2024
Post-Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans
Kraguljac N, Bruns D, Appelbaum P, Botello E, King V, Remiszewski N, Widge A, Alpert J, Carpenter L, Grzenda A, Krystal J, McDonald W, Nemeroff C. Post-Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans. The Lancet Psychiatry 2024, 11: 853-862. PMID: 38795722, DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00096-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRoe v WadeAbortion banDobbs v Jackson Women's Health OrganizationUS Supreme Court rulingLiberalization of abortion lawsSupreme Court rulingPsychiatric careAbortion careConstitutional rightsCourt rulingsLegal landscapeAbortion lawsPsychiatric groundsPatient autonomyEthical conductBanEthical challengesPublic health consequencesEthical responsibilityPsychiatristsMedical necessityPracticing psychiatristsAbortionTopical overviewPersonal view
2016
Clinical Heterogeneity Arising from Categorical and Dimensional Features of the Neurobiology of Psychiatric Diagnoses: Insights from Neuroimaging and Computational Neuroscience
Krystal J, Anticevic A, Murray J, Glahn D, Driesen N, Yang G, Wang X. Clinical Heterogeneity Arising from Categorical and Dimensional Features of the Neurobiology of Psychiatric Diagnoses: Insights from Neuroimaging and Computational Neuroscience. 2016, 293-316. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10936.003.0023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPsychiatric disordersMechanisms of psychiatric disordersModel psychiatric disordersPsychiatric nosologyPsychological assessmentPsychiatric diagnosingModern psychiatryPsychiatric issuesNeurobiologyPsychiatristsNeurological analysisPsychiatryDisordersComputational neuroscienceClinical heterogeneityNeuroimagingNosologyNeuroscienceNeuroscientistsComputational neuroscientistsCategorization