Prognostic accuracy and clinical utility of psychometric instruments for individuals at clinical high-risk of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Oliver D, Arribas M, Radua J, Salazar de Pablo G, De Micheli A, Spada G, Mensi MM, Kotlicka-Antczak M, Borgatti R, Solmi M, Shin JI, Woods SW, Addington J, McGuire P, Fusar-Poli P. Prognostic accuracy and clinical utility of psychometric instruments for individuals at clinical high-risk of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry 2022, 27: 3670-3678. PMID: 35665763, PMCID: PMC9708585, DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01611-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrognostic accuracyClinical utilityCHR-P stateClinical utility analysisLongest available followFagan's nomogramPrevention of psychosisClinical samplesPost-test riskCHR-P criteriaGeneral population samplePsychometric instrumentsMean followPsychosis PreventionPrimary outcomeAvailable followAccurate prognosticationDiagnostic criteriaPsychotic disordersSystematic reviewPsychosis riskPsychosisNomogramPoor specificityPreventive capacity
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply