2018
Ulipristal Acetate for Unscheduled Bleeding in Etonogestrel Implant Users
Zigler R, Madden T, Ashby C, Wan L, McNicholas C. Ulipristal Acetate for Unscheduled Bleeding in Etonogestrel Implant Users. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2018, 132: 888-894. PMID: 30130351, PMCID: PMC6153077, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002810.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleDesogestrelFemaleHumansNorpregnadienesUterine HemorrhageYoung AdultConceptsEtonogestrel implant usersUlipristal acetateImplant usersIdentical-appearing placeboPlacebo-controlled trialSerum progesterone levelsUnscheduled bleedingBleeding profilePlacebo groupSecondary outcomesEnrolled participantsEligible participantsSerum progesteroneOvulatory potentialProgesterone levelsOvulation statusPlaceboU.S. FoodDemographic characteristicsWomenBleedingParticipant satisfactionEffect sizeDaysGroup
2016
Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception
dos Santos P, Madden T, Omvig K, Peipert J. Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception 2016, 95: 382-389. PMID: 28041992, PMCID: PMC5376505, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsENG implant usersCopper IUD usersLNG-IUSBody compositionBody weightIUD usersCopper IUDImplant usersWeight gainProspective cohort studyLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemSubgroup of womenBody composition changesLean body massLNG-IUS usersCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectBody massCohort studyENG implantHealthy womenIntrauterine systemMean ageBlack raceInclusion criteria
2014
Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy
Secura G, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel C, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy. New England Journal Of Medicine 2014, 371: 1316-1323. PMID: 25271604, PMCID: PMC4230891, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1400506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRate of pregnancyReversible contraceptionLARC methodsLarge prospective cohort studyTeenage pregnancyProspective cohort studyReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageTeenage girlsSame age groupHealth care costsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsPregnancyWomen 15Care costsAge groupsNational ratesContraceptionTeenage birthsExperienced teensBirth
2013
Weight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods
Vickery Z, Madden T, Zhao Q, Secura G, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Weight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods. Contraception 2013, 88: 503-508. PMID: 23582238, PMCID: PMC3951762, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.03.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleDelayed-Action PreparationsDesogestrelDrug ImplantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMissouriProgestinsProspective StudiesUrban HealthWeight GainYoung Adult
2012
Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.
Madden T, Eisenberg D, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J. Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1053-9. PMID: 23090522, PMCID: PMC3711380, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182632cd6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContinuation ratesSubdermal implantsInterval placementCox proportional hazards modelInterval insertionHigh discontinuation ratesProportional hazards modelContraceptive CHOICE ProjectDiscontinuation ratesIrregular bleedingReversible contraceptivesUnplanned pregnancyCommon reasonHazards modelInduced abortionSurvival analysisInterval groupSecondary analysisStudy periodKaplan-Meier estimatorWomenCHOICE ProjectEtonogestrelHigh ratePostabortionContraceptive Failure Rates of Etonogestrel Subdermal Implants in Overweight and Obese Women
Xu H, Wade J, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G. Contraceptive Failure Rates of Etonogestrel Subdermal Implants in Overweight and Obese Women. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 21-26. PMID: 22678035, PMCID: PMC4043143, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318259565a.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsObese womenContraceptive failure ratesIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive methodLarge prospective cohort studyKaplan-Meier survival curvesActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsUrine pregnancy testingProspective cohort studyBody mass indexEtonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implantEtonogestrel subdermal implantSubdermal contraceptive implantFailure rateReversible contraceptive methodsT-testContraceptive CHOICE ProjectStudent's t-testReliable birth control methodsBirth control methodsCohort studyCumulative failure rateNormal weightMass index