2020
Survivin expression and impact on head and neck cancer outcomes
Khan SA, Burke M, Zhu F, Yang DH, Dubyk C, Mehra R, Lango MJ, Ridge JA, Sher DJ, Burtness B. Survivin expression and impact on head and neck cancer outcomes. Oral Oncology 2020, 112: 105049. PMID: 33221541, PMCID: PMC10916757, DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105049.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAge FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overApoptosisCell NucleusCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16CytoplasmDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsPrognosisSex FactorsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurvivinTissue Array AnalysisTreatment OutcomeTumor Suppressor Protein p53ConceptsOverall survivalSurvivin expressionTissue microarraySurvivin levelsNeck squamous cell carcinomaTotal compartmentFox Chase Cancer CenterNeck cancer outcomesShorter overall survivalSquamous cell carcinomaHigh survivin expressionGrade of tumorAnti-cancer therapySystemic therapyPatient sexSurvival outcomesCancer CenterCell carcinomaCancer outcomesP16 statusPredictive biomarkersPrimary tumorSurvivin protein expressionTreatment responseN stageQuality of Life With Pembrolizumab for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KEYNOTE-040
Harrington KJ, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Dinis J, Licitra LF, Ahn MJ, Soria A, Machiels JH, Mach N, Mehra R, Burtness B, Ellison MC, Cheng JD, Chirovsky DR, Swaby RF, Cohen EEW. Quality of Life With Pembrolizumab for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KEYNOTE-040. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2020, 113: 171-181. PMID: 32407532, PMCID: PMC7850527, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa063.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckConceptsGHS/QoL scoresStandard of careNeck squamous cell carcinomaGlobal health statusSquamous cell carcinomaQOL scoresWeek 15KEYNOTE-040Metastatic HNSCCCell carcinomaNeck cancer-specific modulePlatinum-containing regimenHealth-related qualityCancer-specific moduleQuality of lifeHRQoL benefitsHRQoL populationMetastatic headHRQoL analysisMedian timeLife HeadPembrolizumabPatientsHealth statusEuropean Organization
2017
Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced, Resectable Esophagogastric Cancer
Boland PM, Meyer JE, Berger AC, Cohen SJ, Neuman T, Cooper HS, Olszanski AJ, Davey M, Cheng JD, Lebenthal A, Burtness BA, Scott WJ, Astsaturov IA. Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced, Resectable Esophagogastric Cancer. American Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 40: 393-398. PMID: 26986978, PMCID: PMC5026539, DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000171.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGastroesophageal junction carcinomaPreoperative chemoradiationPreoperative chemotherapyAdditional patientsSmall molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitorGrade 4 nonhematologic toxicityReceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitorsPhase ICommon acute toxicitiesLocalized esophageal cancerResectable esophagogastric cancerTolerability of vandetanibMedian overall survivalMicroscopic residual diseasePathologic complete responseLocalized esophageal carcinomaTyrosine kinase inhibitorsEsophagogastric cancerInduction therapyNonhematologic toxicityPrior therapyDaily radiotherapyLate complicationsOverall survivalSurgical candidatesBiomarkers predict enhanced clinical outcomes with afatinib versus methotrexate in patients with second-line recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer
Cohen EEW, Licitra LF, Burtness B, Fayette J, Gauler T, Clement PM, Grau JJ, del Campo JM, Mailliez A, Haddad RI, Vermorken JB, Tahara M, Guigay J, Geoffrois L, Merlano MC, Dupuis N, Krämer N, Cong XJ, Gibson N, Solca F, Ehrnrooth E, Machiels J. Biomarkers predict enhanced clinical outcomes with afatinib versus methotrexate in patients with second-line recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. Annals Of Oncology 2017, 28: 2526-2532. PMID: 28961833, PMCID: PMC5834024, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx344.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAfatinibAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMethotrexateNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPredictive Value of TestsQuinazolinesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckConceptsProgression-free survivalMetastatic headEfficacy outcomesMedian progression-free survivalRecurrent/metastatic headNeck squamous cell carcinomaTumor biomarkersNeck 1 trialP16-positive diseaseSecond-line afatinibOverall study populationSubset of patientsP16-negative tumorsSquamous cell carcinomaEnhanced clinical outcomesBiomarker analysisM HNSCCTherapy-naïveBaseline characteristicsStudy entryClinical outcomesHNSCC patientsPlatinum therapyCell carcinomaNeck cancerEnt Instructions for Authors
Wang LS, Handorf EA, Ridge JA, Burtness BA, Lango MN, Mehra R, Liu JC, Galloway TJ. Ent Instructions for Authors. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal 2017, 96: 271-272. PMID: 28719713, PMCID: PMC7549076, DOI: 10.1177/014556131709600703.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChi-Square DistributionCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsConceptsNonmelanoma skin cancerProgression-free survivalConcurrent chemoradiationLymph nodesLocoregional controlOverall survivalSkin cancerLocalized skin cancerLymph node measurementLymph node positiveGrade 4 thrombocytopeniaPositive lymph nodesSingle tertiary centerKaplan-Meier methodAggressive clinical courseAdjuvant concurrent chemoradiationAdvanced nonmelanoma skin cancersChi-square testAdjuvant radiationAdjuvant therapyClinical courseLocal recurrenceNode positiveTertiary centerCRT patients
2016
E1308: Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Reduced-Dose Radiation and Weekly Cetuximab in Patients With HPV-Associated Resectable Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx— ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Marur S, Li S, Cmelak AJ, Gillison ML, Zhao WJ, Ferris RL, Westra WH, Gilbert J, Bauman JE, Wagner LI, Trevarthen DR, Balkrishna J, Murphy BA, Agrawal N, Colevas AD, Chung CH, Burtness B. E1308: Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Reduced-Dose Radiation and Weekly Cetuximab in Patients With HPV-Associated Resectable Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx— ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 35: 490-497. PMID: 28029303, PMCID: PMC5455313, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.68.3300.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleExanthemaFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeutropeniaOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsRadiotherapy DosageRemission InductionConceptsOropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomaComplete clinical responseCycle of ICPhase II trialProgression-free survivalSquamous cell carcinomaWeekly cetuximabII trialCell carcinomaPack-year smoking historyResectable squamous cell carcinomaFavorable-risk patientsPrimary end pointOverall survival rateHigh cure ratesCancer Research GroupGy of radiationRadiation doseLong-term toxicityRadiation dose reductionChemoradiation resultsICS respondersInduction chemotherapyLate sequelaeClinical responseCALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers
Enzinger PC, Burtness BA, Niedzwiecki D, Ye X, Douglas K, Ilson DH, Villaflor VM, Cohen SJ, Mayer RJ, Venook A, Benson AB, Goldberg RM. CALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 2736-2742. PMID: 27382098, PMCID: PMC5019745, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.5092.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabCisplatinDisease ProgressionDisease-Free SurvivalEpirubicinEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment FailureConceptsGastroesophageal junction cancerProgression-free survivalMetastatic esophagealJunction cancerOverall survivalTreatment failureResponse rateMedian progression-free survivalRandomized phase II studyContinuous infusion fluorouracilOptimal chemotherapy backboneTreatment-related deathsMedian overall survivalPhase II studyPrimary end pointCooperative group studiesPromising preclinical dataChemotherapy backboneChemotherapy regimensAdverse eventsII studySecondary outcomesMedian timeTreatment armsPreclinical dataRandomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan/Docetaxel or Irinotecan/Docetaxel Plus Cetuximab for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Burtness B, Powell M, Catalano P, Berlin J, Liles DK, Chapman AE, Mitchell E, Benson AB. Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan/Docetaxel or Irinotecan/Docetaxel Plus Cetuximab for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. American Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 39: 340-345. PMID: 24685886, PMCID: PMC4177955, DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000068.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAgedAnticoagulantsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCA-19-9 AntigenCamptothecinCetuximabDiarrheaDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelEnoxaparinFemaleHumansIrinotecanMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsSurvival RateTaxoidsThromboembolismConceptsProgression-free survivalMetastatic pancreatic cancerAddition of cetuximabGrade 3/4 toxicitiesOverall survivalArm APancreatic cancerResponse rateArm B.Arm B. Median progression-free survivalMedian progression-free survivalPrincipal grade 3/4 toxicitiesRandomized phase II trialIrinotecan/docetaxelPhase II trialEligible patientsII trialPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsThromboembolic eventsDocetaxel combinationIrinotecan combinationObjective responseIrinotecan therapyMetastatic adenocarcinoma
2014
Afatinib versus placebo as adjuvant therapy after chemoradiation in a double-blind, phase III study (LUX-Head & Neck 2) in patients with primary unresected, clinically intermediate-to-high-risk head and neck cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Burtness B, Bourhis JP, Vermorken JB, Harrington KJ, Cohen E. Afatinib versus placebo as adjuvant therapy after chemoradiation in a double-blind, phase III study (LUX-Head & Neck 2) in patients with primary unresected, clinically intermediate-to-high-risk head and neck cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014, 15: 469. PMID: 25432788, PMCID: PMC4289298, DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-469.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAfatinibAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodErbB ReceptorsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuality of LifeQuinazolinesResearch DesignRisk FactorsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsEpidermal growth factor receptorDisease-free survivalErbB family membersAdvanced diseaseOropharynx cancerOverall survivalEndpoint measuresUnfavourable riskPrimary siteHigh-risk HNSCC patientsHPV-positive oropharynx cancerIrreversible ErbB family blockerDisease-free survival ratesRandomized phase II trialNeck squamous cell carcinomaErbB family blockerHigh-risk headHigh-risk HNSCCPrimary endpoint measureGood clinical conditionEvidence of diseaseLymph node involvementPhase II trialPhase III studyUnacceptable adverse eventsA 3′-UTR KRAS-variant is associated with cisplatin resistance in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Chung CH, Lee JW, Slebos RJ, Howard JD, Perez J, Kang H, Fertig EJ, Considine M, Gilbert J, Murphy BA, Nallur S, Paranjape T, Jordan RC, Garcia J, Burtness B, Forastiere AA, Weidhaas JB. A 3′-UTR KRAS-variant is associated with cisplatin resistance in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Annals Of Oncology 2014, 25: 2230-2236. PMID: 25081901, PMCID: PMC4207729, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu367.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH Keywords3' Untranslated RegionsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Disease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenotypeHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Ras ProteinsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckConceptsNeck squamous cell carcinomaSquamous cell carcinomaKRAS-variantMetastatic headCell carcinomaPatient outcomesP16 expressionRecurrent/metastatic headPoor progression-free survivalCell linesM HNSCC patientsPlatinum-based regimenProgression-free survivalPotential predictive biomarkersHNSCC tumor samplesHNSCC cell linesTG/GGDrug resistance/sensitivityHNSCC patientsOropharynx tumorsClinical findingsRetrospective studyPredictive biomarkersClinical trialsPlatinum responseInduction cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation with cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin for stage III/IV head and neck squamous cancer: a phase II ECOG-ACRIN trial (E2303)
Wanebo HJ, Lee J, Burtness BA, Ridge JA, Ghebremichael M, Spencer SA, Psyrri D, Pectasides E, Rimm D, Rosen FR, Hancock MR, Tolba KA, Forastiere AA. Induction cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation with cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin for stage III/IV head and neck squamous cancer: a phase II ECOG-ACRIN trial (E2303). Annals Of Oncology 2014, 25: 2036-2041. PMID: 25009013, PMCID: PMC4176450, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu248.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEvent-free survivalStage III/IV headResponse/survivalInduction therapyComplete responseStage III/IV HNSCCNeck squamous cell carcinomaPrimary site biopsiesTreatment-related deathsPathologic complete responseNeck squamous cancerSquamous cell carcinomaProtein expression statusEligible patientsSite biopsiesOverall survivalCell carcinomaPromising survivalSquamous cancerDisease progressionChemoradiationRadiation therapyPatientsWeek 9CetuximabPrognostic Biomarkers in Phase II Trial of Cetuximab-Containing Induction and Chemoradiation in Resectable HNSCC: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E2303
Psyrri A, Lee JW, Pectasides E, Vassilakopoulou M, Kosmidis EK, Burtness BA, Rimm DL, Wanebo HJ, Forastiere AA. Prognostic Biomarkers in Phase II Trial of Cetuximab-Containing Induction and Chemoradiation in Resectable HNSCC: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E2303. Clinical Cancer Research 2014, 20: 3023-3032. PMID: 24700741, PMCID: PMC4049169, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0113.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansInduction ChemotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesPaclitaxelPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRas ProteinsSignal TransductionSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTissue Array AnalysisConceptsProgression-free survivalEvent-free survivalPhase II trialOverall survivalII trialTissue microarrayStage III/IV headMultivariable Cox proportional hazards modelsMultivariable Cox regression analysisNeck squamous cell cancerRAS/MAPK/ERKCox proportional hazards modelInsulin-like growth factor 1 receptorLarge prospective studiesCox regression analysisInferior overall survivalKaplan-Meier methodSquamous cell cancerLog-rank testGrowth factor 1 receptorProportional hazards modelPI3K/Akt pathwayFactor 1 receptorPI3K/AktEGF receptor
2012
A Phase II Study of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Cetuximab with or Without Bevacizumab as Frontline Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Fox Chase Extramural Research Study
Dotan E, Meropol NJ, Burtness B, Denlinger CS, Lee J, Mintzer D, Zhu F, Ruth K, Tuttle H, Sylvester J, Cohen SJ. A Phase II Study of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Cetuximab with or Without Bevacizumab as Frontline Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Fox Chase Extramural Research Study. Journal Of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2012, 43: 562-569. PMID: 22294255, PMCID: PMC3400721, DOI: 10.1007/s12029-012-9368-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVascular endothelial growth factorMetastatic colorectal cancerPhase II studyEpidermal growth factor receptorDay 1Arm B.II studyOverall survivalArm AColorectal cancerResponse rateMetastatic colorectal cancer patientsDual antibody therapySafety of capecitabineResultsTwenty-three patientsFirst-line treatmentColorectal cancer patientsOverall response rateKRAS mutation statusEndothelial growth factorBevacizumab 7.5Capecitabine 850Cetuximab 400Growth factor receptorOxaliplatin 130
2010
Nonsurgical management of oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer: The Fox Chase Cancer Center experience
Andrews G, Lango M, Cohen R, Feigenberg S, Burtness B, Mehra R, Ahmed S, Nicolaou N, Gaughan J, Ridge JA. Nonsurgical management of oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer: The Fox Chase Cancer Center experience. Head & Neck 2010, 33: 1433-1440. PMID: 21928415, DOI: 10.1002/hed.21615.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCancer Care FacilitiesCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansHypopharyngeal NeoplasmsLaryngeal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOropharyngeal NeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapySmokingConceptsSurvival of patientsNumber of patientsOropharyngeal cancerHypopharyngeal cancerT classificationLaryngeal cancerFox Chase Cancer Center experienceRetrospective single-institution cohort studyMultivariate analysisSingle-institution cohort studyRecurrent oropharyngeal cancerCancer Center experienceRecurrence-free survivalSubset of patientsLaryngeal cancer patientsDisease-related deathEarly T classificationHypopharyngeal cancer treatmentChemotherapy useCurative intentLocoregional controlCohort studyCurrent smokersOverall survivalSalvage surgeryUse of a Conventional Low Neck Field (LNF) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT): No Clinical Detriment of IMRT to an Anterior LNF During the Treatment of Head-and Neck-Cancer
Turaka A, Li T, Nicolaou N, Lango MN, Burtness B, Horwitz EM, Ridge JA, Feigenberg SJ. Use of a Conventional Low Neck Field (LNF) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT): No Clinical Detriment of IMRT to an Anterior LNF During the Treatment of Head-and Neck-Cancer. International Journal Of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 2010, 79: 65-70. PMID: 20385457, PMCID: PMC3339153, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.034.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChi-Square DistributionCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrostomyHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLinear ModelsLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureConceptsIntensity-modulated radiotherapyLow-neck fieldLower neckDisease-free survival ratesPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubeNeck fieldSingle-institution studySquamous cell carcinomaLog-rank testTreatment of headAnterior photon fieldAnterior low-neck fieldClinical detrimentCurative intentMedian ageClinical outcomesGastrostomy tubeNeck diseasePEG tubeCell carcinomaNeck cancerPhysician preferenceRegional failureStage IIIPatients
2008
A randomized phase II study of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) given daily × 5 days every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study
Burtness BA, Manola J, Axelrod R, Argiris A, Forastiere AA. A randomized phase II study of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) given daily × 5 days every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Annals Of Oncology 2008, 19: 977-983. PMID: 18296423, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm591.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpothilonesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesRecurrenceSalvage TherapySurvival AnalysisTaxoidsConceptsTaxane-naive patientsArm BEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusEastern Cooperative Oncology Group StudyRecurrent squamous cell cancerSensory/motor neuropathyRandomized phase II studyMetastatic/recurrent diseaseCommon grade 3Grade 3 neuropathyPhase II studyPrimary end pointSquamous cell cancerSquamous cell carcinomaEligible patientsPrior regimensWeekly ixabepiloneRecurrent diseaseII studyMedian survivalPartial responsePerformance statusMotor neuropathyCell cancerCell carcinoma
2007
Phase II Trial of Weekly Docetaxel/Irinotecan Combination in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Burtness B, Thomas L, Sipples R, McGurk M, Salikooti S, Christoforou M, Mirto G, Salem R, Sosa J, Kloss R, Rahman Z, Chung G, Lacy J, Murren JR. Phase II Trial of Weekly Docetaxel/Irinotecan Combination in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. The Cancer Journal 2007, 13: 257-262. PMID: 17762761, DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0b013e31813c1174.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdvanced pancreatic cancerPancreatic cancerEligible patientsIrinotecan combinationPartial responseComplete responseEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0Principal grade 3/4 toxicitiesWorld Health Organization criteriaSafety of docetaxelGrade 3/4 toxicitiesObjective response ratePerformance status 0One-year survivalPhase II trialCombination of docetaxelNormal bilirubin levelsEvaluable patientsFebrile neutropeniaMeasurable diseaseStatus 0Toxic deathsUnresectable diseaseII trialRecurrent disease
2005
Five-Year Update of an Expanded Phase II Study of Dose-Dense and -Intense Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel and Cyclophosphamide (ATC) in High-Risk Breast Cancer
Abu-Khalaf MM, Windsor S, Ebisu K, Salikooti S, Ananthanarayanan G, Chung GG, DiGiovanna MP, Haffty BG, Abrams M, Farber LR, Hsu AD, Reiss M, Zelterman D, Burtness BA. Five-Year Update of an Expanded Phase II Study of Dose-Dense and -Intense Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel and Cyclophosphamide (ATC) in High-Risk Breast Cancer. Oncology 2005, 69: 372-383. PMID: 16319508, DOI: 10.1159/000089991.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk breast cancerBreast cancerAdjuvant therapyLymph nodesCommon grade 3 toxicitiesIpsilateral axillary lymph nodesGrade 3 toxicityGrade 3/4 neutropeniaPhase II studyAxillary lymph nodesPalmar-plantar erythrodysesthesiaDose-denseEligible patientsFeasible regimenFilgrastim supportNeutropenic feverDistant diseaseAxillary nodesDose intensityII studyBC surgerySequential doxorubicinAcute leukemiaMetastatic cancerMedian number
2003
Epidermal growth factor receptor, p53 mutation, and pathological response predict survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Gibson MK, Abraham SC, Wu TT, Burtness B, Heitmiller RF, Heath E, Forastiere A. Epidermal growth factor receptor, p53 mutation, and pathological response predict survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Clinical Cancer Research 2003, 9: 6461-8. PMID: 14695149.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAgedBcl-2-Associated X ProteinCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilGenes, p53HumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMutationProportional Hazards ModelsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Regression AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsAdvanced esophageal cancerOverall survivalComplete responseEsophageal cancerEpidermal growth factor receptorP53 mutationsGrowth factor receptorClinical covariatesCellular markersBetter tumor differentiationPathological complete responseFactor receptorEGF-R expressionBcl-2 expressionInfusional cisplatinDaily radiotherapyMost patientsPoor OSPreoperative chemoradiotherapyPatient agePretreatment tumorOutcome predictorsPredictive factorsBarrett's metaplasiaTumor location