2024
Empathic disequilibrium in schizophrenia: An individual participant data meta-analysis
Shalev I, Shamay-Tsoory S, Montag C, Assaf M, Smith M, Eran A, Uzefovsky F. Empathic disequilibrium in schizophrenia: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Journal Of Psychiatric Research 2024, 181: 253-261. PMID: 39637716, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.045.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive empathySchizophrenia diagnosisEmotional empathyCognitive components of empathyComponents of empathyInterpersonal Reactivity IndexSocial cognitive constructsSchizophrenia phenomenologyPositive symptomsCognitive constructsEmpathy measuresSchizophreniaSocial difficultiesCognitive componentsEmpathyReactivity indexData Meta-AnalysisParticipant data meta-analysisMeta-analysisIndividual Participant Data Meta-AnalysisResponse surface analysisSymptomsIndividual-participant data meta-analysisStable indexInterpersonal
2023
“Don't [ruminate], be happy”: A cognitive perspective linking depression and anhedonia
Rutherford A, McDougle S, Joormann J. “Don't [ruminate], be happy”: A cognitive perspective linking depression and anhedonia. Clinical Psychology Review 2023, 101: 102255. PMID: 36871425, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102255.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive affectNegative affectSustained negative affectCognitive constructsCognitive theoryCognitive perspectiveLack of pleasureCognitive deficitsSpecific thoughtsIntervention effortsDifferent theoretical lensesAffectRuminationAnhedoniaDeficitsExtant literatureMemoryDepressionHallmark featureComputational modelingTheoretical lensesEnvironmental cuesLess focusDebilitating disorderCues
2022
Brain–phenotype models fail for individuals who defy sample stereotypes
Greene AS, Shen X, Noble S, Horien C, Hahn CA, Arora J, Tokoglu F, Spann MN, Carrión CI, Barron DS, Sanacora G, Srihari VH, Woods SW, Scheinost D, Constable RT. Brain–phenotype models fail for individuals who defy sample stereotypes. Nature 2022, 609: 109-118. PMID: 36002572, PMCID: PMC9433326, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05118-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBrain-phenotype relationshipsBrain functional organizationCognitive constructsIndividual differencesNeurocognitive measuresBrain activityNeurocognitive scoresStereotypical profileNeural targetsClinical interventionsNeural circuitsFunctional organizationIndividualsSuch relationshipsData-driven approachRelationshipStereotypes
2021
Decision-making ability, psychopathology, and brain connectivity
Moutoussis M, Garzón B, Neufeld S, Bach D, Rigoli F, Goodyer I, Bullmore E, Consortium N, Fonagy P, Jones P, Hauser T, Romero-Garcia R, St Clair M, Vértes P, Whitaker K, Inkster B, Prabhu G, Ooi C, Toseeb U, Widmer B, Bhatti J, Villis L, Alrumaithi A, Birt S, Bowler A, Cleridou K, Dadabhoy H, Davies E, Firkins A, Granville S, Harding E, Hopkins A, Isaacs D, King J, Kokorikou D, Maurice C, McIntosh C, Memarzia J, Mills H, O’Donnell C, Pantaleone S, Scott J, Fearon P, Suckling J, van Harmelen A, Kievit R, Guitart-Masip M, Dolan R. Decision-making ability, psychopathology, and brain connectivity. Neuron 2021, 109: 2025-2040.e7. PMID: 34019810, PMCID: PMC8221811, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.019.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAffectAntisocial Personality DisorderAnxietyBrainCognitionDecision MakingDepressionDepressive Disorder, MajorFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansIntelligence TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsPsychosocial FunctioningSelf ConceptSocial InteractionYoung AdultConceptsDecision-making abilityFunctional connectivityResting-state functional connectivityGeneral social functioningDecision-making measuresPoor social functionCognitive constructsCognitive processesBrain signaturesSocial functioningThought patternsBrain connectivityMental healthMultiple domainsSocial functionIQBrain dataCommon factorsYoung peopleConstructsIndividuals 18Neural networkConnectivityAbilityPsychopathology
2020
Voluntary control of auditory hallucinations: phenomenology to therapeutic implications
Swyer A, Powers AR. Voluntary control of auditory hallucinations: phenomenology to therapeutic implications. Schizophrenia 2020, 6: 19. PMID: 32753641, PMCID: PMC7403299, DOI: 10.1038/s41537-020-0106-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAuditory verbal hallucinationsNeural underpinningsVoice hearersField's current understandingCognitive constructsLittle systematic examinationVerbal hallucinationsConscious controlVoice hearingPsychosocial factorsAuditory hallucinationsVoluntary controlDevelopment of controlHallucinationsUnderpinningsHearerDegree of controlHealth statusSystematic examinationDistressFunctioningPerceptionRecent workRelationshipConstructs
2017
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Association Between Third-Wave Cognitive Constructs and Youth Anxiety
Lønfeldt N, Silverman W, Esbjørn B. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Association Between Third-Wave Cognitive Constructs and Youth Anxiety. International Journal Of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy 2017, 10: 115-137. DOI: 10.1521/ijct.2017.10.2.115.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus Statements
2008
Mothering: Thinking is part of the job description: Application of cognitive views to understanding maladaptive parenting and doing intervention and prevention work
Azar S, Reitz E, Goslin M. Mothering: Thinking is part of the job description: Application of cognitive views to understanding maladaptive parenting and doing intervention and prevention work. Journal Of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008, 29: 295-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.04.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMaladaptive parentingCognitive viewCognitive science paradigmCognitive constructsCognitive perspectiveCognitive approachParental beliefsParentingParental responsesAdult female lifeChildren's riskDevelopmental workMaternal rolePrevention effortsJob descriptionsScience paradigmFuture directionsPrevention workInterventionApplied researchResearchBeliefsThinkingConstructsParadigmIdentifying Cognitive Mechanisms Targeted for Treatment Development in Schizophrenia: An Overview of the First Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Initiative
Carter CS, Barch DM, Buchanan RW, Bullmore E, Krystal JH, Cohen J, Geyer M, Green M, Nuechterlein KH, Robbins T, Silverstein S, Smith EE, Strauss M, Wykes T, Heinssen R. Identifying Cognitive Mechanisms Targeted for Treatment Development in Schizophrenia: An Overview of the First Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Initiative. Biological Psychiatry 2008, 64: 4-10. PMID: 18466880, PMCID: PMC2577821, DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBiomedical ResearchBrainCognition DisordersCooperative BehaviorDrug IndustryHumansNational Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)Neuropsychological TestsResearch Support as TopicSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationConceptsCognitive Neuroscience Treatment ResearchSchizophrenia (MATRICS) initiativeTreatment researchCognitive neuroscience fieldCNTRICS initiativeCognitive mechanismsCognitive constructsTreatment developmentNeuroscience fieldCognitive impairmentCognitionBasic animalSchizophreniaResearchFirst meetingImpairmentConstructsParadigmTranslational researchTranslation effortsNovel treatmentsOrganization
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply