2020
Interaction analysis under misspecification of main effects: Some common mistakes and simple solutions
Zhang M, Yu Y, Wang S, Salvatore M, Fritsche L, He Z, Mukherjee B. Interaction analysis under misspecification of main effects: Some common mistakes and simple solutions. Statistics In Medicine 2020, 39: 1675-1694. PMID: 32101638, DOI: 10.1002/sim.8505.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsType I error rateType I error inflationIndependence assumptionWald and score testsCorrect type I error ratesSandwich variance estimatorSandwich estimatorScore testVariance estimationSimulation studyMisspecificationMichigan Genomics InitiativeStatistical practiceBinary outcomesTested interactionsEmpirical factsFlexible modelData modelTest of interactionBiobank studyInflationAssumptionsContinuous outcomesEpidemiological literatureLinear regression models
2009
Graphical diagnostics to check model misspecification for the proportional odds regression model
Liu I, Mukherjee B, Suesse T, Sparrow D, Park S. Graphical diagnostics to check model misspecification for the proportional odds regression model. Statistics In Medicine 2009, 28: 412-429. PMID: 18693299, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3386.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCovariate effectsOrdinal responsesModel misspecificationProportional odds regression modelStudy covariate effectsGoodness-of-fit statisticsClass of modelsNumerical methodFunctional misspecificationBinary responsesGraphical diagnosticsSimulation studyCumulative logitsMisspecificationCumulative sumRegression modelsGraphical methodSumArbogastVA Normative Aging StudyCovariatesProportional odds regressionClass