2021
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Van den Eynde J, Sá M, De Groote S, Amabile A, Sicouri S, Ramlawi B, Torregrossa G, Oosterlinck W. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. IJC Heart & Vasculature 2021, 37: 100916. PMID: 34917749, PMCID: PMC8645443, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100916.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHybrid coronary revascularizationMultivessel coronary artery diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary revascularizationCoronary interventionMultivessel percutaneous coronary interventionExcellent long-term outcomesCENTRAL/CCTRHeart team discussionShort-term complicationsBetter patient selectionCoronary artery diseaseLong-term outcomesPubMed/MEDLINEOptimal target populationRate of mortalitySystematic database searchCerebrovascular eventsVessel revascularizationArtery diseaseCenter experiencePatient selectionMyocardial infarctionLower incidenceEarly recovery
2020
Multi‐arterial and total‐arterial coronary revascularization: Past, present, and future perspective
Torregrossa G, Amabile A, Williams EE, Fonceva A, Hosseinian L, Balkhy HH. Multi‐arterial and total‐arterial coronary revascularization: Past, present, and future perspective. Journal Of Cardiac Surgery 2020, 35: 1072-1081. PMID: 32293059, DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14537.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTotal arterial revascularizationSingle internal thoracic arteryTotal arterial coronary revascularizationSecond arterial conduitCoronary artery bypassInternal thoracic arteryArtery bypassCoronary revascularizationArterial conduitsThoracic arteryCurrent evidenceMEDLINE databaseComprehensive searchScientific evidenceRevascularizationPatientsTAR strategyArtery