2022
Mutational signature profiling classifies subtypes of clinically different mismatch-repair-deficient tumours with a differential immunogenic response potential
Giner-Calabuig M, De Leon S, Wang J, Fehlmann TD, Ukaegbu C, Gibson J, Alustiza-Fernandez M, Pico MD, Alenda C, Herraiz M, Carrillo-Palau M, Salces I, Reyes J, Ortega SP, Obrador-Hevia A, Cecchini M, Syngal S, Stoffel E, Ellis NA, Sweasy J, Jover R, Llor X, Xicola RM. Mutational signature profiling classifies subtypes of clinically different mismatch-repair-deficient tumours with a differential immunogenic response potential. British Journal Of Cancer 2022, 126: 1595-1603. PMID: 35197584, PMCID: PMC9130322, DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01754-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLynch-like syndromeMMR-deficient tumorsLynch syndromeMicrosatellite instabilityPercent of tumorsMSH2/MSH6 expressionColorectal cancer tumorsPMS2 protein expressionMutational signaturesResultsFifty-three percentClinical managementNeoantigen presentationMSH6 expressionHallmark of tumorsTumor behaviorMMR deficiencyClinical phenotypeDeficient tumorsTumorsSporadic tumorsCancer tumorsMutational profileProtein expressionRepair deficiencySyndromeLynch-like Syndrome: Potential Mechanisms and Management
Martínez-Roca A, Giner-Calabuig M, Murcia O, Castillejo A, Soto JL, García-Heredia A, Jover R. Lynch-like Syndrome: Potential Mechanisms and Management. Cancers 2022, 14: 1115. PMID: 35267422, PMCID: PMC8909420, DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051115.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLynch-like syndromeMicrosatellite instabilityLynch syndromeSporadic casesCommon hereditary colorectal cancer syndromeHereditary colorectal cancer syndromesGermline mutationsPotential mechanismsColorectal cancer syndromeFirst-degree relativesProportion of casesColon cancer casesPrevention of cancerAutosomal dominant disorderMMR immunohistochemistryColorectal cancerMismatch repair system genesCancer casesCancer syndromesSyndromeHereditary casesTumor samplesMMR genesDominant disorderMMR proteins
2018
Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy
Murcia O, Juárez M, Rodríguez-Soler M, Hernández-Illán E, Giner-Calabuig M, Alustiza M, Egoavil C, Castillejo A, Alenda C, Barberá V, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Yuste A, Bujanda L, Clofent J, Andreu M, Castells A, Llor X, Zapater P, Jover R. Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy. PLOS ONE 2018, 13: e0203051. PMID: 30188916, PMCID: PMC6126803, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDisease-free survivalColorectal cancerMicrosatellite instabilityCIMP statusTNM stageKRAS mutationsBRAF mutationsMSS tumorsMolecular classificationAdvanced stage IIRetrospective observational studyPopulation-based cohortCpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) statusCancer molecular classificationSomatic KRASAdjuvant chemotherapyAdjuvant treatmentCRC patientsPrognostic implicationsWorse prognosisPrognostic valueClinical criteriaObservational studyMolecular subtypesMAIN OUTCOMEColorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability, and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy.
Murcia O, Juárez M, Hernández-Illán E, Rodriguez-Soler M, Giner-Calabuig M, Alustiza M, Egoavil C, Castillejo A, Alenda C, Mangas C, Barberá V, Yuste A, Bujanda L, Clofent J, Andreu M, Castells A, Llor X, Zapater P, Jover R. Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability, and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2018, 36: 668-668. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.668.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDisease-free survivalColorectal cancerMicrosatellite instabilityCIMP statusTNM stageKRAS mutationsBRAF mutationsMSS tumorsMolecular classificationAdvanced stage IIRetrospective observational studyPopulation-based cohortCpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) statusCancer molecular classificationSomatic KRASAdjuvant chemotherapyAdjuvant treatmentCRC patientsWorse prognosisPrognostic implicationsPrognostic valueClinical criteriaObservational studyMolecular subtypesMAIN OUTCOME
2016
Serrated colorectal cancer: Molecular classification, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy
Murcia O, Juárez M, Hernández-Illán E, Egoavil C, Giner-Calabuig M, Rodríguez-Soler M, Jover R. Serrated colorectal cancer: Molecular classification, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy. World Journal Of Gastroenterology 2016, 22: 3516-3530. PMID: 27053844, PMCID: PMC4814638, DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3516.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMutationNeoplasm StagingPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Treatment OutcomeConceptsColorectal cancerSerrated pathwayGene mutationsKRAS gene mutationsBRAF gene mutationClinical featuresColorectal carcinogenesisMolecular alterationsMicrosatellite instabilityHistological analysisSerrated appearanceTumor suppressor geneMolecular classificationAlternative pathwayChemotherapyPrognosisMolecular advancesSuppressor geneGenetic profileNew classificationPathwayHypermethylationTumorsCancerMutations