2024
IOC consensus statement: interpersonal violence and safeguarding in sport
Tuakli-Wosornu Y, Burrows K, Fasting K, Hartill M, Hodge K, Kaufman K, Kavanagh E, Kirby S, MacLeod J, Mountjoy M, Parent S, Tak M, Vertommen T, Rhind D. IOC consensus statement: interpersonal violence and safeguarding in sport. British Journal Of Sports Medicine 2024, 58: 1322-1344. PMID: 39586634, DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108766.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInterpersonal violenceSport ecosystemVoting statementsSport settingsJoanna Briggs Institute methodologyOlympic athletesContextual determinantsVotingMutual careRelevant grey literatureViolenceHealthy relationshipsConceptual modelSportsPREVENT IVConsensus guidelinesWriting groupCare principlesSynthesise evidenceInstitute methodologyScoping ReviewConsensus recommendationsDiverse perspectivesEffective safeguardsEvidence review
2023
Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine
Tobias D, Merino J, Ahmad A, Aiken C, Benham J, Bodhini D, Clark A, Colclough K, Corcoy R, Cromer S, Duan D, Felton J, Francis E, Gillard P, Gingras V, Gaillard R, Haider E, Hughes A, Ikle J, Jacobsen L, Kahkoska A, Kettunen J, Kreienkamp R, Lim L, Männistö J, Massey R, Mclennan N, Miller R, Morieri M, Most J, Naylor R, Ozkan B, Patel K, Pilla S, Prystupa K, Raghavan S, Rooney M, Schön M, Semnani-Azad Z, Sevilla-Gonzalez M, Svalastoga P, Takele W, Tam C, Thuesen A, Tosur M, Wallace A, Wang C, Wong J, Yamamoto J, Young K, Amouyal C, Andersen M, Bonham M, Chen M, Cheng F, Chikowore T, Chivers S, Clemmensen C, Dabelea D, Dawed A, Deutsch A, Dickens L, DiMeglio L, Dudenhöffer-Pfeifer M, Evans-Molina C, Fernández-Balsells M, Fitipaldi H, Fitzpatrick S, Gitelman S, Goodarzi M, Grieger J, Guasch-Ferré M, Habibi N, Hansen T, Huang C, Harris-Kawano A, Ismail H, Hoag B, Johnson R, Jones A, Koivula R, Leong A, Leung G, Libman I, Liu K, Long S, Lowe W, Morton R, Motala A, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Pankow J, Pathirana M, Pazmino S, Perez D, Petrie J, Powe C, Quinteros A, Jain R, Ray D, Ried-Larsen M, Saeed Z, Santhakumar V, Kanbour S, Sarkar S, Monaco G, Scholtens D, Selvin E, Sheu W, Speake C, Stanislawski M, Steenackers N, Steck A, Stefan N, Støy J, Taylor R, Tye S, Ukke G, Urazbayeva M, Van der Schueren B, Vatier C, Wentworth J, Hannah W, White S, Yu G, Zhang Y, Zhou S, Beltrand J, Polak M, Aukrust I, de Franco E, Flanagan S, Maloney K, McGovern A, Molnes J, Nakabuye M, Njølstad P, Pomares-Millan H, Provenzano M, Saint-Martin C, Zhang C, Zhu Y, Auh S, de Souza R, Fawcett A, Gruber C, Mekonnen E, Mixter E, Sherifali D, Eckel R, Nolan J, Philipson L, Brown R, Billings L, Boyle K, Costacou T, Dennis J, Florez J, Gloyn A, Gomez M, Gottlieb P, Greeley S, Griffin K, Hattersley A, Hirsch I, Hivert M, Hood K, Josefson J, Kwak S, Laffel L, Lim S, Loos R, Ma R, Mathieu C, Mathioudakis N, Meigs J, Misra S, Mohan V, Murphy R, Oram R, Owen K, Ozanne S, Pearson E, Perng W, Pollin T, Pop-Busui R, Pratley R, Redman L, Redondo M, Reynolds R, Semple R, Sherr J, Sims E, Sweeting A, Tuomi T, Udler M, Vesco K, Vilsbøll T, Wagner R, Rich S, Franks P. Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine. Nature Medicine 2023, 29: 2438-2457. PMID: 37794253, PMCID: PMC10735053, DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02502-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDiabetes medicinesInternational Consensus ReportPrecision diabetes medicineContemporary evidence-based medicineSystematic evidence reviewEvidence-based medicineHealth equityConsensus reportHealth recommendationsPrecision medicine researchEvidence reviewPrecision medicineClinical readinessLife-threatening complicationsPillars of precision medicineRisk of complicationsMedical decisionsClinically relevant evidenceRelevant evidenceClinical presentationMedicine researchHealthRevealed opportunitiesOptimal outcomesDiabetes
2022
Health Disparities in Uterine Cancer
Whetstone S, Burke W, Sheth SS, Brooks R, Cavens A, Huber-Keener K, Scott DM, Worly B, Chelmow D. Health Disparities in Uterine Cancer. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2022, 139: 645-659. PMID: 35272301, PMCID: PMC8936152, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004710.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHealth care cliniciansUterine cancerWomen's health care cliniciansHealth disparitiesEvidence-based educational materialsCare cliniciansGynecologic cancerEvidence summariesGynecologic oncologyPractice guidelinesEarly diagnosisAmerican CollegeGeneral obstetricsEvidence reviewDisease controlCancerPanel of expertsSubstantive knowledge gapsEducational materialsCliniciansPreventionContent expertsLiterature reviewRelevant literatureReviewExecutive Summary of the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference
Chelmow D, Brooks R, Cavens A, Huber-Keener K, Scott DM, Sheth SS, Whetstone S, Worly B, Burke W. Executive Summary of the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2022, 139: 626-643. PMID: 35272316, PMCID: PMC8936160, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004711.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHealth care cliniciansUterine cancerEarly diagnosisWomen's health care cliniciansEvidence-based educational materialsCare cliniciansGynecologic cancerEvidence summariesGynecologic oncologyPatient advocacy organizationsPractice guidelinesAmerican CollegeGeneral obstetricsPanel membersEvidence reviewDisease controlPanel of expertsSubstantive knowledge gapsCancerCliniciansRelevant literaturePreventionEducational materialsDiagnosisContent experts
2021
Oncology Medical Home: ASCO and COA Standards
Woofter K, Kennedy EB, Adelson K, Bowman R, Brodie R, Dickson N, Gerber R, Fields KK, Murtaugh C, Polite B, Paschall M, Skelton M, Zoet D, Cox JV. Oncology Medical Home: ASCO and COA Standards. JCO Oncology Practice 2021, 17: 475-492. PMID: 34255551, DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00167.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSurvivorship care plansEvidence baseClinical pathwayCare plansExpert panelSystematic reviewLong-term outcome dataGoals of careEvidence-based careLife care discussionsTeam-based careInformal consensus processEvidence-based medicineMeasurement of outcomesPeer-reviewed journalsSurvivorship careChemotherapy safetyCare discussionsInclusion criteriaOutcome dataPatient engagementEvidence reviewExpert consensusPeer-reviewed studiesCare deliveryNucleic Acid–based Testing for Noninfluenza Viral Pathogens in Adults with Suspected Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Evans SE, Jennerich AL, Azar MM, Cao B, Crothers K, Dickson RP, Herold S, Jain S, Madhavan A, Metersky ML, Myers LC, Oren E, Restrepo MI, Semret M, Sheshadri A, Wunderink RG, Dela Cruz CS. Nucleic Acid–based Testing for Noninfluenza Viral Pathogens in Adults with Suspected Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. American Journal Of Respiratory And Critical Care Medicine 2021, 203: 1070-1087. PMID: 33929301, PMCID: PMC8314899, DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202102-0498st.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCommunity-acquired pneumoniaNucleic acid-based testingClinical practice guidelinesRespiratory samplesPractice guidelinesViral pathogensOfficial American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice GuidelineAcute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infectionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infectionEvidence-based clinical practice guidelinesSyndrome coronavirus 2 infectionAntibiotic use patternsCoronavirus 2 infectionGrading of RecommendationsRisk of biasOverall survivalPragmatic systematic reviewClinical recommendationsMultidisciplinary panelDiagnostic utilityEvidence reviewPopulation interventionsSystematic reviewInfluenzaRoutine diagnostics
2020
Technical Evidence Review for Emergency Major Abdominal Operation Conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery
Hu Q, Grant M, Hornor M, Merchant N, Liu J, Fischer C, Peden C, Ko C, Maggard-Gibbons M, Wu C, Wick E. Technical Evidence Review for Emergency Major Abdominal Operation Conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. Journal Of The American College Of Surgeons 2020, 231: 743-764.e5. PMID: 32979468, DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.772.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImplementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019.
Giri VN, Knudsen KE, Kelly WK, Cheng HH, Cooney KA, Cookson MS, Dahut W, Weissman S, Soule HR, Petrylak DP, Dicker AP, AlDubayan SH, Toland AE, Pritchard CC, Pettaway CA, Daly MB, Mohler JL, Parsons JK, Carroll PR, Pilarski R, Blanco A, Woodson A, Rahm A, Taplin ME, Polascik TJ, Helfand BT, Hyatt C, Morgans AK, Feng F, Mullane M, Powers J, Concepcion R, Lin DW, Wender R, Mark JR, Costello A, Burnett AL, Sartor O, Isaacs WB, Xu J, Weitzel J, Andriole GL, Beltran H, Briganti A, Byrne L, Calvaresi A, Chandrasekar T, Chen DYT, Den RB, Dobi A, Crawford ED, Eastham J, Eggener S, Freedman ML, Garnick M, Gomella PT, Handley N, Hurwitz MD, Izes J, Karnes RJ, Lallas C, Languino L, Loeb S, Lopez AM, Loughlin KR, Lu-Yao G, Malkowicz SB, Mann M, Mille P, Miner MM, Morgan T, Moreno J, Mucci L, Myers RE, Nielsen SM, O'Neil B, Pinover W, Pinto P, Poage W, Raj GV, Rebbeck TR, Ryan C, Sandler H, Schiewer M, Scott EMD, Szymaniak B, Tester W, Trabulsi EJ, Vapiwala N, Yu EY, Zeigler-Johnson C, Gomella LG. Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 2798-2811. PMID: 32516092, PMCID: PMC7430215, DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00046.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsGermline testingFamily historyAdditional family historyHereditary cancer assessmentMetastatic disease treatmentAge 40 yearsClinical trial eligibilityPost-test discussionMultidisciplinary consensus conferenceProstate cancer treatmentMismatch repair genesCurrent practice challengesHereditary PCaTrial eligibilityMetastatic diseasePriority genesPathologic criteriaSomatic testingMetastatic PCaProstate cancerPCa diagnosisConsensus conferenceEvidence reviewCancer assessmentInformed consent
2019
Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery
Grant M, Gibbons M, Ko C, Wick E, Cannesson M, Scott M, McEvoy M, King A, Wu C. Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2019, Publish Ahead of Print: &na;. PMID: 30113392, DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003696.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnesthesiaBariatric SurgeryEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Services ResearchHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsBariatric surgeryQuality Safety ProgramSurgical careHealthcare ResearchJohns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong InstituteEvidence reviewAvailable evidenceSafety programHospital staySurgery protocolPostoperative phaseSociety guidelinesAnesthetic interventionsAnesthetic componentsArmstrong InstituteAmerican CollegeSurgeryEnhanced recoverySuperior outcomesLiterature searchPatient safetyFacilitate recoveryCareInterventionOutcomesEvidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery
Soffin E, Gibbons M, Wick E, Kates S, Cannesson M, Scott M, Grant M, Ko S, Wu C. Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2019, Publish Ahead of Print: &na;. PMID: 31094775, DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003925.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnalgesicsAnesthesiologyAnestheticsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipEvidence-Based MedicineHip FracturesHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationNerve BlockPain ManagementPatient SafetyPatient-Centered CarePerioperative CarePerioperative PeriodRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityConceptsQuality Safety ProgramSurgical careEvidence reviewHealthcare ResearchHip fracture repairMultimodal analgesic regimenFull evidence reviewAnesthesia componentsAnalgesic regimenERAS protocolPostoperative nauseaSurgery protocolSurgical patientsMultidisciplinary carePostoperative phaseRegional analgesiaStandardized anestheticAnalgesic agentsPerioperative continuumPreoperative phaseSafety programIntraoperative phaseFracture repairNumerous surgical specialtiesAnesthesiology componentsEvidence review conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: focus on anesthesiology for gynecologic surgery
Grant M, Gibbons M, Ko C, Wick E, Cannesson M, Scott M, Wu C. Evidence review conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: focus on anesthesiology for gynecologic surgery. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019, 44: 437-446. PMID: 30737316, DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100071.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGynecologic surgerySurgical careJohns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong InstituteEvidence reviewEvidence-based process measuresAvailable evidenceAHRQ Safety ProgramSurgical service linesAnesthesia componentsHospital stayPerioperative carePostoperative phaseAnesthetic componentsArmstrong InstituteHastens recoveryAmerican CollegeSafety programSurgerySuperior outcomesPatient safetyLiterature searchHealthcare ResearchFacilitate recoveryCareProcess measures
2018
Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways Using an Implementation Framework: A Systematic Review
Stone AB, Yuan CT, Rosen MA, Grant MC, Benishek LE, Hanahan E, Lubomski LH, Ko C, Wick EC. Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways Using an Implementation Framework: A Systematic Review. JAMA Surgery 2018, 153: 270-279. PMID: 29344622, DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5565.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEnhanced recovery pathwayFrontline cliniciansSystematic reviewRecovery pathwaysRural hospital locationHigh-quality studiesFull-text screeningInitial search strategyStandardized extraction formHospital stayPerioperative interventionsTraditional carePatient complexityOuter settingExtraction formIntervention characteristicsCFIR domainsPRISMA statementEvidence reviewMultidisciplinary teamInner settingHospital locationConsolidated FrameworkCommon barriersImplementation research
2014
Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement
Field N, Cohen T, Struelens MJ, Palm D, Cookson B, Glynn JR, Gallo V, Ramsay M, Sonnenberg P, MacCannell D, Charlett A, Egger M, Green J, Vineis P, Abubakar I. Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2014, 14: 341-352. PMID: 24631223, DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70324-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEpidemiological studiesInfectious diseasesMolecular epidemiologyControl of infectionMultiple-strain infectionsMolecular epidemiological studiesHealth policy decisionsObservational studySTROBE checklistEpidemiological dataEvidence reviewCommunicable diseasesInfectious disease researchSTROBE statementDiseaseInfectious disease data
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply