronary artery inflammationClinical risk factorsFatal cardiac eventsCoronary artery diseaseCoronary inflammationRisk factorsFAI scorePlaque metricsCardiac eventsArtery inflammationAbsolute riskCoronary arteryClinical careNon-invasive detectionTraditional cardiovascular risk factorsPatient's absolute riskCardiovascular risk factorsFat compositionNet clinical benefitCardiovascular risk predictionDecision curve analysisFirst-line modality
2012
Assessment of Uterine Receptivity
Cakmak H, Taylor H. Assessment of Uterine Receptivity. 2012, 559-566. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_62.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEndometrial receptivityUterine receptivityPregnancy outcomesPolycystic ovary syndromeFirst-line investigationFirst-line modalityPerfect diagnostic toolIVF cyclesEndometrial biopsyEndometrial polypsOvary syndromeSubfertile womenEndometrial pathologyEndometrial liningGynecologic diseaseHistological datingGynecologic conditionsSuccessful pregnancyPregnancy rateSonographic parametersGold standardReproductive technologiesPregnancyUltrasonographyDiagnostic tool
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply