Diastolic dysfunction evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived E, a, e’: Comparison to echocardiography
Lamy J, Xiang J, Shah N, Kwan J, Kim Y, Upadhyaya K, Reinhardt S, Meadows J, McNamara R, Baldassarre L, Peters D. Diastolic dysfunction evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived E, a, e’: Comparison to echocardiography. Physiological Reports 2024, 12: e70078. PMID: 39604208, PMCID: PMC11602526, DOI: 10.14814/phy2.70078.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiovascular magnetic resonanceTransthoracic echocardiographyDiastolic dysfunctionDiastolic functionDiagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonanceEvaluate diastolic dysfunctionCardiovascular magnetic resonance imagingLeft atrial volumeMitral annular velocityHealthy age-matched subjectsComparison to echocardiographyMitral inflow velocityEvaluate diastolic functionAge-matched subjectsPresence of DDAtrial volumeDD gradeFirst-lineAnnular velocityDiagnostic accuracyImaging modalitiesMagnetic resonanceEchocardiographyALLTransthoracicKiosk 5R-TB-01 Prospective Evaluation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis with Serial Quantitative Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Correlations with Cardiovascular Outcomes
Khattab M, Kwan J, Chehayeb R, Guajardo A, Lin D, Christophides A, Alkhatib D, Martinez C, Shah N, Im Y, Jeyashanmugaraja G, Ragheb E, Higgins A, Redheiul A, Salem J, Peters D, Mohjibian H, Baldassarre L. Kiosk 5R-TB-01 Prospective Evaluation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis with Serial Quantitative Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Correlations with Cardiovascular Outcomes. Journal Of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2024, 26: 100686. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.100686.Peer-Reviewed Original Research