2018
Response to Dobie et al. Letter, ‘Exchange Rate and Risk of Noise-induced Hearing Loss in Construction Workers’
Roberts B, Seixas N, Mukherjee B, Neitzel R. Response to Dobie et al. Letter, ‘Exchange Rate and Risk of Noise-induced Hearing Loss in Construction Workers’. Annals Of Work Exposures And Health 2018, 62: 1179-1181. PMID: 30346476, DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy085.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImputation of missing values in a large job exposure matrix using hierarchical information
Roberts B, Cheng W, Mukherjee B, Neitzel R. Imputation of missing values in a large job exposure matrix using hierarchical information. Journal Of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 2018, 28: 615-648. PMID: 29789667, PMCID: PMC9929916, DOI: 10.1038/s41370-018-0037-x.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2011
Occupational noise exposure assessment using O*NET and its application to a study of hearing loss in the US general population
Choi Y, Hu H, Tak S, Mukherjee B, Park S. Occupational noise exposure assessment using O*NET and its application to a study of hearing loss in the US general population. Occupational And Environmental Medicine 2011, 69: 176. PMID: 21725070, PMCID: PMC3277688, DOI: 10.1136/oem.2011.064758.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyPure-tone averageHearing lossNoise scoresGeneral populationStudy of hearing lossNoise-induced health effectsHealth and Nutrition Examination SurveyNutrition Examination SurveyNoise exposure assessmentUS general populationNoise exposure dataLogistic regression modelsHearing thresholdsOccupational noiseExamination SurveyExposure to soundExposure assessmentPotential confoundersEpidemiological researchScore quintilesQuintileAssessment toolOccupational categoriesEpidemiological evidence