2023
Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in a longitudinal cohort of young breast cancer survivors
Sella T, Zheng Y, Rosenberg S, Ruddy K, Gelber S, Tamimi R, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges V, Come S, Carey L, Winer E, Partridge A. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in a longitudinal cohort of young breast cancer survivors. Npj Breast Cancer 2023, 9: 31. PMID: 37185922, PMCID: PMC10130172, DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00529-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBreast cancer survivorsYoung Women's Breast Cancer StudyYoung breast cancer survivorsAdjuvant endocrine therapyCancer survivorsBreast Cancer StudyEndocrine therapyBreast cancerHormone receptor-positive breast cancerReceptor-positive breast cancerAromatase inhibitor monotherapyMulticenter prospective cohortPotential sociodemographic disparitiesRecurrence/deathRisk-based careReceipt of chemotherapyNon-Hispanic whitesWarrants further investigationPostmenopausal womenInhibitor monotherapyProspective cohortMultivariable analysisEligible participantsMean ageLongitudinal cohort
2022
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in male breast cancer compared with female breast cancer
Leone JP, Hassett MJ, Leone J, Tolaney SM, Vallejo CT, Leone BA, Winer EP, Lin NU. Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in male breast cancer compared with female breast cancer. Cancer 2022, 128: 3796-3803. PMID: 36069365, PMCID: PMC9826058, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34448.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPathologic complete responseFive-year OSNeoadjuvant chemotherapyMale breast cancerBreast cancerTumor subtypesOverall survivalIndependent associationEfficacy of NACInitiation of NACHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Epidermal growth factor receptor 2National Cancer DatabaseGrowth factor receptor 2Multivariable logistic regressionFemale breast cancerFactor receptor 2HR-/HER2Complete responseMedian timeMultivariable analysisKaplan-MeierCancer DatabaseReceptor 2Logistic regression
2021
Impact of Cancer History on Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19
Klein IA, Rosenberg SM, Reynolds KL, Zubiri L, Rosovsky R, Piper-Vallillo A, Gao X, Boland G, Bardia A, Gaither R, Freeman H, Kirkner GJ, Rhee C, Klompas M, Baker MA, Wadleigh M, Winer EP, Kotton CN, Partridge AH. Impact of Cancer History on Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. The Oncologist 2021, 26: 685-693. PMID: 33856099, PMCID: PMC8251362, DOI: 10.1002/onco.13794.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHistory of cancerIndependent risk factorDeath/hospiceSevere COVID-19Survivors of cancerHospitalized patientsCancer historyActive cancerRisk factorsCurrent cancer diagnosisCancer diagnosisCOVID-19Laboratory-confirmed COVID-19Intensive care unit admissionCare unit admissionOdds of intubationCancer-directed therapySystemic cancer therapyStandard anticancer therapiesRecent cancer treatmentUnit admissionHospice admissionMedian ageMedian timeMultivariable analysis
2020
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score test in young women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer
Sella T, Gelber SI, Poorvu PD, Kim HJ, Dominici L, Guzman-Arocho YD, Collins L, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn JM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Snow C, Jakubowski DM, Russell CA, Winer EP, Rosenberg SM, Partridge AH. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score test in young women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2020, 186: 157-165. PMID: 33150547, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05989-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrence Score resultsNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete responseBreast cancerBreast Cancer StudyYoung womenEstrogen receptor-positive early breast cancerReceptor-positive early breast cancerYoung Women's Breast Cancer StudyHER2-negative breast cancerScore resultsEarly breast cancerLogistic regression modelingAdjuvant chemotherapyNeoadjuvant therapyProspective cohortComplete responseMedian ageMultivariable analysisRecurrence scoreVs. 5Clinical careTumor specimensStage IPatientsClinical Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Hormone Receptor–positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients who Received Letrozole with or Without Bevacizumab
Magbanua MJM, Savenkov O, Asmus EJ, Ballman KV, Scott JH, Park JW, Dickler M, Partridge A, Carey LA, Winer EP, Rugo HS. Clinical Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Hormone Receptor–positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients who Received Letrozole with or Without Bevacizumab. Clinical Cancer Research 2020, 26: 4911-4920. PMID: 32586939, PMCID: PMC7501177, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1329.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProgression-free survivalCTC-positive patientsHormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patientsMetastatic breast cancer patientsAddition of bevacizumabBreast cancer patientsOverall survivalCancer patientsPredictive valueMean survival time analysisMedian progression-free survivalWorse progression-free survivalAssociation of CTCsCTC-negative patientsFirst-line settingRisk of progressionCox regression modelPotential predictive valueML of bloodAdditional time pointsCirculating Tumor CellsLetrozole armOS benefitPFS benefitMultivariable analysis
2019
Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) receiving letrozole (Let) or Let plus bevacizumab (Bev): CALGB 40503 (Alliance).
Magbanua M, Oleksandr Savenkov O, Asmus E, Ballman K, Scott J, Park J, Dickler M, Partridge A, Carey L, Winer E, Rugo H. Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) receiving letrozole (Let) or Let plus bevacizumab (Bev): CALGB 40503 (Alliance). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: 1049-1049. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.1049.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalOverall survivalCTC statusHormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patientsPredictive valueLonger median progression-free survivalImproved progression-free survivalMedian progression-free survivalMetastatic breast cancer patientsWorse progression-free survivalAddition of BevFirst-line therapyCox regression analysisEarly breast cancerInitiation of treatmentBreast cancer patientsPotential predictive valueML of bloodMetastatic diseaseMultivariable analysisCancer patientsClinical significanceBreast cancerUS FDATumor cells
2017
Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC): Pooled-analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials.
Martin M, Loibl S, Hyslop T, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Aktas B, Cirrincione C, Carrasco E, Mehta K, Barry W, Morales S, Carey L, Garcia Saenz J, Partridge A, Martinez N, Hahn O, Winer E, Guerrero A, Hudis C, Casas M, Dickler M. Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC): Pooled-analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 1012-1012. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.1012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalAdvanced breast cancerRandomized trialsMedian progression-free survivalNegative advanced breast cancerBreast Cancer Research FoundationAddition of BevMultivariable Cox modelAddition of bevacizumabFirst-line treatmentCancer Research FoundationCardiovascular eventsPgR statusSecondary endpointsLiver eventsRecurrent diseaseMedian ageMultivariable analysisTreatment armsPatient populationBreast cancerGrade 3Prolonged benefitCox modelStudy-level differences
2013
Choosing mastectomy over lumpectomy: Factors associated with surgical decisions in young women with breast cancer.
Rosenberg S, Sepucha K, Ruddy K, Tamimi R, Gelber S, Meyer M, Schapira L, Come S, Borges V, Winer E, Partridge A. Choosing mastectomy over lumpectomy: Factors associated with surgical decisions in young women with breast cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 6507-6507. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.6507.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBreast cancerYoung womenSurgical decisionStage IMulti-center cohort studyEstrogen receptor-positive tumorsReceptor-positive tumorsFinal multivariable modelFear of recurrenceDefinitive surgeryNodal involvementCohort studyMedian ageBilateral mastectomyER statusMultivariable analysisLower BMIPositive tumorsTumor sizeSurgical choiceOvarian cancerTumor gradeMultivariable modelMastectomyAge 40
2006
Study participants’ perceptions of the process and impact of receiving results of N9831
Partridge A, Wolff A, Marcom P, Kaufman P, Moore C, Lake D, Fleming G, Rugo H, Collyar D, Winer E. Study participants’ perceptions of the process and impact of receiving results of N9831. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24: 518-518. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.518.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTrial participantsLarge cooperative group trialsPhase III trialsCooperative group trialsSubset of womenClinical trial participantsHealth care providersAdjuvant chemotherapyRecurrent diseaseIII trialsMultivariable analysisClinical trialsBreast cancerGroup trialsCare providersAverage ageFavorable responseClinical investigatorsPsychosocial supportPatientsWomenSubstantial proportionTrialsStudy resultsGreater satisfactionFactors Related to Underuse of Surveillance Mammography Among Breast Cancer Survivors
Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Factors Related to Underuse of Surveillance Mammography Among Breast Cancer Survivors. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24: 85-94. PMID: 16382117, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.02.4174.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer survivorsSurveillance mammographyCancer survivorsMonth 7Elderly breast cancer survivorsEnd Results-Medicare dataOlder breast cancer survivorsAnnual surveillance mammographyPrimary surgical therapyRepeated-measures logistic regressionLower mammography ratesQuarter of womenPopulation-based sampleService Medicare enrolleesBreast cancer diagnosisSurgical therapyAnnual mammographyGuideline recommendationsMedical oncologistsMultivariable analysisNonclinical factorsMammography ratesBreast cancerMammography useStage I