Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Ezenna C, Krishna M, Joseph M, Pereira V, Ramesh P, Ismayl M, Nanna M, Goldsweig A. Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2024 PMID: 39721936, DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContrast-induced acute kidney injuryMultivessel coronary artery diseaseFFR-guided CRCoronary artery diseaseComposite adverse eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionRandomized Controlled TrialsCardiac deathAdverse eventsMyocardial infarctionComplete revascularizationRecurrent myocardial infarction ratesMedian follow-up durationRisk ratioCoronary interventionStent thrombosisMeta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsControlled TrialsFFR-guided complete revascularizationFollow-up durationMeta-analysisAcute kidney injuryAll-cause deathCochrane CENTRAL databasesCulprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply