2025
Patient-Reported Outcomes From Males Regarding Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROGRESS Registry
Loeb S, Keith S, Gross L, Hartman R, Beer T, Brierley K, Cheng H, Couvillon A, Dicker A, Friedman S, Gomella L, Karsh L, Kelly W, Lallas C, Leader A, Mann M, Mark J, Mille P, Paller C, Rana H, Sokolova A, Trabulsi E, Whang Y, Giri V. Patient-Reported Outcomes From Males Regarding Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROGRESS Registry. JCO Precision Oncology 2025, 9: e2500571. PMID: 40971753, PMCID: PMC12462908, DOI: 10.1200/po-25-00571.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPatient-reported outcomesGermline testingDecisional conflictPretest counselingPROGRESS registryCancer genetics knowledgeHereditary cancer riskFamily cancer historyDecisional conflict scoresHigher decisional conflictCovariate-adjusted modelsProstate cancerGenetic careCare deliveryCancer screeningPatient experienceCancer historyNon-HispanicCancer riskParticipant characteristicsBenefit scoreProstate cancer historyLinear regression modelsMultiple linear regression modelEnglish speaking males
2023
Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Designed for a Primary Care Setting
Schapira M, Hubbard R, Whittle J, Vachani A, Kaminstein D, Chhatre S, Rodriguez K, Bastian L, Kravetz J, Asan O, Prigge J, Meline J, Schrand S, Ibarra J, Dye D, Rieder J, Frempong J, Fraenkel L. Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Designed for a Primary Care Setting. JAMA Network Open 2023, 6: e2330452. PMID: 37647070, PMCID: PMC10469267, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30452.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLung cancer screeningPrimary care settingDecisional conflictClinical trialsCare settingsVeterans Affairs Medical CenterDecisional conflict scoresWeb-based patientAttention control interventionFuture implementation strategiesCurrent smokersSecondary outcomesSmoking historyPrimary outcomeCancer screeningRecruitment lettersMedical CenterMAIN OUTCOMEDecisional regretClinical practiceWest HavenControl groupKnowledge scoreControl interventionsLatino ethnicity
2020
Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial
Madden T, Holttum J, Maddipati R, Secura G, Nease R, Peipert J, Politi M. Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception 2020, 102: 339-345. PMID: 32771369, PMCID: PMC7821473, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.002.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
A Study to Assess the Feasibility of Implementing a Web‐Based Decision Aid for Birth after Cesarean to Increase Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in Ethnically Diverse Settings
Shorten A, Shorten B, Fagerlin A, Illuzzi J, Kennedy HP, Pettker C, Raju D, Whittemore R. A Study to Assess the Feasibility of Implementing a Web‐Based Decision Aid for Birth after Cesarean to Increase Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in Ethnically Diverse Settings. Journal Of Midwifery & Women's Health 2018, 64: 78-87. PMID: 30334330, DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12908.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsWeb-based decision aidHealth care providersDecision aid implementationCare providersDecisional conflict scoresDecision aidDiverse practice settingsDecision aid contentElectronic health recordsRoutine careVaginal birthBirth outcomesOutpatient settingBirth preferencesClinic workflowWomen's knowledgeCesareanDecisional conflictKnowledge scorePractice settingsAid usageAid useBirth choicesPregnancy decisionsHealth recordsImplementing an Internet‐based Decision Aid in Ethnically Diverse Prenatal Care Settings: Reducing Disparities through Shared Decision Making about Birth after Cesarean
Shorten A, Shorten B, Fagerlin A, Illuzzi J, Kennedy H, Pettker C, Raju D, Whittemore R. Implementing an Internet‐based Decision Aid in Ethnically Diverse Prenatal Care Settings: Reducing Disparities through Shared Decision Making about Birth after Cesarean. Journal Of Midwifery & Women's Health 2018, 63: 625-626. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12916.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMode of birthPrenatal care settingsPrevious cesareanCare settingsOutpatient clinic settingDecisional conflict scoresDecision aidWidespread clinical implementationElectronic health recordsHealth care decisionsVaginal birthBirth outcomesPregnant womenRepeat cesareanClinic settingCesareanWomen's knowledgeDecisional conflictCare decisionsDecision-making experiencesStudy designBirth optionsHealth recordsWomenClinical implementation
2010
Pilot testing of a decision support tool for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms
Berman L, Curry L, Goldberg C, Gusberg R, Fraenkel L. Pilot testing of a decision support tool for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal Of Vascular Surgery 2010, 53: 285-292.e1. PMID: 21067886, PMCID: PMC3058927, DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.08.075.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAttitude of Health PersonnelBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationChoice BehaviorConflict, PsychologicalConnecticutDecision Support Systems, ClinicalEndovascular ProceduresEvidence-Based MedicineFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionPatient SelectionPhysician-Patient RelationsPilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsConceptsAbdominal aortic aneurysmPercent of patientsTreatment optionsAortic aneurysmTreatment decisionsVascular surgery clinicDecisional conflict scoresDifficult treatment decisionsMean knowledge scoreCurrent outcome dataSurgical candidatesMedian timeSurgery clinicOpen surgeryHospital clinicPatient preferencesPatients' opinionsEndovascular surgeryOutcome dataPatientsDecisional conflictKnowledge scoreInformed consentSurgerySurgeons
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply