2024
Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes
REDDY U, SANDOVAL G, TITA A, SILVER R, MALLETT G, Hill K, EL-SAYED Y, RICE M, WAPNER R, ROUSE D, SAADE G, THORP J, CHAUHAN S, COSTANTINE M, CHIEN E, CASEY B, SRINIVAS S, SWAMY G, SIMHAN H, MACONES G, GROBMAN W, Network E. Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes. American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2024, 6: 101508. PMID: 39357802, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101508.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInduction of laborLow-risk nulliparous patientsOxytocin regimensAdjusted relative risksAdjusted odds ratiosCesarean deliveryComposite of perinatal deathConfidence intervalsNeonatal respiratory supportLow-dose regimensHigh-dose oxytocin regimenSevere neonatal complicationsOperative vaginal delivery rateFrequency of cesarean deliverySecondary analysisEstimate adjusted relative risksElective induction of laborPerinatal deathRoutine induction of labourEstimate adjusted odds ratiosVaginal delivery rateRespiratory supportNulliparous patientsMHD groupMultivariable Poisson regressionInduction of labor versus expectant management among low-risk patients with one prior cesarean delivery
Ukoha E, Wen T, Reddy U. Induction of labor versus expectant management among low-risk patients with one prior cesarean delivery. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2024 PMID: 38852849, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInduction of laborNeonatal morbidity compositeOperative vaginal deliveryMaternal morbidity compositeVaginal deliveryExposure of interestCesarean deliveryIntensive care unit admissionMorbidity compositeWeeks 6 daysWeeks 0 daysExpectant management groupLow-risk patientsPeripartum hysterectomyUterine ruptureLikelihood of vaginal deliveryRate of uterine ruptureUnit admissionElective induction of laborLog-binomial regression modelsBirth certificate dataConfidence intervalsExpectant managementAssociated with increased likelihoodNeonatal morbidity outcomes
2023
Outcomes of induction vs prelabor cesarean delivery at <33 weeks for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Bushman E, Grobman W, Bailit J, Reddy U, Wapner R, Varner M, Thorp J, Caritis S, Prasad M, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse D, Blackwell S, Tolosa J, Network E. Outcomes of induction vs prelabor cesarean delivery at <33 weeks for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2023, 5: 101032. PMID: 37244639, PMCID: PMC10521213, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrelabor cesarean deliveryHypertensive disordersInduction of laborCesarean deliveryLabor inductionNeonatal morbidityInduction groupMedian durationVaginal deliveryWeeks' gestationSecondary analysisAdverse composite outcomeComposite maternal morbidityOutcome of inductionPreterm hypertensive disordersHalf of patientsCesarean delivery groupLength of inductionOptimal delivery approachMaternal morbidityComposite outcomeFetal malpresentationMultiple gestationsPreterm birthSecondary outcomes
2018
Nonmedically Indicated Induction in Morbidly Obese Women is Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Cesarean Delivery
Kawakita T, Iqbal S, Huang C, Reddy U. Nonmedically Indicated Induction in Morbidly Obese Women is Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Cesarean Delivery. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 2018, 38: 125-126. DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000542343.43890.b0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInduction of laborMorbidly obese womenCesarean deliveryObese womenExpectant managementClass III obesityRetrospective cohort studyNormal-weight womenIndicated inductionMaternal comorbiditiesMorbid obesityNeonatal outcomesCohort studySecondary outcomesWeeks' gestationRisk factorsHigh prevalenceClass IIObesityWomenComorbiditiesInductionOutcomesDeliveryRisk
2017
Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Delivery and Obstetric Intervention for Pregnancies Affected by Spina Bifida [19R]
Spiliopoulos M, Iqbal S, Reddy U, Landy H, Huang C. Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Delivery and Obstetric Intervention for Pregnancies Affected by Spina Bifida [19R]. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2017, 129: 188s. DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000514163.09127.5e.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImmediate neonatal outcomeNeonatal outcomesCesarean deliveryMode of deliveryVaginal deliverySpina bifidaInduced laborLabor induction groupRetrospective cohort studyPrevious cesarean deliveryInduction of laborMultivariable logistic regressionWeeks of gestationYears of ageSafe Labor studyNICU admissionCesarean sectionCohort studyRespiratory morbiditySingleton pregnanciesSpontaneous laborBreech deliveryGestational ageObstetric interventionsBirth traumaRoute of Delivery in Women With Stillbirth
Boyle A, Preslar JP, Hogue CJ, Silver RM, Reddy UM, Goldenberg RL, Stoll BJ, Varner MW, Conway DL, Saade GR, Bukowski R, Dudley DJ. Route of Delivery in Women With Stillbirth. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2017, 129: 693-698. PMID: 28333794, PMCID: PMC5370197, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001935.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrior cesarean deliveryCesarean deliveryObstetric indicationsSingleton stillbirthsUterine ruptureMulticenter case seriesRepeat cesarean deliveryRetrospective chart reviewInduction of laborWeeks of gestationRoute of deliveryMode of deliveryLabor inductionSecondary outcomesChart reviewIntrapartum stillbirthPrimary outcomeSpontaneous laborVaginal deliveryCase seriesMedical recordsTotal casesStillbirthWomenDelivery information652: Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with non-medically indicated induction of labor at term compared with expectant management in morbidly obese women
Kawakita T, Iqbal S, Huang C, Reddy U. 652: Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with non-medically indicated induction of labor at term compared with expectant management in morbidly obese women. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2017, 216: s383. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.386.Peer-Reviewed Original Research