SU‐E‐T‐208: Comparison of MR Image Quality of Various Brachytherapy Applicators for Cervical Cancer
Soliman A, Elzibak A, Fatemi A, Safigholi H, Han D, Leung E, Ravi A, Song W. SU‐E‐T‐208: Comparison of MR Image Quality of Various Brachytherapy Applicators for Cervical Cancer. Medical Physics 2015, 42: 3380-3380. DOI: 10.1118/1.4924569.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBrachytherapy of cervical cancerT2-weighted turbo spin-echoWater phantomMRI-guided brachytherapySusceptibility artifactsCervical cancerBrachytherapy applicationsMR image qualityCoil setAcquisition matrixTandem applicationsVoxel sizeGE scannerBody coilStainless steel applicatorAcquisition parametersTurbo spin echoClinical protocolsPhysical dimensionsImage qualityPara-sagittalMultiple acquisitionsClinical applicationMagnetic Resonance (MRCancerSU‐E‐T‐661: Quantitative MRI Assessment of a Novel Direction‐Modulated Brachytherapy Tandem Applicator for Cervical Cancer
Soliman A, Elzibak A, Fatemi A, Safigholi H, Han D, Leung E, Ravi A, Song W. SU‐E‐T‐661: Quantitative MRI Assessment of a Novel Direction‐Modulated Brachytherapy Tandem Applicator for Cervical Cancer. Medical Physics 2015, 42: 3488-3488. DOI: 10.1118/1.4925024.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDirection modulated brachytherapyWater phantomLine profilesBrachytherapy of cervical cancerMulti-channel receiver coilsMRI-guided brachytherapyTurbo spin echoCervical cancerMR image qualityImage guided brachytherapyBackground inhomogeneityFull-widthPhantomTandem applicationsFWHMT2-weighted imagesT2-weighted sequencesBody coilSusceptibility artifactsQuantitative MRI assessmentReceiver coilClinical imaging protocolsMRI scanning protocolMR scannerInhomogeneity