Misoprostol for labour induction
Kumar N, Haas D, Weeks A. Misoprostol for labour induction. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2021, 77: 53-63. PMID: 34607746, DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVaginal birthVaginal misoprostolOral misoprostolCaesarean sectionRate of caesarean sectionCaesarean section rateFoetal heart rate changesPerinatal adverse eventsUterine hyperstimulationBalloon catheterLabor inductionSection rateEffective induction methodMisoprostolNeonatal complicationsHeart rate changesNo significant differenceRandomised comparisonAdverse eventsSide effectsBirthSignificant differenceHyperstimulationCatheterDinoprostoneLow‐dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour
Kerr R, Kumar N, Williams M, Cuthbert A, Aflaifel N, Haas D, Weeks A. Low‐dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews 2021, 2021: cd014484. PMID: 34155622, PMCID: PMC8218159, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014484.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdministration, IntravaginalAdministration, OralApgar ScoreCesarean SectionDinoprostoneDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHeart Rate, FetalHumansIntensive Care, NeonatalLabor, InducedMisoprostolOxytocicsOxytocinParturitionPlacebosPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsUterusConceptsLow-dose oral misoprostolFoetal heart rate changesTranscervical Foley catheterVaginal birthRates of hyperstimulationOral misoprostolLow-dose misoprostolVaginal dinoprostoneCaesarean sectionHeart rate changesUterine hyperstimulationLabor inductionVaginal misoprostolRate of vaginal birthFoetal distressRisk of uterine hyperstimulationRate of caesarean sectionRisk of caesarean sectionThird trimesterLabour induction methodsFoley catheterChildbirth's Trials RegisterSubgroup analysisWHO International Clinical Trials Registry PlatformAssociated with similar rates
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply