2023
STIMULUS-MDS2 design and rationale: a phase III trial with the anti-TIM-3 sabatolimab (MBG453) + azacitidine in higher risk MDS and CMML-2
Zeidan A, Giagounidis A, Sekeres M, Xiao Z, Sanz G, Van Hoef M, Ma F, Hertle S, Santini V. STIMULUS-MDS2 design and rationale: a phase III trial with the anti-TIM-3 sabatolimab (MBG453) + azacitidine in higher risk MDS and CMML-2. Future Oncology 2023, 19: 631-642. PMID: 37083373, DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1237.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeCMML-2Tim-3Hematopoietic stem cell transplantationT-cell immunoglobulin domainMucin domain 3Risk myelodysplastic syndromesPhase III trialsStem cell transplantationLeukemic stem cellsFavorable tolerabilityIII trialsNovel immunotherapiesPoor outcomeCell transplantationLeukemic blastsClinical trialsNovel therapiesMyelomonocytic leukemiaDurable benefitImmune systemMyeloid malignanciesMeaningful improvements
2022
MDS-476 Sabatolimab (MBG453) Combination Treatment Regimens for Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS): The Myelodysplastic Syndromes Studies in the STIMULUS Immuno-Myeloid Clinical Trial Program
Zeidan A, Al-Kali A, Borate U, Cluzeau T, DeZern A, Esteve J, Giagounidis A, Kobata K, Lyons R, Platzbecker U, Sallman D, Santini V, Sanz G, Sekeres M, Wei A, Xiao Z, Van Hoef M, Nourry-Boulot C, Sadek I, Ma F, Iordan A, Sabo J, Garcia-Manero G. MDS-476 Sabatolimab (MBG453) Combination Treatment Regimens for Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS): The Myelodysplastic Syndromes Studies in the STIMULUS Immuno-Myeloid Clinical Trial Program. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2022, 22: s317. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(22)01420-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem cell transplantLeukemia-free survivalPhase II trialHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeHR-MDS patientsClinical trial programII trialLeukemic stem cellsCombination therapyTim-3Trial programLeukemic cellsTransfusion-free intervalEvent-free survivalPhase III trialsStem cell transplantOverall response rateEarly phase trialsNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationImprovement of fatigueExpansion cohortIntensive chemotherapyPrimary endpointDurable responsesIII trials
2015
Comparative Effectiveness of Azacitidine Versus Decitabine Among Older Adults Diagnosed with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS)
Zeidan A, Long J, Hall J, Wang R, Huntington S, Abel G, Prebet T, Podoltsev N, Gross C, Gore S, Ma X, Davidoff A. Comparative Effectiveness of Azacitidine Versus Decitabine Among Older Adults Diagnosed with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS). Blood 2015, 126: 3285. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v126.23.3285.3285.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeHR-MDS patientsKaplan-Meier survival curvesEnd of studyHMA initiationMedian OSClinical trialsComorbidity countHazard ratioHigh school educationClinical practiceMultivariate Cox proportional hazards modelSurvival curvesEnd Results-Medicare databaseMedian household incomeRandomized phase III trialReal-world clinical practiceCox proportional hazards modelOlder MDS patientsDisability Status ScoreRetrospective cohort studyOverall survival advantagePhase III trialsYear of diagnosisErythropoiesis-stimulating agents