Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging
Tenekecioglu E, Serruys P, Onuma Y, Costa R, Chamié D, Sotomi Y, Yu T, Abizaid A, Liew H, Santoso T. Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2017, 10: 1115-1130. PMID: 28527768, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbsorbable ImplantsCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary AngiographyCoronary RestenosisCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansIndonesiaMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsSingle-Blind MethodSirolimusTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeConceptsAbsorbing devicesMicrofiber scaffoldsVascular scaffoldsGeneration of bioresorbable scaffoldsBioresorbable vascular scaffoldNovel mechanical propertiesSquare strutsAbsorb bioresorbable vascular scaffoldMechanical propertiesIn-deviceBioresorbable scaffoldsOptical coherence tomographyMinimal luminal diameterDiameter stenosisDevicesScaffoldsAbsorberCoherence tomographyFollow-upLate lossStudy groupDiameterLuminal diameterMedium-term safetyOptimal implant
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply