2023
Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Zeidan A, Ando K, Rauzy O, Turgut M, Wang M, Cairoli R, Hou H, Kwong Y, Arnan M, Meers S, Pullarkat V, Santini V, Malek K, Kiertsman F, Niolat J, Ramos P, Menssen H, Fenaux P, Miyazaki Y, Platzbecker U. Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Haematology 2023, 11: e38-e50. PMID: 38065203, DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00333-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeProgression-free survivalComplete response rateMyelodysplastic syndromePlacebo groupPrimary endpointUntreated patientsAdverse eventsComplete responseResponse rateImmune-mediated adverse eventsMedian progression-free survivalRandomised phase 3 trialT-cell immunoglobulin domainFinal data cutoffTreatment-related deathsCommon adverse eventsFull analysis setMucin domain 3Phase 2 studyPhase 2 trialPhase 3 trialLeukaemic stem cellsFebrile neutropeniaData cutoffEfficacy of Imetelstat in Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) across Different Risk Subgroups in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in IMerge Phase 3 Study
Komrokji R, Santini V, Fenaux P, Savona M, Madanat Y, Berry T, Sherman L, Navada S, Feller F, Sun L, Xia Q, Wan Y, Huang F, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Efficacy of Imetelstat in Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) across Different Risk Subgroups in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in IMerge Phase 3 Study. Blood 2023, 142: 194. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-181237.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesDifferent risk subgroupsErythropoiesis stimulating agentsLow-risk subgroupsRisk groupsRisk subgroupsResponse rateTI ratesRBC-TIClinical efficacyRisk categoriesHigh riskLower riskRed blood cell transfusion independenceIPSS risk groupPhase 3 portionIntermediate-risk groupCytogenetic risk groupHigh-risk patientsPhase 3 studyPrognostic scoring systemIntermediate-risk subgroupsHigh-risk subgroupsHigh-risk groupBlinatumomab in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) of PD-1 and CTLA-4 in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CD19 Positive B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Results of a Phase I Study
Webster J, Luskin M, Rimando J, Blackford A, Zeidan A, Sharon E, Streicher H, DeAngelo D, Luznik L, Gojo I. Blinatumomab in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) of PD-1 and CTLA-4 in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CD19 Positive B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Results of a Phase I Study. Blood 2023, 142: 966. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-191109.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMixed phenotype acute leukemiaRelapse-free survivalOverall survivalAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaComplete remissionPD-1Checkpoint inhibitorsExtramedullary diseaseAdverse eventsBM blastsGrade 3Positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaResponse rateImmune-related adverse eventsB-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaMulti-center phase IPhase IDose-escalation schemaNon-hematologic toxicitiesMedian overall survivalDose-escalation studyPD-L1 expressionDuration of responseT cell subpopulationsSabatolimab in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs) Was Safe in Patients (Pts) with Intermediate-, High-, or Very-High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
Garcia-Manero G, Lyons R, Nandal S, Ashraf M, Thellaboina R, Ruckel-Kumar J, Menssen H, Zeidan A. Sabatolimab in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs) Was Safe in Patients (Pts) with Intermediate-, High-, or Very-High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). Blood 2023, 142: 4606. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-186490.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeAdverse eventsHematologic improvementPartial remissionMyelodysplastic syndromeHypomethylating agentMarrow CRInterim analysisStable diseaseData cutoffLast doseInternational Prognostic Scoring System criteriaResponse rateCount decreaseCycle 1 day 1Second-line treatment optionExtension phaseHematologic adverse eventsNeutrophil count decreaseOral hypomethylating agentPhase Ib studySerious adverse eventsFatal adverse eventsMonths of treatmentSingle-arm studyImpact of Genomic Landscape and Mutational Burden on Primary Endpoint Responses in the COMMANDS Study
Komrokji R, Guerrero M, Garcia-Manero G, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Hayati S, Vodala S. Impact of Genomic Landscape and Mutational Burden on Primary Endpoint Responses in the COMMANDS Study. Blood 2023, 142: 4591. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178689.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsSuperior clinical benefitLR-MDSClinical benefitSimilar response ratesResponse rateRisk groupsMutational burdenGene mutationsRing sideroblastsRed blood cell transfusionInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemShorter leukemia-free survivalBaseline erythropoietin levelsComparable clinical benefitFavorable clinical benefitBlood cell transfusionLeukemia-free survivalProgression-free survivalSimilar clinical benefitsPrimary endpoint analysisPrognostic scoring systemBone marrow samplesSignificant differencesDriver gene mutations
2022
TP53-altered higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia: a distinct genetic entity with unique unmet needs
Ball S, Loghavi S, Zeidan A. TP53-altered higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia: a distinct genetic entity with unique unmet needs. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2022, 64: 540-550. PMID: 36323304, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2136969.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeVariant allele frequencyMyeloid leukemiaMDS/acute myeloid leukemiaIndependent poor prognostic factorBCL2 inhibitor venetoclaxPoor prognostic factorDisease-modifying therapiesIntensive chemotherapyBlast countClinical coursePrognostic factorsInvestigational agentsDisease entityClinical studiesInhibitor venetoclaxMyeloid neoplasmsResponse ratePathogenic alterationsNeoplasmsDistinct genetic entitiesLeukemiaGenetic characteristicsAllele frequenciesVenetoclax-based salvage therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia previously treated with FLT3 or IDH1/2 inhibitors
Bewersdorf JP, Shallis RM, Derkach A, Goldberg AD, Stein A, Stein EM, Marcucci G, Zeidan AM, Shimony S, DeAngelo DJ, Stone RM, Aldoss I, Ball BJ, Stahl M. Venetoclax-based salvage therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia previously treated with FLT3 or IDH1/2 inhibitors. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2022, 64: 188-196. PMID: 36287540, PMCID: PMC9905301, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2136952.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaSalvage therapyIDH1/2 inhibitorsIDH2 inhibitorsMyeloid leukemiaResponse rateRefractory acute myeloid leukemiaEffective salvage therapyLow-dose cytarabineMedian overall survivalRetrospective cohort studyOverall response rateLow response rateCohort studyOverall survivalAML patientsTreatment optionsFLT3 inhibitorsITD mutationPatientsTherapyFLT3Little dataVenetoclaxInhibitorsEfficacy of FLT3 and IDH1/2 inhibitors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia previously treated with venetoclax
Bewersdorf JP, Shallis RM, Derkach A, Goldberg AD, Stein A, Stein EM, Marcucci G, Zeidan AM, Shimony S, DeAngelo DJ, Stone RM, Aldoss I, Ball BJ, Stahl M. Efficacy of FLT3 and IDH1/2 inhibitors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia previously treated with venetoclax. Leukemia Research 2022, 122: 106942. PMID: 36108424, DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106942.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaIDH2 inhibitorsMyeloid leukemiaResponse rateRetrospective cohort studyOverall response rateRAS pathway mutationsNovel therapeutic strategiesMedian OSR AMLCohort studyShorter OSLandmark trialsTargeted agentsFrontline treatmentMutant FLT3Combination therapyTreatment optionsIDH1/2 inhibitorsDisease progressionTherapeutic strategiesPatientsSmall molecule inhibitorsVenetoclaxTherapyA randomized phase 2 trial of azacitidine with or without durvalumab as first-line therapy for older patients with AML
Zeidan AM, Boss I, Beach C, Copeland WB, Thompson E, Fox BA, Hasle VE, Hellmann A, Taussig D, Tormo M, Voso MT, Cavenagh J, O'Connor T, Previtali A, Rose S, Silverman LR. A randomized phase 2 trial of azacitidine with or without durvalumab as first-line therapy for older patients with AML. Blood Advances 2022, 6: 2219-2229. PMID: 34933333, PMCID: PMC9006260, DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006138.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaFirst-line therapyOlder patientsDay 1First-line combination therapyTreatment-emergent adverse eventsRandomized phase 2 trialSafety of durvalumabNew safety signalsPD-L1 expressionPhase 2 studyPhase 2 trialDuration of responseOverall response rateDurvalumab 1500Adverse eventsOverall survivalClinical efficacyCombination therapyMyeloid leukemiaSafety signalsTreatment responseCombination treatmentAzacitidineResponse rate
2021
Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Clonal Cytopenias of Undetermined Significance: A Large Retrospective Multi-Center International Study
Xie Z, Hyun M, Komrokji R, Zeidan A, Madanat Y, Zeidner J, Coombs C, Griffiths E, Lai C, Kishtagari A, Foran J, Badar T, Yi C, Desai P, Ades L, Osman A, Taylor J, Deeg H, Brunner A, Carraway H, Al Ali N, Bewersdorf J, Prebet T, Singh A, Tsai C, Chandhok N, Soong D, Patnaik M, Savona M, Al-Kali A. Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Clonal Cytopenias of Undetermined Significance: A Large Retrospective Multi-Center International Study. Blood 2021, 138: 2158. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-146254.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinical Trials CommitteeProgression-free survivalIndependent review committeeOverall survivalTrials CommitteeDisease progressionBristol-Myers SquibbMyeloid neoplasmsResponse rateFunctional pathway analysisSpeakers bureauUndetermined significanceMultivariable modelClonal cytopeniaReview CommitteeMedian progression-free survivalBoehringer IngelheimAdvisory CommitteeMulti-centre international studyCG abnormalitiesCox proportional hazards modelGene panelDaiichi SankyoBaseline clinical dataKaplan-Meier methodEnasidenib plus azacitidine versus azacitidine alone in patients with newly diagnosed, mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukaemia (AG221-AML-005): a single-arm, phase 1b and randomised, phase 2 trial
DiNardo CD, Schuh AC, Stein EM, Montesinos P, Wei AH, de Botton S, Zeidan AM, Fathi AT, Kantarjian HM, Bennett JM, Frattini MG, Martin-Regueira P, Lersch F, Gong J, Hasan M, Vyas P, Döhner H. Enasidenib plus azacitidine versus azacitidine alone in patients with newly diagnosed, mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukaemia (AG221-AML-005): a single-arm, phase 1b and randomised, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2021, 22: 1597-1608. PMID: 34672961, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00494-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAminopyridinesAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAzacitidineDrug Administration ScheduleDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMutationProgression-Free SurvivalRandom AllocationTreatment OutcomeTriazinesConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaSerious treatment-related adverse eventsTreatment-related adverse eventsDose-finding portionOverall response rateMyeloid leukemiaAdverse eventsFebrile neutropeniaCombination groupInterim analysisEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusCommon treatment-related grade 3Response rateInteractive web response systemTreatment-related grade 3Phase 1b/2 trialPrespecified interim analysisTreatment-related deathsPhase 2 trialWeb response systemPhase 2Acute myeloid leukemia subtypesPhase 2 portionBristol-Myers SquibbAzacitidine monotherapy
2020
Phase 1 dose escalation trial of volasertib in combination with decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia
Cortes J, Podoltsev N, Kantarjian H, Borthakur G, Zeidan AM, Stahl M, Taube T, Fagan N, Rajeswari S, Uy GL. Phase 1 dose escalation trial of volasertib in combination with decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. International Journal Of Hematology 2020, 113: 92-99. PMID: 32951163, DOI: 10.1007/s12185-020-02994-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Cycle ProteinsDecitabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFebrile NeutropeniaFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleGene ExpressionHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPteridinesTreatment OutcomeConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaMyeloid leukemiaCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsPhase 1 dose-escalation trialTreatment-emergent adverse eventsMTD of volasertibObjective response rateAdverse event profileDose-escalation trialPhase 1 trialAnti-leukemic activityPolo-like kinase 1Febrile neutropeniaEscalation trialAdverse eventsCell cycle kinase inhibitorsAML patientsEvent profilePoor prognosisResponse ratePatientsVolasertibDecitabineKinase inhibitorsNumerous cancersEffect of enasidenib (ENA) plus azacitidine (AZA) on complete remission and overall response versus AZA monotherapy in mutant -IDH2 ( mIDH2 ) newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML).
Dinardo C, Schuh A, Stein E, Montesinos P, Wei A, De Botton S, Zeidan A, Fathi A, Quek L, Kantarjian H, Frattini M, Lersch F, Gong J, Franovic A, Vyas P, Dohner H. Effect of enasidenib (ENA) plus azacitidine (AZA) on complete remission and overall response versus AZA monotherapy in mutant -IDH2 ( mIDH2 ) newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 7501-7501. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.7501.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOverall response rateDuration of responseGrade 3Randomized phase I/II studyPhase I/II studyResponse rateIDH differentiation syndromePoor-risk cytogeneticsComplete remission rateIntermediate-risk cytogeneticsEvent-free survivalPhase II portionImproved response ratesAcute myeloid leukemiaMost common reasonsMutant IDH2AZA monotherapyDifferentiation syndromeECOG PSFebrile neutropeniaIntensive chemotherapyMedian EFSMedian OSPt ageComplete remission
2019
Enasidenib Plus Azacitidine Significantly Improves Complete Remission and Overall Response Compared with Azacitidine Alone in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) Mutations: Interim Phase II Results from an Ongoing, Randomized Study
DiNardo C, Schuh A, Stein E, Fernandez P, Wei A, De Botton S, Zeidan A, Fathi A, Quek L, Kantarjian H, Frattini M, Lersch F, Gong J, Franovic A, MacBeth K, Vyas P, Döhner H. Enasidenib Plus Azacitidine Significantly Improves Complete Remission and Overall Response Compared with Azacitidine Alone in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) Mutations: Interim Phase II Results from an Ongoing, Randomized Study. Blood 2019, 134: 643. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-130362.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOverall response rateAcute myeloid leukemiaDuration of responseMorphologic leukemia-free stateBone marrow mononuclear cellsAZA armComplete remissionIntensive chemotherapyCelgene CorporationResponse rateDaiichi SankyoVariant allele frequencySpeakers bureauPTC TherapeuticsPartial remissionData cutoffGrade 3Phase I/II studyMedian DORAdvisory CommitteeSeattle GeneticsForty-sevenConventional care regimensIDH differentiation syndromePoor-risk cytogenetics
2018
More is less, less is more, or does it really matter? The curious case of impact of azacitidine administration schedules on outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Shallis RM, Zeidan AM. More is less, less is more, or does it really matter? The curious case of impact of azacitidine administration schedules on outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. BMC Hematology 2018, 18: 4. PMID: 29435332, PMCID: PMC5796398, DOI: 10.1186/s12878-018-0095-2.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeMyelodysplastic syndromeAcute myeloid leukemiaAdministration scheduleOverall survivalLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesAlternative administration schedulesOutcomes of patientsAlternative dosing schedulesRisk of progressionMeaningful clinical responsesAgent azacitidineAZA-001Clinical responseConventional careDosing schedulesPeripheral cytopeniasProspective studyClinical trialsHematologic disordersMyeloid leukemiaMost trialsResponse ratePatientsSystematic review
2016
Differential response to hypomethylating agents based on sex: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium (MDS CRC)*
DeZern AE, Zeidan AM, Barnard J, Hand W, Al Ali N, Brown F, Zimmerman C, Roboz GJ, Garcia-Manero G, Steensma DP, Komrokji RS, Sekeres MA. Differential response to hypomethylating agents based on sex: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium (MDS CRC)*. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2016, 58: 1325-1331. PMID: 27774847, PMCID: PMC5394924, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1246726.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeMyelodysplastic syndromeOverall survivalFemale patientsMDS Clinical Research ConsortiumLonger median OSFirst-line therapyClinical Research ConsortiumMedian OSBetter OSPatient sexCytidine deaminase activityPatientsResponse rateDifferential response ratesSignificant differencesSexResearch ConsortiumDeaminase activityDifferential responseBiological reasonsSyndromeTherapyDecitabineDifferences
2015
Azacitidine with or without Entinostat for the treatment of therapy‐related myeloid neoplasm: further results of the E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup study
Prebet T, Sun Z, Ketterling RP, Zeidan A, Greenberg P, Herman J, Juckett M, Smith MR, Malick L, Paietta E, Czader M, Figueroa M, Gabrilove J, Erba HP, Tallman MS, Litzow M, Gore SD, intergroup T. Azacitidine with or without Entinostat for the treatment of therapy‐related myeloid neoplasm: further results of the E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup study. British Journal Of Haematology 2015, 172: 384-391. PMID: 26577691, PMCID: PMC4794257, DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13832.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAzacitidineBenzamidesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPyridinesTreatment OutcomeConceptsTherapy-related myeloid neoplasmsMyeloid neoplasmsDe novo MDS/AMLRandomized phase 2 studyCombination of azacitidineLeukemia intergroup studyMedian overall survivalPhase 2 studyMDS/AMLSerious late effectsHistone deacetylase inhibitor entinostatAZA monotherapyCombination armNormalization rateOverall survivalIntergroup studyTreatment of cancerPoor responseLate effectsMedian numberAzacitidinePatientsSingle agentResponse rateConventional treatmentLenalidomide Treatment for Lower Risk Nondeletion 5q Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients Yields Higher Response Rates When Used Before Azacitidine
Zeidan AM, Ali N, Padron E, Lancet J, List A, Komrokji RS. Lenalidomide Treatment for Lower Risk Nondeletion 5q Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients Yields Higher Response Rates When Used Before Azacitidine. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2015, 15: 705-710. PMID: 26440749, DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.08.083.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesFirst-line therapyErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsFailure of treatmentTreatment failureInternational Working Group 2006 criteriaResponse rateSecond-line therapyMyelodysplastic syndrome patientsHigh response rateChromosome 5q deletionAzacitidine useHematologic improvementLenalidomide treatmentOverall survivalAnemic patientsMyelodysplastic syndromeSyndrome patientsLarge cohortLenalidomideAzacitidinePatientsLeukemic progressionClinical databaseTherapyPatterns of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis During Treatment of Acute Leukemia: Results of a North American Web-Based Survey
Lee EJ, Smith BD, Merrey JW, Lee AI, Podoltsev NA, Barbarotta L, Litzow MR, Prebet T, Luger SM, Gore S, Streiff MB, Zeidan AM. Patterns of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis During Treatment of Acute Leukemia: Results of a North American Web-Based Survey. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2015, 15: 766-770.e4. PMID: 26363982, PMCID: PMC4663156, DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.07.637.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVenous thromboembolismAcute leukemiaVTE prophylaxisPrevention of VTEPharmacologic VTE prophylaxisVenous thromboembolism prophylaxisEvidence-based guidelinesHigh-quality studiesConsolidation therapyPharmacologic prophylaxisThromboembolism prophylaxisNorth American providersVTE preventionSignificant morbidityProspective studyPatient populationHigh riskProphylaxisLower riskResponse ratePatientsWeb-based surveyLeukemiaSpectrum of practicesAmerican providers
2013
Azacitidine With Or Without Entinostat For The Treatment Of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasm: Further Results Of The E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup Study
Prebet T, Sun Z, Ketterling R, Greenberg P, Zeidan A, Litzow M, Gabrilove J, Erba H, Paietta E, Czader M, Gore S, Tallman M. Azacitidine With Or Without Entinostat For The Treatment Of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasm: Further Results Of The E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup Study. Blood 2013, 122: 2777. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v122.21.2777.2777.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTherapy-related myeloid neoplasmsAcute myeloid leukemiaAZA monotherapyMyeloid neoplasmsResponse rateRisk cytogeneticsCombination armMyeloid leukemiaDe novo MDS/AMLRandomized phase 2 studyECOG PS 0Higher risk MDSLeukemia intergroup studyMost prospective trialsNovo MDS patientsT-MN patientsUnfavorable-risk cytogeneticsUse of azacitidineIntermediate-risk cytogeneticsMedian overall survivalHigh-risk patientsPhase 2 studyPoor prognosis subgroupStem cell transplantPeripheral blood counts