2023
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus definitions for resistance to combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Kluger H, Barrett J, Gainor J, Hamid O, Hurwitz M, LaVallee T, Moss R, Zappasodi R, Sullivan R, Tawbi H, Sharon E. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus definitions for resistance to combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Journal For ImmunoTherapy Of Cancer 2023, 11: e005921. PMID: 36918224, PMCID: PMC10016305, DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005921.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsImmune checkpoint inhibitorsCheckpoint inhibitorsAnti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitorTrial designConsensus definitionConsensus clinical definitionExtended disease controlNew combination regimensImmunotherapy of cancerStandard of careLong-term survivalClinical trial designICI combinationsInitial immunotherapyMetastatic settingTreatment discontinuationDurable responsesTreatment landscapeCombination regimensMechanisms of resistancePerioperative settingPrimary resistanceClinical definitionDefinition of resistanceImmunotherapy
2021
Analysis of multispectral imaging with the AstroPath platform informs efficacy of PD-1 blockade
Berry S, Giraldo NA, Green BF, Cottrell TR, Stein JE, Engle EL, Xu H, Ogurtsova A, Roberts C, Wang D, Nguyen P, Zhu Q, Soto-Diaz S, Loyola J, Sander IB, Wong PF, Jessel S, Doyle J, Signer D, Wilton R, Roskes JS, Eminizer M, Park S, Sunshine JC, Jaffee EM, Baras A, De Marzo AM, Topalian SL, Kluger H, Cope L, Lipson EJ, Danilova L, Anders RA, Rimm DL, Pardoll DM, Szalay AS, Taube JM. Analysis of multispectral imaging with the AstroPath platform informs efficacy of PD-1 blockade. Science 2021, 372 PMID: 34112666, PMCID: PMC8709533, DOI: 10.1126/science.aba2609.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD8 AntigensFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansImmune Checkpoint ProteinsMacrophagesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProgression-Free SurvivalReceptors, Cell SurfaceSingle-Cell AnalysisSOXE Transcription FactorsT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentConceptsAnti-programmed cell death 1Anti-PD-1 blockadePD-1 blockadeCell death 1Tissue-based biomarkersLong-term survivalTumor tissue sectionsDeath-1PD-1PD-L1Immunoregulatory moleculesT cellsIndependent cohortMyeloid cellsMelanoma specimensMultiple cell typesTissue sectionsLow/BlockadeCell typesDistinct expression patternsExpression patternsImagingCD8Foxp3
2019
Safety, Clinical Activity, and Biological Correlates of Response in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: Results from a Phase I Trial of Atezolizumab
Hamid O, Molinero L, Bolen CR, Sosman JA, Muñoz-Couselo E, Kluger HM, McDermott DF, Powderly J, Sarkar I, Ballinger M, Fassò M, O'Hear C, Chen DS, Hegde PS, Hodi FS. Safety, Clinical Activity, and Biological Correlates of Response in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: Results from a Phase I Trial of Atezolizumab. Clinical Cancer Research 2019, 25: 6061-6072. PMID: 31358540, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3488.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorFatigueFemaleFeverFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalPruritusRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSkinSkin NeoplasmsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTranscriptomeYoung AdultConceptsTreatment-related adverse eventsAdverse eventsOverall survivalMetastatic melanomaCommon treatment-related adverse eventsMost treatment-related adverse eventsAntitumor T-cell activityMeaningful long-term survivalActivity of atezolizumabEfficacy-evaluable patientsPhase Ia studyTreatment-related deathsMedian overall survivalPD-L1 expressionProgression-free survivalCohort of patientsPhase I trialT cell activityOverall response rateBiological correlatesLong-term safetyLong-term survivalPrimary study objectiveDurable responsesGrade 1/2Long-term follow-up of CA209-004: A phase I dose-escalation study of combined nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI) in patients with advanced melanoma.
Atkins M, Kirkwood J, Wolchok J, Callahan M, Kluger H, Postow M, Segal N, Lesokhin A, Balogh A, Re S, Sznol M. Long-term follow-up of CA209-004: A phase I dose-escalation study of combined nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI) in patients with advanced melanoma. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: 9533-9533. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.9533.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPhase I dose-escalation studyI dose-escalation studyDose-escalation studyOS ratesAdvanced melanomaIPI 3Survival rateUnresectable stage IIIECOG performance statusDiscontinuation of treatmentFavorable survival outcomesProgression-free survivalOverall survival rateLong-term survivalExploratory endpointsElevated LDHLast dosePrimary endpointSecondary endpointsStudy drugConcurrent therapyPerformance statusSurvival outcomesDisease progressionCohort 1
2014
Long-term survival of ipilimumab-naive patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in a phase I trial.
Hodi F, Sznol M, Kluger H, McDermott D, Carvajal R, Lawrence D, Topalian S, Atkins M, Powderly J, Sharfman W, Puzanov I, Smith D, Leming P, Lipson E, Taube J, Anders R, Horak C, Kollia G, Gupta A, Sosman J. Long-term survival of ipilimumab-naive patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in a phase I trial. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2014, 32: 9002-9002. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9002.Peer-Reviewed Original Research