Need for evidence-based early intervention programmes: a public health perspective
Guloksuz S, van Os J. Need for evidence-based early intervention programmes: a public health perspective. BMJ Mental Health 2018, 21: 128. PMID: 30282627, PMCID: PMC10270415, DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Medical InterventionEvidence-Based MedicineHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePsychotic DisordersPublic HealthConceptsClinical high riskUltra-high riskPsychotic symptomsEarly intervention programsSpecific effective treatmentBroader prevention strategiesIntervention programsPositive psychotic symptomsPublic health impactPublic health perspectivePrognostic accuracyHelp-seeking populationEffective treatmentHigh riskPsychosis benefitPrevention strategiesRisk enrichmentPredictive valueTherapeutic interventionsMeta-analytical evidenceSymptomsHealth perspectiveEarly psychopathologyHealth impactsAssessment toolAn Economic Evaluation of Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Services for First-Episode Psychosis in the U.S. Public Sector.
Murphy SM, Kucukgoncu S, Bao Y, Li F, Tek C, Breitborde NJK, Guloksuz S, Phutane VH, Ozkan B, Pollard JM, Cahill JD, Woods SW, Cole RA, Schoenbaum M, Srihari VH. An Economic Evaluation of Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Services for First-Episode Psychosis in the U.S. Public Sector. The Journal Of Mental Health Policy And Economics 2018, 21: 123-130. PMID: 30530872, PMCID: PMC6314808.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSpecialty care servicesPatient costsEarly intervention servicesUsual treatmentSchizophrenia spectrum disordersMonth 12Economic evaluationCare servicesSTEP participantsCommunity mental health centerThird-party payer perspectiveIntervention servicesFirst-episode servicesMonths post randomizationHealthcare service utilizationMental health centersU.S. public sectorTeam-based careCost-offset analysisEligible patientsThird-party payersAntipsychotic exposureED visitsMonth 6Episode psychosis