2023
Contemporary Methods for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Intervention
Uzendu A, Kennedy K, Chertow G, Amin A, Giri J, Rymer J, Bangalore S, Lavin K, Anderson C, Wang T, Curtis J, Spertus J. Contemporary Methods for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 16: 2294-2305. PMID: 37758384, PMCID: PMC10795198, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute kidney injuryPercutaneous coronary interventionValidation cohortKidney injuryCoronary interventionClinical careIncidence of AKIBedside risk scoreBaseline renal functionNCDR CathPCI RegistryLogistic regression modelsAKI riskNew dialysisAKI predictionCathPCI RegistryRenal functionCommon complicationDerivation cohortMedian ageAKI modelClinical instabilityPCI proceduresC-statisticPatient riskContrast dosesLong-Term Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Almarzooq Z, Tamez H, Wang Y, Curtis J, Kirtane A, Secemsky E, Valsdottir L, Yeh R. Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2023, 2: 100584. PMID: 39129810, PMCID: PMC11307545, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100584.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNon-CTO percutaneous coronary interventionCTO percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionLong-term major adverse cardiovascular eventsChronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventionMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsAdverse cardiovascular eventsHospital eventsHigh riskCardiovascular eventsCoronary interventionMyocardial infarctionLower riskNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryST-elevation myocardial infarctionHospital event ratesElevation myocardial infarctionLong-term outcomesRepeat revascularizationStable anginaCathPCI RegistryResults PatientsTerm outcomesPCI proceduresMedicare beneficiaries
2021
Comparison of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Contemporary U.S. Practice With ISCHEMIA Trial Population
Chatterjee S, Fanaroff AC, Parzynski C, Curtis J, Kolansky DM, Maddox TM, Mukherjee D, Yeh RW, Giri J. Comparison of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Contemporary U.S. Practice With ISCHEMIA Trial Population. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 14: 2344-2349. PMID: 34736733, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.047.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStable ischemic heart diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionISCHEMIA trialSIHD patientsCoronary interventionNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryStudy periodHospital mortality rateHigh-risk featuresProportion of patientsTrial inclusion criteriaComparison of patientsIschemic heart diseaseCross-sectional analysisIschemic burdenMedian hospitalAngina symptomsCathPCI RegistryTrial populationComparator groupEnrollment criteriaMyocardial infarctionHeart diseaseU.S. patientsInclusion criteriaThe bleeding risk treatment paradox at the physician and hospital level: Implications for reducing bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Amin AP, Frogge N, Kulkarni H, Ridolfi G, Ewald G, Miller R, Hall B, Rogers S, Gluckman T, Curtis J, Masoudi FA, Rao SV. The bleeding risk treatment paradox at the physician and hospital level: Implications for reducing bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. American Heart Journal 2021, 243: 221-231. PMID: 34543645, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.021.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk-treatment paradoxPercutaneous coronary interventionVascular closure deviceCoronary interventionClosure deviceBAS useNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCINational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryPost-PCI bleedingHigh-risk tertileHigher bleeding rateInter-physician variationLevel of physiciansPCI patientsCathPCI RegistryIndependent predictorsTransradial interventionRisk tertilesCostly complicationBleeding rateHigh prevalenceHigh riskMortality riskBleedingLower riskComparing Baseline Data From Registries With Trials Evidence From the CathPCI Registry and DAPT Study
Butala NM, Faridi KF, Secemsky EA, Song Y, Curtis J, Gibson CM, Brindis R, Shen C, Yeh RW. Comparing Baseline Data From Registries With Trials Evidence From the CathPCI Registry and DAPT Study. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 14: 1386-1388. PMID: 34167685, PMCID: PMC8800637, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.065.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPredicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Castro-Dominguez YS, Wang Y, Minges KE, McNamara RL, Spertus JA, Dehmer GJ, Messenger JC, Lavin K, Anderson C, Blankinship K, Mercado N, Clary JM, Osborne AD, Curtis JP, Cavender MA. Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2021, 78: 216-229. PMID: 33957239, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.067.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionHospital mortalityQuality improvement effortsCoronary interventionDevelopment cohortValidation cohortRisk-standardized mortality ratesHospital risk-standardized mortality ratesBedside risk scoreHigh-risk patientsIn-Hospital MortalityHospital mortality riskRisk of mortalityLevel of consciousnessProcedural urgencyCathPCI RegistryClinical presentationRisk cohortRisk stratificationCardiovascular instabilityCardiac arrestMortality riskRisk scoreClinical acuityClinical relevanceIN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY RISK PREDICTION FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS: AN UPDATED MODEL FROM THE NCDR CATHPCI REGISTRY
Dominguez Y, Minges K, Wang Y, McNamara R, Spertus J, Dehmer G, Messenger J, Mercado N, Lavin K, Pierre D, Anderson C, Blankinship K, Clary J, Osborne A, Curtis J, Cavender M. IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY RISK PREDICTION FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS: AN UPDATED MODEL FROM THE NCDR CATHPCI REGISTRY. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2021, 77: 1217. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(21)02576-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTemporal Changes and Institutional Variation in Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the United States
Secemsky EA, Butala N, Raja A, Khera R, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Maddox TM, Virani SS, Armstrong EJ, Shunk KA, Brindis RG, Bhatt D, Yeh RW. Temporal Changes and Institutional Variation in Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the United States. JAMA Cardiology 2021, 6: 574-580. PMID: 33146666, PMCID: PMC7643043, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.5354.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMV-percutaneous coronary interventionST-elevation myocardial infarctionMultivessel percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionMajor epicardial vesselsPCI useMV diseaseCoronary interventionIndex procedureMyocardial infarctionSTEMI admissionsEpicardial vesselsNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryIndex percutaneous coronary interventionMore major epicardial vesselsMultivessel coronary artery diseaseCoronary stentsSmall randomized studiesDays of dischargeCoronary artery diseaseMinority of patientsIndex admissionNonculprit lesionsCathPCI RegistryComplete revascularizationPrognosis of Claims‐ Versus Trial‐Based Ischemic and Bleeding Events Beyond 1 Year After Coronary Stenting
Butala NM, Faridi KF, Secemsky EA, Song Y, Curtis J, Gibson CM, Kazi D, Shen C, Yeh RW. Prognosis of Claims‐ Versus Trial‐Based Ischemic and Bleeding Events Beyond 1 Year After Coronary Stenting. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2021, 10: e018744. PMID: 33682431, PMCID: PMC8174225, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.018744.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUnadjusted mortality ratesIschemic eventsDAPT studyMortality rateEnd pointCox proportional hazards modelPercutaneous coronary interventionProportional hazards modelCardiovascular clinical trialsTrial adjudicationBleeding eventsCathPCI RegistryCoronary interventionCoronary stentingSimilar prognosisPrognostic significanceClinical eventsClinical trialsMedicare claimsAdministrative claimsMortality riskHazards modelPatientsPrognosisDeathComparability of Event Adjudication Versus Administrative Billing Claims for Outcome Ascertainment in the DAPT Study
Faridi KF, Tamez H, Butala NM, Song Y, Shen C, Secemsky EA, Mauri L, Curtis JP, Strom JB, Yeh RW. Comparability of Event Adjudication Versus Administrative Billing Claims for Outcome Ascertainment in the DAPT Study. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And Outcomes 2021, 14: e006589. PMID: 33435731, PMCID: PMC7855905, DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006589.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valueMyocardial infarctionPredictive valueDAPT studyClinical trialsAdjudicated eventsClaims dataNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryClinical events committeeTrial of patientsPercutaneous coronary interventionTrial end pointsKappa statisticsAdjudicated deathCathPCI RegistryCerebrovascular eventsCoronary interventionCumulative incidenceEvents committeeOutcome ascertainmentBilling claimsInpatient hospitalizationBleeding rateCardiovascular disease
2020
Attribution of Adverse Events Following Coronary Stent Placement Identified Using Administrative Claims Data
Dhruva SS, Parzynski CS, Gamble GM, Curtis JP, Desai NR, Yeh RW, Masoudi FA, Kuntz R, Shaw RE, Marinac‐Dabic D, Sedrakyan A, Normand S, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Attribution of Adverse Events Following Coronary Stent Placement Identified Using Administrative Claims Data. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2020, 9: e013606. PMID: 32063087, PMCID: PMC7070203, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.013606.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary RestenosisCoronary ThrombosisDatabases, FactualDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRegistriesRetreatmentRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsIndex percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionSame coronary arteryDrug-eluting stentsNCDR CathPCI RegistrySubsequent percutaneous coronary interventionAcute myocardial infarctionCoronary arteryClaims dataCathPCI RegistryAdverse eventsIndex procedureMyocardial infarctionRepeat percutaneous coronary interventionReal-world registry dataTarget vessel revascularizationCoronary stent placementAdministrative claims dataLong-term safetyLongitudinal claims dataPotential safety eventsVessel revascularizationCoronary interventionDES placementStent thrombosisStent selection among patients with chronic kidney disease: Results from the NCDR CathPCI Registry
Feldman DA, Shroff AR, Bao H, Curtis JP, Minges KE, Ardati AK. Stent selection among patients with chronic kidney disease: Results from the NCDR CathPCI Registry. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 96: 1213-1221. PMID: 31909543, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28698.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChronic kidney diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionST-elevation myocardial infarctionDES usageBare metal stentsNCDR CathPCI RegistryCathPCI RegistryRenal functionKidney diseasePCI casesElective percutaneous coronary interventionAdvanced renal dysfunctionNormal renal functionCoronary stent placementCKD stageRenal dysfunctionCoronary interventionUse of DESMyocardial infarctionStent placementSubgroup analysisStent usageMetal stentsPatientsStent selection
2019
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population
Dreyer RP, Tavella R, Curtis JP, Wang Y, Pauspathy S, Messenger J, Rumsfeld JS, Maddox TM, Krumholz HM, Spertus JA, Beltrame JF. Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population. European Heart Journal 2019, 41: 870-878. PMID: 31222249, PMCID: PMC7778433, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz403.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsAcute myocardial infarctionHeart failureMyocardial infarctionCoronary angiographyComponents of MACENational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryNon-obstructive coronary arteriesObstructive coronary artery diseaseAdverse cardiac eventsMajor adverse eventsObservational cohort studyObstructive coronary diseasePrognosis of patientsCoronary artery diseaseMACE componentsMINOCA patientsAdjusted riskCause mortalityPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsCardiac eventsCathPCI RegistryCohort study
2018
Adoption of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention and rates of vascular complications following transfemoral procedures: Insights from NCDR
Badri M, Shapiro T, Wang Y, Minges KE, Curtis JP, Gray WA. Adoption of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention and rates of vascular complications following transfemoral procedures: Insights from NCDR. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2018, 92: 835-841. PMID: 29359497, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27490.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionTransfemoral percutaneous coronary interventionVascular complicationsTransradial approachCoronary interventionAccess site bleedingNCDR CathPCI RegistryFemoral operatorsTransfemoral proceduresRetroperitoneal bleedingCathPCI RegistrySite bleedingRetrospective analysisComplicationsPropensity scorePreadoption periodBleedingMeaningful increaseInterventionRecent studiesHematomaRegistryNCDRAccess skillsPhysicians
2017
Hospital Performance on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process and Outcomes Measures
Chui PW, Parzynski CS, Nallamothu BK, Masoudi FA, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP. Hospital Performance on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process and Outcomes Measures. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2017, 6: e004276. PMID: 28446493, PMCID: PMC5524055, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.004276.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCardiac RehabilitationCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesHealthcare DisparitiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMedicarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsProcess Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareReferral and ConsultationRegistriesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsProcess measuresReadmission ratesOutcome measuresNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryHospital performancePercutaneous coronary interventionSpecific process measuresRisk-standardized mortalityPCI patientsCathPCI RegistryCoronary interventionHospital variationOutcome ratesHospital qualityPhysician ConsortiumMortalitySmall percentageWeak correlationAssociationIntervention processPatients
2016
Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict 30‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients
Minges KE, Herrin J, Fiorilli PN, Curtis JP. Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict 30‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 89: 955-963. PMID: 27515069, PMCID: PMC5397364, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26701.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMedicareMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPatient ReadmissionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsRisk of readmissionPCI patientsRisk scoreMultivariable logistic regression modelRisk score developmentDays of dischargeSimple risk scoreTime of dischargeModel c-statisticLogistic regression modelsStepwise selection modelCathPCI RegistryHospital dischargeReadmission ratesClinical factorsRevascularization proceduresValidation cohortC-statisticReadmissionHigh riskMedicare feeLower riskService claimsPatientsCohortTemporal Trends in the Risk Profile of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Vora AN, Dai D, Gurm H, Amin AP, Messenger JC, Mahmud E, Mauri L, Wang TY, Roe MT, Curtis J, Patel MR, Dauerman HL, Peterson ED, Rao SV. Temporal Trends in the Risk Profile of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 9: e003070. PMID: 26957417, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.115.003070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk profileCathPCI RegistryHospital admissionPatient riskHigh riskCardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry's CathPCI RegistryNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryOutpatient percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) proceduresProportion of outpatientsProportion of patientsPercutaneous coronary interventionInpatient hospital stayCoronary intervention proceduresPost-PCI complicationsLevel of careOutpatient reimbursementHospital stayCoronary interventionGreater comorbidityOutpatient basisPCI proceduresAmerican CollegeLower riskPatients
2015
Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Desai NR, Bradley SM, Parzynski CS, Nallamothu BK, Chan PS, Spertus JA, Patel MR, Ader J, Soufer A, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP. Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JAMA 2015, 314: 2045-2053. PMID: 26551163, PMCID: PMC5459470, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.13764.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNonacute percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionAppropriate use criteriaInappropriate percutaneous coronary interventionHospital-level variationCoronary revascularizationPatient selectionUse criteriaCoronary interventionStudy periodAppropriateness of PCINational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryProportion of PCIsMultivessel coronary artery diseaseHigh-risk findingsCoronary artery diseaseAnnual PCI volumesCross-sectional analysisAngina severityAntianginal medicationsAcute indicationsCathPCI RegistryArtery diseasePCI volumePCI proceduresAssociation of Physician Certification in Interventional Cardiology With In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Fiorilli PN, Minges KE, Herrin J, Messenger JC, Ting HH, Nallamothu BK, Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Holmboe ES, Brennan JJ, Curtis JP. Association of Physician Certification in Interventional Cardiology With In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation 2015, 132: 1816-1824. PMID: 26384518, PMCID: PMC4641797, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017523.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEmergency coronary artery bypassPercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery bypassArtery bypassVascular complicationsHospital mortalityEnd pointHospital outcomesCoronary interventionPCI proceduresIn-Hospital OutcomesPrimary end pointSecondary end pointsComposite end pointRisk of bleedingHierarchical multivariable modelInternal Medicine certificationAmerican BoardCathPCI RegistryPatient characteristicsPCI volumeUnadjusted outcomesAdverse outcomesPatient outcomesMultivariable modelPercutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States
Thomas MP, Parzynski CS, Curtis JP, Seth M, Nallamothu BK, Chan PS, Spertus JA, Patel MR, Bradley SM, Gurm HS. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States. PLOS ONE 2015, 10: e0138251. PMID: 26379053, PMCID: PMC4575022, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138251.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAppropriate use criteriaHospital referral regionsPCI utilizationQuintile 5PCI ratesQuintiles 1PCI appropriatenessPercutaneous coronary intervention useMedicare Limited Data SetRisk-adjusted mortalityNCDR CathPCI RegistryElective PCICathPCI RegistryInappropriate indicationsPatient characteristicsStudy cohortAppropriate indicationsPCI proceduresHeart AssociationCardiovascular AngiographyStudy populationAmerican CollegeReferral regionsSubstantial geographic variationIntervention utilization