Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients Undergoing Multilesion and Multivessel Intervention The SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) Randomized Trials
Kereiakes DJ, Sudhir K, Hermiller JB, Gordon PC, Ferguson J, Yaqub M, Sood P, Su X, Yakubov S, Lansky AJ, Stone GW. Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients Undergoing Multilesion and Multivessel Intervention The SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2010, 3: 1229-1239. PMID: 21232716, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSirolimusTime FactorsUnited StatesConceptsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsIschemia-driven target lesion revascularizationTarget vessel myocardial infarctionSPIRIT IV trialTarget lesion revascularizationVessel myocardial infarctionLesion revascularizationMultivessel diseaseMultivessel interventionAbsolute benefitMyocardial infarctionOptimal revascularization strategySingle-vessel interventionDe novo lesionsReference vessel diameterEverolimus-ElutingMultilesion interventionEfficacy outcomesNovo lesionsRevascularization strategyCoronary diseaseClinical outcomesCoronary arteryClinical safetySingle lesionWhen Is Door-to-Balloon Time Critical? Analysis From the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) Trials
Brodie BR, Gersh BJ, Stuckey T, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Dudek D, Grines CL, Cox D, Parise H, Prasad A, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. When Is Door-to-Balloon Time Critical? Analysis From the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) Trials. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2010, 56: 407-413. PMID: 20650362, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionLower mortality rateHigh-risk patientsPercutaneous coronary interventionMortality rateEarly presentationCoronary interventionClinical riskST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionSimilar relative risk reductionsHORIZONS-AMI trialElevation myocardial infarctionRelative risk reductionNon-percutaneous coronary intervention hospitalsMortality rate reductionImpact of doorCADILLAC trialHORIZONS-AMIAntithrombotic therapyReperfusion therapyBalloon timeIntervention hospitalsAbsolute benefitLate presentationMyocardial infarction