2025
Governance Considerations for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: a HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community Whitepaper in Collaboration with AIUM
Ma I, Francavilla M, Nomura J, Kielski A, Fernandez F, Piro K, Liu R, Valenzuela J, Toland M, Koehler J, Cohen G, Eid M, Choi W, Nolan J, Ferre R, McBee M, Kummer T, Lanspa M, Brown J, DeStigter K, Desyatnikova S, Bottemiller A. Governance Considerations for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: a HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community Whitepaper in Collaboration with AIUM. Journal Of Imaging Informatics In Medicine 2025, 1-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01365-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEnterprise imagePoint-of-care ultrasoundWorkflow solutionTechnology governanceWorkflow needsInformation governancePatient care outcomesPoint-of-careUnique workflowCare outcomesClinical governancePoint-of-care ultrasound imagingHealthcare settingsHealthcare systemOperational efficiencyImagesImplementationInformationHealthcareEducational requirementsGovernance committeeClinical informationInstitutional policiesWorkflowGovernance Considerations for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: a HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community Whitepaper in Collaboration with AIUM.
Ma I, Francavilla M, Nomura J, Kielski A, Fernandez F, Piro K, Liu R, Valenzuela J, Toland M, Koehler J, Cohen G, Eid M, Choi W, Nolan J, Ferre R, McBee M, Kummer T, Lanspa M, Brown J, DeStigter K, Desyatnikova S, Bottemiller A. Governance Considerations for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: a HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community Whitepaper in Collaboration with AIUM. Journal Of Imaging Informatics In Medicine 2025 PMID: 39753828, DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01365-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEnterprise imagePoint-of-care ultrasoundWorkflow solutionTechnology governanceWorkflow needsInformation governancePatient care outcomesPoint-of-careUnique workflowCare outcomesClinical governancePoint-of-care ultrasound imagingHealthcare settingsHealthcare systemOperational efficiencyImagesImplementationInformationHealthcareEducational requirementsGovernance committeeClinical informationInstitutional policiesWorkflow
2021
Recognizing Cross-Institutional Fiscal and Administrative Barriers and Facilitators to Conducting Community-Engaged Clinical and Translational Research
Carter-Edwards L, Grewe ME, Fair AM, Jenkins C, Ray NJ, Bilheimer A, Dave G, Nunez-Smith M, Richmond A, Wilkins CH. Recognizing Cross-Institutional Fiscal and Administrative Barriers and Facilitators to Conducting Community-Engaged Clinical and Translational Research. Academic Medicine 2021, 96: 558-567. PMID: 33332904, PMCID: PMC7996237, DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003893.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCommunity-engaged researchFiscal capacityAdministrative processesInstitutional policiesKey themesCommunity-engaged research partnershipStakeholder groupsAcademic researchersAdministrative barriersCommunity partnersResearch administratorsCTSA institutionsCross-cutting challengeBest practicesRapid Assessment ProcessTranslational Science Award institutionsEquitable processKey informantsResearch partnershipsPartnership collaborationQualitative studyCollective awarenessTranscribed interviewsManagement culturePurposive samplePerspectives on the Effectiveness of a Medical Futility Policy.
Kaps B, Chen HA, Kopf GS, Encandela J. Perspectives on the Effectiveness of a Medical Futility Policy. The Journal Of Clinical Ethics 2021, 32: 48-60. PMID: 33656456, DOI: 10.1086/jce2021321048.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFocus groupsHospital ethics committeeFutile interventionsSimilar policiesInstitutional policiesOverarching findingPolicyFamily membersFutility policiesEthics consultationMixed perceptionsYale-New Haven HospitalEthics CommitteeMain themesLevel of interpretationCritical care physiciansPractice policiesNew Haven HospitalCommon themesCertain groupsInstitutionsThemesCare physiciansHospital policiesAppropriate interventionsThe Current State of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in the Radiology Workplace: A Survey
Pitot MA, White MA, Edney E, Mogensen MA, Solberg A, Kattapuram T, Kadom N. The Current State of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in the Radiology Workplace: A Survey. Academic Radiology 2021, 29: 416-425. PMID: 33495074, DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.01.002.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
Creating, reinforcing, and resisting the gender binary: a qualitative study of transgender women’s healthcare experiences in sex-segregated jails and prisons
Hughto J, Clark KA, Altice FL, Reisner SL, Kershaw TS, Pachankis JE. Creating, reinforcing, and resisting the gender binary: a qualitative study of transgender women’s healthcare experiences in sex-segregated jails and prisons. International Journal Of Prison Health 2018, 14: 69-88. PMID: 29869582, PMCID: PMC5992494, DOI: 10.1108/ijph-02-2017-0011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGender binaryTransgender womenHealthcare experiencesWomen's healthcare experiencesResearch limitations/implications FindingsCorrectional healthcare providersProviders' limited knowledgeDesign/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviewsWomen ActFirst-hand accountsWomen's accessMethodology/approachOriginality/valueInstitutional cultureMulti-level barriersStructural stigmaFeminine identityInstitutional policiesFindings ParticipantsImplications FindingsQualitative studyHealthcare barriersInsufficient accessPrison
2012
Credentialing the clinical ethics consultant: an academic medical center affirms professionalism and practice.
Acres C, Prager K, Hardart G, Fins J. Credentialing the clinical ethics consultant: an academic medical center affirms professionalism and practice. The Journal Of Clinical Ethics 2012, 23: 156-64. PMID: 22822704, DOI: 10.1086/jce201223208.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical ethics case consultationEthics case consultationAcademic medical centerClinical ethics consultationClinical ethicistsEthics consultationCase consultationMedical CenterHistorical contextBioethicsNewYork-PresbyterianIncreased accountabilityNational trendsConceptual rationaleEthicistsInstitutional policiesConsultationCredentialsContextDialogueLocal contextAccounts
2005
On the Nature of Prejudice: The Psychological Foundations of Hate.
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Pearson A. On the Nature of Prejudice: The Psychological Foundations of Hate. 2005, 211-234. DOI: 10.1037/10930-010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRacial biasesRace relationsSocial controlEgalitarian valuesNature of prejudiceRacial attitudesTraditional valuesInstitutional policiesCultural valuesSocial normsMajority groupRacial climateWhite AmericansStatus quoContemporary roleOpen expressionSuperior statusUnited StatesHateWhitesPsychological foundationsConventional beliefIdeologyPersonal goalsPolicy
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply