2024
MRI Breast Findings
Narasimhamurthy M, O’Brien S, Andrejeva L, Nayak A. MRI Breast Findings. 2024, 235-267. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-65711-5_9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMagnetic resonance imagingNon-mass enhancementBreast lesionsBreast magnetic resonance imagingPracticing pathologistsMagnetic resonance imaging findingsRadiologic-pathologic correlationBreast core biopsiesMalignant breast lesionsDiagnosing breast lesionsCore biopsyMRI findingsBreast biopsyImaging examinationsFalse-positive rateBiopsyResonance imagingLesionsBreastImaging techniquesPathologistsImage patterns
2023
Anonymizing Radiographs Using an Object Detection Deep Learning Algorithm.
Khosravi B, Mickley J, Rouzrokh P, Taunton M, Larson A, Erickson B, Wyles C. Anonymizing Radiographs Using an Object Detection Deep Learning Algorithm. Radiology Artificial Intelligence 2023, 5: e230085. PMID: 38074777, PMCID: PMC10698585, DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230085.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConvolutional neural networkDeep learning algorithmsDe-identificationLearning algorithmsDatasets of chest radiographsImage de-identificationComputer vision modelsTwo-pass approachImage processing algorithmsPrecision-recall curveSupervised learningTransfer learningVision modelsNeural networkData sharingProcessing algorithmsIdentifying informationTest setAlgorithmDecrease false-positive ratesHealth informationFalse-positive rateDatasetAccuracyPublic release
2020
Novel Approaches to Screening for Breast Cancer
Mann R, Hooley R, Barr R, Moy L. Novel Approaches to Screening for Breast Cancer. Radiology 2020, 297: 200172. PMID: 32897163, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200172.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer-related mortalityBreast cancer screeningCancer screeningMolecular breast imagingCancer-related mortalityScreening modalitiesBreast imagingDigital breast tomosynthesisAggressive treatmentScreening strategiesFalse-positive rateBreast cancerSpectral mammographyLiquid biopsyBreath testScreening testBreastBreast tomosynthesisScreeningMammographyNovel approaches
2010
Mitral valve–tricuspid valve distance as a sonographic marker of trisomy 21
Grace D, Eggers P, Glantz J, Ozcan T. Mitral valve–tricuspid valve distance as a sonographic marker of trisomy 21. Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology 2010, 35: 172-177. PMID: 20069681, DOI: 10.1002/uog.7538.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMitral valve-tricuspid valve distanceMarkers of trisomyGestational ageSonographic markersTrisomy 21Cardiac defectsLinear regression analysisGestational age-specific percentilesSecond-trimester sonographic markersEffect of gestational ageRetrospective case-control studyCases of trisomyValve distanceMultiple linear regression analysisRegression analysisCase-control studyAge-specific percentilesWeeks gestationControl fetusesSecond-trimesterTricuspid valveVentricular septumFalse-positive rateTrisomyFetuses
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply