2020
Neuroimaging Association Scores: reliability and validity of aggregate measures of brain structural features linked to mental disorders in youth
Axelrud L, Simioni A, Pine D, Winkler A, Pan P, Sato J, Zugman A, Parker N, Picon F, Jackowski A, Hoexter M, Barker G, Martinot J, Martinot M, Satterthwaite T, Rohde L, Milham M, Barker E, Salum G. Neuroimaging Association Scores: reliability and validity of aggregate measures of brain structural features linked to mental disorders in youth. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2020, 30: 1895-1906. PMID: 33030612, PMCID: PMC9077631, DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01653-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGeneral psychopathologyCortical thicknessBrain featuresSubcortical volumesMental disordersStructural brain featuresInternal consistencyBrain structural featuresHealthy Brain NetworkPsychiatric disordersAssociation scoreSymptomatic domainsHigh internal consistencyPsychopathology assessmentDisordersBrain networksLow internal consistencyEffect sizeBehavioral phenotypesScoresReplicable associationsPsychopathologyWeighted scoreAssociationReplicable markers
2019
Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the Suicide Stroop Task
Wilson K, Millner A, Auerbach R, Glenn C, Kearns J, Kirtley O, Najmi S, O’Connor R, Stewart J, B. C. Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the Suicide Stroop Task. Psychological Assessment 2019, 31: 1052-1061. PMID: 31070448, PMCID: PMC7011179, DOI: 10.1037/pas0000723.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSuicide stroop taskStroop taskBehavioral measuresPsychometric propertiesConcurrent validityInternal consistencyMental health researchLow internal consistencyInternal consistency coefficientSuicide attemptsSuicidal thoughtsStimulus typeNear chanceSuicideReliability findingsScoring approachInterference scoresConsistency coefficientTaskScoresNonattemptersPsychometricallyRTHealth researchFindings
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply