2023
Improvement in contraceptive knowledge after using an online educational resource
Kus L, Paul R, Nigaglioni Rivera A, Zeal C, Madden T. Improvement in contraceptive knowledge after using an online educational resource. Contraception 2023, 126: 110095. PMID: 37331460, PMCID: PMC10760799, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110095.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
Young women's preferences for contraceptive education: The importance of the clinician in three U.S. health centers in 2017-2018
Zeal C, Paul R, Dorsey M, Politi M, Madden T. Young women's preferences for contraceptive education: The importance of the clinician in three U.S. health centers in 2017-2018. Contraception 2021, 104: 553-555. PMID: 34139152, PMCID: PMC9118463, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsContraceptive DevicesEducational StatusFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult
2019
Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design
Madden T, Paul R, Maddipati R, Buckel C, Goodman M, Peipert J. Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design. Contraception 2019, 100: 196-201. PMID: 31132346, PMCID: PMC6699922, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnplannedProgram EvaluationProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationUnintended pregnancy ratesUnintended pregnancyProvider educationContraceptive counselingLARC methodsContraceptive carePregnancy rateHealth centersCox proportional hazards regressionPerson baseline surveyKaplan-Meier survival functionProportional hazards regressionQualified health centersReversible contraceptive methodsTime-trend designUsual carePregnancy outcomesUninsured womenPatient counselingEnhanced careComprehensive counselingReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionCenter careEffect of staff training and cost support on provision of long-acting reversible contraception in community health centers
Buckel C, Maddipati R, Goodman M, Peipert J, Madden T. Effect of staff training and cost support on provision of long-acting reversible contraception in community health centers. Contraception 2019, 99: 222-227. PMID: 30685287, PMCID: PMC6639006, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.12.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorCounselingFemaleHumansLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationSame-day insertionContraceptive counselingProvider educationHealth centersUsual careEnhanced careReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionContraceptive methodsHealth center populationSame-day initiationQualified health centersRobust error varianceCommunity health centersContraceptive CHOICE ProjectProportion of womenUninsured womenLARC insertionProvider appointmentsRelative riskProvider practicesCare modelPoisson regressionVs. 13.7
2015
Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices
Diedrich J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 213: 822.e1-822.e6. PMID: 26409157, PMCID: PMC4679676, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.077.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsYears of ageCu-intrauterine devicesIntrauterine deviceLNG intrauterine deviceMonth continuation ratesProspective cohort studyCox proportional hazardsSubsequent contraceptive useCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectLess discontinuationMenstrual profileMonths continuationCohort studyHazard ratioPrimary outcomeMultivariable analysisPregnancy historyContinuation ratesContraceptive useIUD continuationDiscontinuationProportional hazardsSurvival analysisLevonorgestrelContraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease
Lindley K, Madden T, Cahill A, Ludbrook P, Billadello J. Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 126: 363-369. PMID: 26241427, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000911.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAttitude to HealthContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansIntrauterine DevicesNeeds AssessmentPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPregnancy, UnplannedReproductive HistorySex CounselingSexual BehaviorUnited StatesConceptsCongenital heart diseaseHeart diseaseUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive useCongenital heart disease clinicCross-sectional studyTime of conceptionDisease clinicPrimary outcomeTotal pregnanciesPregnancy historyActive womenIntrauterine deviceCardiology practiceContraceptive methodsHigh incidenceSubdermal implantsContraception useMost womenPregnancySpecific counselingContraceptionDiseaseWomenAdolescent Experiences With Intrauterine Devices: A Qualitative Study
Schmidt E, James A, Curran K, Peipert J, Madden T. Adolescent Experiences With Intrauterine Devices: A Qualitative Study. Journal Of Adolescent Health 2015, 57: 381-386. PMID: 26126950, PMCID: PMC4583802, DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.05.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchThe role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making
Madden T, Secura G, Nease R, Politi M, Peipert J. The role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 213: 46.e1-46.e6. PMID: 25644443, PMCID: PMC4485538, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2012
Dual Protection Use to Prevent STIs and Unintended Pregnancy
Sales J, Whiteman M, Kottke M, Madden T, DiClemente R. Dual Protection Use to Prevent STIs and Unintended Pregnancy. Infectious Diseases In Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 2012: 972689. PMID: 22536011, PMCID: PMC3320009, DOI: 10.1155/2012/972689.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedSexually Transmitted Diseases
2011
Baseline Correlates of Inconsistent and Incorrect Condom Use Among Sexually Active Women in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Shih S, Kebodeaux C, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Peipert J. Baseline Correlates of Inconsistent and Incorrect Condom Use Among Sexually Active Women in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2011, 38: 1012-1019. PMID: 21992976, PMCID: PMC3192989, DOI: 10.1097/olq.0b013e318225f8c3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorCohort StudiesCondomsContraception BehaviorContraceptive DevicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousProspective StudiesRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsIncorrect condom useMore sex actsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCondom useActive womenInconsistent condom useCHOICE ProjectLow condom useSex actsCorrect condom useFuture STIsProspective cohortBaseline correlatesUnivariate analysisRelative riskUnintended pregnancyHigh riskPrevention strategiesPoisson regressionUnprotected actsYounger ageWomenFirst intercourseBaseline dataPregnancyComparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion
Madden T, Secura G, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion. Contraception 2011, 84: 571-577. PMID: 22078185, PMCID: PMC3563318, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.018.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data
Kittur N, Secura G, Peipert J, Madden T, Finer L, Allsworth J. Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data. Contraception 2010, 83: 479-485. PMID: 21477693, PMCID: PMC3074095, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemContraception BehaviorData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMissouriPrevalenceUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemTime of enrollmentContraceptive CHOICE ProjectMissouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemPrevalence estimatesRisk Factor Surveillance SystemContraceptive pill usersReversible contraception useCurrent contraceptive methodCHOICE ProjectNational surveyLARC usePill usersContraceptive useContraceptive methodsContraception useContraceptive prevalenceStudy participantsDemographic characteristicsChoices participantsSurvey weightsNational dataEnrollmentHigh rateLower ratesThe Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Mullersman J, Peipert J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2010, 203: 115.e1-115.e7. PMID: 20541171, PMCID: PMC2910826, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCost SavingsCost-Benefit AnalysisDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPregnancyProbabilityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionReversible methodFirst-line contraceptive optionProspective cohort studyPercent of womenCHOICE ProjectBaseline characteristicsCohort studyWomen 14Contraceptive optionsIntrauterine contraceptionSubdermal implantsContraceptive methodsContraceptive choicesContraceptionWomenFinancial barriersPotential participantsTwo-thirdsParticipantsPercentPregnancyOptionsYears