2011
GroEL/GroES‐mediated protein folding
Horwich A, Tyagi N, Clare D, Saibil H. GroEL/GroES‐mediated protein folding. The FASEB Journal 2011, 25: 319.3-319.3. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.25.1_supplement.319.3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProtein foldingGroEL/GroES chaperonin systemGroE chaperonin systemSubstrate protein bindingNon-native speciesChaperonin systemGroEL ringApical domainConformational trajectoryDomain movementsGroES bindingGroESHydrophobic contactsGroELFoldingInitial associationBindingProtein bindingOpen ringCryoEMSpeciesATPDomainNumber of approaches
2001
ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy
Ranson N, Farr G, Roseman A, Gowen B, Fenton W, Horwich A, Saibil H. ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy. Cell 2001, 107: 869-879. PMID: 11779463, DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00617-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCryo-electron microscopySalt-bridge contactsGroEL ringGroEL-GroESChaperonin GroELSalt bridge interactionsCryo-EMMolecular machinesADP complexGroELATPRing complexBridge interactionEffect of ATPCooperativityOpposite ringIntermediate domainGroESGeneral insightsComplexesPolypeptideDomainBridge contactsStructural modelAffinity
2000
Multivalent Binding of Nonnative Substrate Proteins by the Chaperonin GroEL
Farr G, Furtak K, Rowland M, Ranson N, Saibil H, Kirchhausen T, Horwich A. Multivalent Binding of Nonnative Substrate Proteins by the Chaperonin GroEL. Cell 2000, 100: 561-573. PMID: 10721993, DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80692-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCattleChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Chemical PhenomenaChemistry, PhysicalCryoelectron MicroscopyCystineEscherichia coliEthylmaleimideImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMacromolecular SubstancesMalate DehydrogenaseModels, MolecularPeptidesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein Structure, TertiaryRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseStructure-Activity RelationshipThiosulfate SulfurtransferaseConceptsNonnative substrate proteinApical domainSubstrate proteinsChaperonin GroELWild-type domainCross-linking experimentsCochaperonin GroESNonnative proteinsProductive foldingGroEL ringSingle polypeptideHydrophobic residuesMalate dehydrogenaseBinary complex formationRubiscoProteinInside aspectMultivalent bindingGroELCentral cavityComplex formationBindingDomainGroESOpen ring
1995
Unliganded GroEL at 2.8 Å: structure and functional implications
Sigler P, Horwich A. Unliganded GroEL at 2.8 Å: structure and functional implications. Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences 1995, 348: 113-119. PMID: 7770481, DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0052.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsATP-binding pocketCentral channelUnfolded polypeptidesApical domainThree-dimensional structureExtensive mutagenesisMutational studiesDyad symmetryC-terminusDistinct domainsGroELATP analogBiochemical studiesStructural scaffoldFunctional implicationsHigh saltSubunitsDomainChaperoninGroESMutagenesisEntire lengthCrystal formsPolypeptideSymmetric ring