2011
Prognostic Value of the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) Trial
Palmerini T, Genereux P, Caixeta A, Cristea E, Lansky A, Mehran R, Dangas G, Lazar D, Sanchez R, Fahy M, Xu K, Stone GW. Prognostic Value of the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) Trial. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2011, 57: 2389-2397. PMID: 21658558, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery BypassElectrocardiographyEmergency TreatmentFemaleHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHirudinsHospital MortalityHumansItalyKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPeptide FragmentsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRecombinant ProteinsRisk AssessmentROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeTriageConceptsSegment elevation acute coronary syndromesElevation acute coronary syndromePercutaneous coronary interventionAcute coronary syndromeSYNTAX scoreCoronary syndromeCardiac deathACUITY trialIndependent predictorsPredictive valueTarget vessel revascularization rateStable ischemic heart diseaseTriple-vessel coronary diseaseVessel revascularization rateCardiac mortality rateMyocardial infarction ratePre-specified subgroupsRisk-stratify patientsIschemic heart diseaseAngiographic substudySS tertilesInfarction rateRevascularization ratesCoronary interventionCoronary disease
2010
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients Undergoing Multilesion and Multivessel Intervention The SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) Randomized Trials
Kereiakes DJ, Sudhir K, Hermiller JB, Gordon PC, Ferguson J, Yaqub M, Sood P, Su X, Yakubov S, Lansky AJ, Stone GW. Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients Undergoing Multilesion and Multivessel Intervention The SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2010, 3: 1229-1239. PMID: 21232716, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSirolimusTime FactorsUnited StatesConceptsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsIschemia-driven target lesion revascularizationTarget vessel myocardial infarctionSPIRIT IV trialTarget lesion revascularizationVessel myocardial infarctionLesion revascularizationMultivessel diseaseMultivessel interventionAbsolute benefitMyocardial infarctionOptimal revascularization strategySingle-vessel interventionDe novo lesionsReference vessel diameterEverolimus-ElutingMultilesion interventionEfficacy outcomesNovo lesionsRevascularization strategyCoronary diseaseClinical outcomesCoronary arteryClinical safetySingle lesion
2008
Clinical and angiographic outcomes in diabetic patients following single or multivessel stenting in the COSTAR II randomized trial.
Kereiakes DJ, Petersen JL, Batchelor WB, Fitzgerald PJ, Mehran R, Lansky A, Tsujino I, Schofer J, Dubois C, Verheye S, Cristea E, Garg J, Wijns W, Krucoff MW. Clinical and angiographic outcomes in diabetic patients following single or multivessel stenting in the COSTAR II randomized trial. Journal Of Invasive Cardiology 2008, 20: 335-41. PMID: 18599890.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAngiographyAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryBlood GlucoseCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug-Eluting StentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodStentsTreatment OutcomeConceptsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionDiabetic patientsAngiographic outcomesAdverse outcomesTaxus stentStent deploymentBare metal stent deploymentAdverse cardiovascular eventsMultivessel coronary diseaseTarget vessel revascularizationImproved clinical outcomesAngiographic restenosisCardiovascular eventsVessel revascularizationCoronary interventionCoronary diseaseGlycemic controlMultivessel stentingClinical outcomesDiabetic cohortElevated HbA1cLate lumenPatientsDiabetes
2004
Comparison of differences in outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in men versus women <40 years of age
Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Dangas G, Cristea E, Shirai K, Costa R, Costantini C, Tsuchiya Y, Carlier S, Mintz G, Cottin Y, Stone G, Moses J, Leon MB. Comparison of differences in outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in men versus women <40 years of age. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2004, 93: 916-919. PMID: 15050498, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.046.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionYears of ageCoronary interventionVascular complicationsMyocardial infarctionMortality rateAggressive risk factor modificationQ-wave myocardial infarctionHospital vascular complicationsMore diabetes mellitusPredominance of diabetesNonfatal myocardial infarctionRisk factor modificationPremature coronary diseaseRisk factor profileOnly independent predictorMultivariable regression analysisLess hyperlipidemiaIschemic complicationsConsecutive patientsCoronary diseaseDiabetes mellitusIndependent predictorsPremature atherosclerosisFactor modification
2002
Comparison of clinical outcomes using stents versus no stents after percutaneous coronary intervention for proximal left anterior descending versus proximal right and left circumflex coronary arteries
Ashby DT, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Narasimaiah R, Iakovou I, Polena S, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB. Comparison of clinical outcomes using stents versus no stents after percutaneous coronary intervention for proximal left anterior descending versus proximal right and left circumflex coronary arteries. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2002, 89: 1162-1166. PMID: 12008168, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02297-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedArteriesBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCohort StudiesCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisCoronary VesselsDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRadiographyStentsStroke VolumeSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionTarget lesion revascularizationProximal LAD arteryProximal rightClinical restenosisCoronary interventionCircumflex arteryProcedural successLAD arteryProximal coronary artery stenosisSingle-vessel coronary diseaseAnterior descending (LAD) stenosisHigh rateCircumflex coronary arteryLower procedural successCoronary artery stenosisSignificant differencesDifferent lesion locationsCoronary artery stentsLesion revascularizationProximal LADCoronary diseaseArtery stenosisClinical outcomesHospital events
2001
Effect of gender on the outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention
Peterson E, Lansky A, Kramer J, Anstrom K, Lanzilotta M, Investigators F. Effect of gender on the outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2001, 88: 359-364. PMID: 11545754, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01679-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIndependent risk factorRisk factorsBaseline clinical risk factorsHigher vascular complication ratesContemporary percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technologyRisk adjustmentExtensive coronary diseaseProcedural mortality rateVascular complication ratesClinical risk factorsPercutaneous coronary interventionBody surface areaPatient body sizeHospital revascularizationAssociation of genderComorbid illnessesVascular complicationsComplication rateCoronary interventionCoronary diseaseProcedural outcomesFemale genderIndependent riskPCI cases