2020
Contraception and ectopic pregnancy risk: a prospective observational analysis
Schultheis P, Montoya M, Zhao Q, Archer J, Madden T, Peipert J. Contraception and ectopic pregnancy risk: a prospective observational analysis. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2020, 224: 228-229. PMID: 33049248, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansIntrauterine Devices, CopperIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetatePregnancyPregnancy, EctopicProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTransdermal Patch
2019
Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice
Paul R, Huysman B, Maddipati R, Madden T. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2019, 222: s884.e1-s884.e9. PMID: 31838124, PMCID: PMC7781163, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanChoice BehaviorContraceptive Agents, HormonalContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansIntrauterine DevicesLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMarital StatusMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecognition, PsychologyWhite PeopleYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsContraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceDepo-medroxyprogesteroneContraceptive choicesReversible contraceptionDepo-medroxyprogesterone acetateHealth center populationHealthcare provider visitsHormonal intrauterine deviceHigh acceptabilityMultivariable Poisson regressionQualified health centersPreference-sensitive decisionsReversible contraception methodsCopper intrauterine deviceInterviewer-administered surveySpecific contraceptive methodsChi-square testProvider visitsContraceptive counselingContraceptive careHealth centersContraception methodsContraceptive methods
2016
Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception
dos Santos P, Madden T, Omvig K, Peipert J. Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception 2016, 95: 382-389. PMID: 28041992, PMCID: PMC5376505, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsENG implant usersCopper IUD usersLNG-IUSBody compositionBody weightIUD usersCopper IUDImplant usersWeight gainProspective cohort studyLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemSubgroup of womenBody composition changesLean body massLNG-IUS usersCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectBody massCohort studyENG implantHealthy womenIntrauterine systemMean ageBlack raceInclusion criteria
2014
Performance of a checklist to exclude pregnancy at the time of contraceptive initiation among women with a negative urine pregnancy test
Min J, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J, Madden T. Performance of a checklist to exclude pregnancy at the time of contraceptive initiation among women with a negative urine pregnancy test. Contraception 2014, 91: 80-84. PMID: 25218500, PMCID: PMC4267981, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.08.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChecklistCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraindicationsDrug ImplantsFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansIllinoisIntrauterine DevicesLuteal PhaseMiddle AgedMissouriPatient CompliancePregnancyPregnancy TestsPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultConceptsNegative urine pregnancy testUrine pregnancy testLuteal phase pregnanciesNegative predictive valuePregnancy checklistPregnancy testPositive predictive valuePredictive valueContraceptive initiationEarly pregnancyPositive urine pregnancy testHigh negative predictive valueInitiation of contraceptionSame-day initiationUrine pregnancy testingDays of enrollmentProspective cohort studyShort acting methodsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyPositive screenReversible contraceptionPatient historyIntrauterine devicePregnancy testing
2013
Characteristics Associated With Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Within the First 6 Months of Use
Grunloh D, Casner T, Secura G, Peipert J, Madden T. Characteristics Associated With Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Within the First 6 Months of Use. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2013, 122: 1214-1221. PMID: 24201685, PMCID: PMC4051392, DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000435452.86108.59.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemIntrauterine deviceEarly discontinuationCopper intrauterine deviceBaseline characteristicsIntrauterine systemReversible contraceptionFirst-line contraceptive optionRate of discontinuationLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionLow socioeconomic statusContraceptive CHOICE ProjectMonths of useCohort studyDiscontinuation ratesContraceptive optionsUnintended pregnancyFrequent bleedingDiscontinuationIUD usersCost contraceptionCommon reasonYounger ageLogistic regressionTelephone interviewsWeight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods
Vickery Z, Madden T, Zhao Q, Secura G, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Weight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods. Contraception 2013, 88: 503-508. PMID: 23582238, PMCID: PMC3951762, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.03.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleDelayed-Action PreparationsDesogestrelDrug ImplantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMissouriProgestinsProspective StudiesUrban HealthWeight GainYoung Adult
2012
Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.
Madden T, Eisenberg D, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J. Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1053-9. PMID: 23090522, PMCID: PMC3711380, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182632cd6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContinuation ratesSubdermal implantsInterval placementCox proportional hazards modelInterval insertionHigh discontinuation ratesProportional hazards modelContraceptive CHOICE ProjectDiscontinuation ratesIrregular bleedingReversible contraceptivesUnplanned pregnancyCommon reasonHazards modelInduced abortionSurvival analysisInterval groupSecondary analysisStudy periodKaplan-Meier estimatorWomenCHOICE ProjectEtonogestrelHigh ratePostabortionContraceptive Failure Rates of Etonogestrel Subdermal Implants in Overweight and Obese Women
Xu H, Wade J, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G. Contraceptive Failure Rates of Etonogestrel Subdermal Implants in Overweight and Obese Women. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 21-26. PMID: 22678035, PMCID: PMC4043143, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318259565a.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsObese womenContraceptive failure ratesIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive methodLarge prospective cohort studyKaplan-Meier survival curvesActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsUrine pregnancy testingProspective cohort studyBody mass indexEtonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implantEtonogestrel subdermal implantSubdermal contraceptive implantFailure rateReversible contraceptive methodsT-testContraceptive CHOICE ProjectStudent's t-testReliable birth control methodsBirth control methodsCohort studyCumulative failure rateNormal weightMass indexEffectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner B, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. New England Journal Of Medicine 2012, 366: 1998-2007. PMID: 22621627, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1110855.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesContraceptionContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansInjectionsIntrauterine DevicesMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive methodsLarge prospective cohort studyActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsProspective cohort studyContraceptive failure ratesReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionDMPA injectionOverall cohortCohort studyRate of failureContraceptive pillsContraceptive failurePregnancyYoung womenContraceptionPillsOlder participantsAgeFailure rateParticipantsRisk
2011
Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion
Madden T, Secura G, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion. Contraception 2011, 84: 571-577. PMID: 22078185, PMCID: PMC3563318, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011, 84: 493-498. PMID: 22018123, PMCID: PMC3505875, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectIntrauterine deviceLARC methodsCHOICE ProjectActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsReversible contraception useReversible contraceptive methodsAssociation of ageNon-LARC methodsAdolescent participantsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionHigh riskContraception useContraceptive methodsAdolescent womenYounger groupLARCLittle dataAdolescentsWomenAgeParticipantsAssociationYears
2010
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Mullersman J, Peipert J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2010, 203: 115.e1-115.e7. PMID: 20541171, PMCID: PMC2910826, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCost SavingsCost-Benefit AnalysisDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPregnancyProbabilityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionReversible methodFirst-line contraceptive optionProspective cohort studyPercent of womenCHOICE ProjectBaseline characteristicsCohort studyWomen 14Contraceptive optionsIntrauterine contraceptionSubdermal implantsContraceptive methodsContraceptive choicesContraceptionWomenFinancial barriersPotential participantsTwo-thirdsParticipantsPercentPregnancyOptionsYears