2024
Integrating 4 methods to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (In4M): protocol for a prospective cohort study
Thanarajasingam G, Kluetz P, Bhatnagar V, Brown A, Cathcart-Rake E, Diamond M, Faust L, Fiero M, Huntington S, Jeffery M, Jones L, Noble B, Paludo J, Powers B, Ross J, Ritchie J, Ruddy K, Schellhorn S, Tarver M, Dueck A, Gross C. Integrating 4 methods to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (In4M): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2024, 14: e074030. PMID: 38199641, PMCID: PMC10806877, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPhysical function assessmentPhysical functionFunctional assessmentEvaluation of physical functionElectronic health record dataEvaluate physical functionHealth record dataSpanish-speaking patientsDigital health technologiesBreast cancerProspective cohort studyClinician-reported outcomesCancer clinical trialsClinical decision-makingStudy questionnairePatient-centred evaluationHealth technologiesMeasure symptomsOncology practiceCohort studyRecord dataPatient's impressionMayo ClinicEnglish-speakingWearable sensors
2004
Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Race-, Sex-, and Age-Based Disparities
Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Race-, Sex-, and Age-Based Disparities. JAMA 2004, 291: 2720-2726. PMID: 15187053, DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCancer trialsCancer clinical trialsClinical trialsTrial participantsEnrollment fractionWhite patientsAge groupsCross-sectional population-based analysisProstate cancer clinical trialsCancer research participationCancer trial participantsColorectal cancer trialsPatients 75 yearsIncident cancer patientsLung cancer trialsPopulation-based analysisRelative risk ratiosAge-based disparitiesYears of ageNational Cancer InstituteLogistic regression modelsLittle recent informationTrial enrolleesYounger patientsPatient group