A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort
Group M, Vasavada K, Vasavada V, Moran J, Devana S, Lee C, Hame S, Jazrawi L, Sherman O, Huston L, Haas A, Allen C, Cooper D, DeBerardino T, Spindler K, Stuart M, Amendola A, Annunziata C, Arciero R, Bach B, Baker C, Bartolozzi A, Baumgarten K, Berg J, Bernas G, Brockmeier S, Brophy R, Bush-Joseph C, Butler J, Carey J, Carpenter J, Cole B, Cooper J, Cox C, Creighton R, David T, Dunn W, Flanigan D, Frederick R, Ganley T, Gatt C, Gecha S, Giffin J, Hannafin J, Harris N, Hechtman K, Hershman E, Hoellrich R, Johnson D, Johnson T, Jones M, Kaeding C, Kamath G, Klootwyk T, Levy B, Benjamin C, Maiers G, Marx R, Matava M, Mathien G, McAllister D, McCarty E, McCormack R, Miller B, Nissen C, O’Neill D, Owens B, Parker R, Purnell M, Ramappa A, Rauh M, Rettig A, Sekiya J, Shea K, Slauterbeck J, Smith M, Spang J, Svoboda S, Taft T, Tenuta J, Tingstad E, Vidal A, Viskontas D, White R, Williams J, Wolcott M, Wolf B, Wright R, York J. A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort. Orthopaedic Journal Of Sports Medicine 2024, 12: 23259671241291920. PMID: 39555321, PMCID: PMC11565622, DOI: 10.1177/23259671241291920.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMulticenter ACL Revision StudyGraft failureRisk of graft failureAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionLogistic regressionFollow-up dataCruciate ligament reconstructionACL reconstruction failureLevel of evidencePatient-reported outcomesCohort dataIntraoperative findingsTibial tunnel sizesModerate predictive abilityReconstruction failureFollow-upGraft typeAllograft useCohort studyPreoperative radiographsLigament reconstructionRisk factorsCohortPatientsSevere Attrition and Poor Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Telerehabilitation vs. Standard In-Person Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
Vasavada K, Shankar D, Avila A, Mojica E, Hurley E, Lehane K, Buzin S, Oeding J, Stein S, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Alaia M, Strauss E, Jazrawi L, Campbell K. Severe Attrition and Poor Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Telerehabilitation vs. Standard In-Person Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions. Surgeries 2024, 5: 627-639. DOI: 10.3390/surgeries5030050.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIn-person rehabilitationAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionArthroscopic rotator cuff repairIn-personRandomized controlled trialsCruciate ligament reconstructionFunctional outcomesPatient satisfactionAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patientsRotator cuff repairFellowship-trained sports medicine surgeonsFollow-up surveyLigament reconstructionSports medicine surgeonsArthroscopic rotator cuff repair patientsHybrid in-personPost-operative visitCuff repairTelerehabilitation protocolSports medicine proceduresTelerehabilitationPoor satisfactionRehabilitationEnrollment goalsControlled trialsMedial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament reconstruction and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction have no significant differences in clinical outcomes for treatment of lateral patellar instability: a matched-cohort study
Shankar D, DeClouette B, Avila A, Vasavada K, Lan R, Strauss E, Jazrawi L, Alaia M, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Campbell K. Medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament reconstruction and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction have no significant differences in clinical outcomes for treatment of lateral patellar instability: a matched-cohort study. Journal Of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine 2024, 9: 502-509. PMID: 38490437, DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.03.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMedial patellofemoral ligament reconstructionMedial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament reconstructionVisual analog scalePatellofemoral ligament reconstructionMatched-cohort studyTibial tubercle osteotomyLateral patellar instabilityLigament reconstructionPatellar instabilityReturn to workClinical outcomesRate of recurrent patellar instabilityConcomitant tibial tubercle osteotomyRates of recurrent subluxationPostoperative visual analog scaleOsteochondral allograftsRecurrent lateral patellar instabilityRetrospective matched-cohort studyCompare clinical outcomesFollow-up timeFisher's exact testRecurrent patellar instabilityMann-Whitney U testReturn to sportP-value <