1992
3 “What thin Partitions Sense from Thought Divide”: Toward a New Cognitive Psychophysics11Preparation of this chapter was supported in part by grant DC-00818 from the National Institutes of Health. I thank Daniel Algom and Bonnie Potts for comments on an earlier version. Please direct correspondence to Lawrence E. Marks, John B. Pierce Laboratory, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519.
Marks L. 3 “What thin Partitions Sense from Thought Divide”: Toward a New Cognitive Psychophysics11Preparation of this chapter was supported in part by grant DC-00818 from the National Institutes of Health. I thank Daniel Algom and Bonnie Potts for comments on an earlier version. Please direct correspondence to Lawrence E. Marks, John B. Pierce Laboratory, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519. Advances In Psychology 1992, 92: 115-186. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61779-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive psychologyPerceptual representationsInternal manipulationStimulus objectsSensory psychophysicsPsychophysical judgmentsAbstract symbolsMeasure of excitationSensory meaningsAuditory systemPsychophysicsSemantic theoryExternal stimuliAlgomMinitheoriesPsychologyMeasuresStimuliPerceptionReferentsJudgmentsLoudnessMeaningRepresentationSymbols
1979
A theory of loudness and loudness judgments
Marks L. A theory of loudness and loudness judgments. Psychological Review 1979, 86: 256-285. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.86.3.256.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLoudness differencesPerceptual basisAuditory processesPerceptual relationshipsPsychophysical judgmentsHierarchy of stagesPsychological scalesLoudness summationAuditory functioningSone scaleBinaural loudness summationPeripheral stagesLoudness judgmentsAuditory systemJudgmentsCentral stageLoudnessIntensity of soundCritical bandEnergy summationFunctioningTheoryScaleProcessingSound