2024
Robotic Arm–Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Smaller Femoral Components and Larger Tibial Baseplates Than the Manual Technique
Bernstein J, Hepinstall M, Donnelley C, Rajahraman V, Waren D, Schwarzkopf R, Wiznia D. Robotic Arm–Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Smaller Femoral Components and Larger Tibial Baseplates Than the Manual Technique. Arthroplasty Today 2024, 29: 101414. PMID: 39529977, PMCID: PMC11551327, DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101414.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTotal knee arthroplastyMultivariate analysisImplant sizeTotal knee arthroplasty resultsThree-dimensional planningAcademic medical centerImplant size selectionManual cohortEffect modificationInstrumented total knee arthroplastyClinical outcomesImplant selectionMedical CenterCohortProsthetic designRobotic systemArthroplasty resultsKnee arthroplastyFemoral componentManual techniquesTibial component
2018
A Predictive Model for Determining Permanent Implant Size During 2-Stage Implant Breast Reconstruction
Gabrick KS, Markov NP, Chouairi F, Wu R, Persing SM, Abraham P, Avraham T, Alperovich M. A Predictive Model for Determining Permanent Implant Size During 2-Stage Implant Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 2018, 6: e1790. PMID: 29922567, PMCID: PMC5999420, DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001790.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImplant breast reconstructionBreast reconstructionPreoperative radiationPreoperative variablesPI sizeSignificant preoperative variablesFill volumeRange of implantsTissue expanderSilicone implantsMultivariate analysisImplant sizeStudy periodSurgical planningSignificant variablesRoom workflowPatientsRegression analysisTE volumeTE sizeImplants
2016
“Breast in a Day”
Choi M, Frey JD, Alperovich M, Levine JP, Karp NS. “Breast in a Day”. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2016, 138: 184e-191e. PMID: 27465178, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002333.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPermanent implant reconstructionNipple-sparing mastectomyMastectomy flap necrosisImplant reconstructionAcellular dermal matrixComplication rateFlap necrosisMajor mastectomy flap necrosisMinor mastectomy flap necrosisDermal matrixImplant sizeCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVELPercent of reconstructionsCommon major complicationPrior radiation therapyGreater complication rateLow complication rateNipple-sparing mastectomiesBody mass indexCommon minor complicationAverage implant sizeMajority of implantsOverall complicationsNipple necrosisMinor complications
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply