Featured Publications
2-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients
Forrest JK, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Rovin JD, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O'Hair D, Bajwa T, Sorajja P, Heiser JC, Merhi W, Mangi A, Spriggs DJ, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti SJ, Teirstein PS, Zorn GL, Tadros P, Tchétché D, Resar JR, Walton A, Gleason TG, Ramlawi B, Iskander A, Caputo R, Oh JK, Huang J, Reardon MJ. 2-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2022, 79: 882-896. PMID: 35241222, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.062.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementEvolut Low Risk trialLow-risk trialsAortic valve replacementPrimary endpointRisk trialsCause mortalityValve replacementTranscatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementLow surgical risk patientsSurgical aortic valve replacementIndependent clinical events committeeEchocardiographic core laboratoryKaplan-Meier ratesSevere aortic stenosisClinical events committeeLow-risk patientsCause mortality ratesSelf-expanding valvesDisabling strokeEchocardiographic outcomesSurgical AVRTAVR groupSurgery groupAdverse eventsTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
Forrest JK, Ramlawi B, Deeb GM, Zahr F, Song HK, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti SJ, Michelena HI, Mangi AA, Skiles JA, Huang J, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis. JAMA Cardiology 2020, 6: 50-57. PMID: 33031491, PMCID: PMC7542521, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4738.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementBicuspid aortic valve stenosisAortic valve replacementAortic valve stenosisLow-risk patientsDevice success rateValve replacementValve stenosisCause mortalityRandomized trialsAmerican Heart Association/American CollegeSevere bicuspid aortic valve stenosisHigh device success rateLow surgical risk patientsPrespecified primary end pointPrimary efficacy end pointEnd pointBicuspid aortic stenosisMean AV gradientThoracic Surgeons scoreEfficacy end pointPrimary end pointLow surgical riskMild paravalvular leakNew permanent pacemakerTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves From the STS/ACC TVT Registry
Forrest JK, Kaple RK, Ramlawi B, Gleason TG, Meduri CU, Yakubov SJ, Jilaihawi H, Liu F, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 13: 1749-1759. PMID: 32473890, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsAortic valve stenosisBicuspid aortic valve stenosisTranscatheter aortic valve replacementEvolut PRO valveAortic valve replacementValve stenosisTVT RegistryCause mortalityValve replacementEvolut RBicuspid valveBicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic ValvesSTS/ACC TVT RegistryThoracic Surgeons/American CollegeTricuspid aortic valve stenosisCardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) RegistryTricuspid aortic stenosisRate of strokeSelf-expanding valvesLow complication rateTricuspid aortic valveAcceptable safety outcomesCardiac comorbiditiesEchocardiographic outcomesAortic stenosisEarly Outcomes With the Evolut PRO Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve With Pericardial Wrap
Forrest JK, Mangi AA, Popma JJ, Khabbaz K, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Yakubov SJ, Watson D, Kodali S, George I, Tadros P, Zorn GL, Brown J, Kipperman R, Saul S, Qiao H, Oh JK, Williams MR. Early Outcomes With the Evolut PRO Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve With Pericardial Wrap. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2018, 11: 160-168. PMID: 29348010, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCause of DeathEchocardiographyFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleMitral Valve InsufficiencyPericardiumProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valveSevere symptomatic aortic stenosisEvolut PRO valveSymptomatic aortic stenosisTranscatheter aortic valveAortic stenosisParavalvular leakAortic valveValve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteriaIndependent echocardiographic core laboratoryTranscatheter aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve systemEchocardiographic core laboratoryPrimary safety endpointPrimary efficacy endpointRemainder of patientsAortic valve replacementProportion of patientsProsthetic valve regurgitationSupra-annular valveEffective orifice areaDisabling strokeCause mortalityEfficacy endpointSafety endpoint3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
Forrest J, Deeb G, Yakubov S, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Ramlawi B, Bajwa T, Teirstein P, DeFrain M, Muppala M, Rutkin B, Chawla A, Jenson B, Chetcuti S, Stoler R, Poulin M, Khabbaz K, Levack M, Goel K, Tchétché D, Lam K, Tonino P, Ito S, Oh J, Huang J, Popma J, Kleiman N, Reardon M, Investigators L, Sorajja P, Byrne T, Kirshner M, Bajwa T, Crouch J, Coselli J, Silva G, Hebeler R, Stoler R, Islam A, Rousou A, Poulin M, Khabbaz K, Bladergroen M, Fail P, Netherland D, Lam K, Tonino W, Sudre A, Berthoumieu P, Tchétché D, Khalili H, Hughes G, Harrison J, De A, Tsau P, van Mieghem N, Larbalestier R, Yong G, Agarwal S, Martin W, Park S, Kleiman N, Reardon M, Mohammadi S, Rodes-Cabau J, Sparling J, Elkins C, Ganzel B, Matthews R, Starnes V, Ando K, Chevalier B, Farge A, DeFrain M, Muppala M, Combs W, Bagur R, Chu M, Fontana G, Dev V, Leya F, Tuchek J, Inglessis I, Jassar A, Piazza N, Lacappelle K, Steinberg D, Katz M, Wang J, Kozina J, Slachman F, Merritt R, Chawla A, Jensen B, Alvarez J, Gooley R, Smith J, Ibrahim R, Cartier R, Rovin J, Fujita T, Rutkin B, Yakubov S, Song H, Zahr F, Miyagawa S, Rajagopal V, Kauten J, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Bhindi R, Brady P, Batra S, Davis T, Iskander A, Heimansohn D, Hermiller J, Takamisawa I, Haldis T, Yamazaki S, Teirstein P, Tada N, Saito S, Merhi W, Leung S, Muller D, Heijmen R, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Knight P, Ling F, Radhakrishnan S, Fremes S, Lehr E, Gafoor S, Noel T, Walton A, Resar J, Adams D, Sharma S, Lilly S, Tadros P, Zorn G, Dauerman H, Ittleman F, Horlick E, Feindel C, Welt F, Sharma V, Markowitz A, Carroll J, Fullerton D, Griffith B, Gupta A, de Marchena E, Salerno T, Chetcuti S, Deeb G, Sultan I, Goel K, Pasupati S, Kon N, Zhao D, Ramlawi B, Forrest J. 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2023, 81: 1663-1674. PMID: 36882136, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementLow-risk patientsCause mortalityPrimary endpointParavalvular regurgitationValve replacementEvolut Low Risk trialLow surgical risk patientsSurgical aortic valve replacementGreater paravalvular regurgitationLow-risk trialsData comparing outcomesLow-risk studiesSupra-annular valveEchocardiographic outcomesSecondary endpointsSurgery groupTAVR patientsRisk patientsSurgery patientsAortic stenosisPacemaker placementTreatment armsMean age
2024
3-Year Outcomes From the Evolut Low Risk TAVR Bicuspid Study
Zahr F, Ramlawi B, Reardon M, Deeb G, Yakubov S, Song H, Kleiman N, Chetcuti S, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Leung S, Merhi W, Rovin J, DeFrain M, Muppala M, Kauten J, Rajagopal V, Huang J, Ito S, Forrest J. 3-Year Outcomes From the Evolut Low Risk TAVR Bicuspid Study. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2024, 17: 1667-1675. PMID: 39048253, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseBioprosthesisFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementRates of all-cause mortalityAll-cause mortalityAortic stenosisThoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scoreThoracic Surgeons Predicted RiskSevere paravalvular aortic regurgitationBicuspid aortic valve anatomyRisk of Mortality scoreEchocardiographic core laboratoryLow-surgical risk patientsAortic valve anatomyKaplan-Meier ratesLow surgical riskClinical events committeeAortic valve replacementSevere aortic stenosisParavalvular aortic regurgitationPermanent pacemaker implantationBicuspid aortic stenosisFavorable hemodynamic performanceEvaluated 3 yearsAttempted implantEchocardiographic outcomesAortic regurgitationReinterventions After CoreValve/Evolut Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis
Grubb K, Lisko J, O'Hair D, Merhi W, Forrest J, Mahoney P, Van Mieghem N, Windecker S, Yakubov S, Williams M, Chetcuti S, Deeb G, Kleiman N, Althouse A, Reardon M. Reinterventions After CoreValve/Evolut Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2024, 17: 1007-1016. PMID: 38573257, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.292.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansIncidenceMalePostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetreatmentRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsSurgical aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementIncidence of reinterventionAortic valve replacementCumulative incidence of reinterventionValve replacementValve reinterventionCumulative incidenceCoreValve transcatheter aortic valve replacementLow incidence of reinterventionSurgical aortic valve replacement patientsSingle-arm studyFirst-generation CoreValveEvolut R/ProParavalvular regurgitationReinterventionRandomized trialsLow incidenceCoreValvePooled dataTranscatheterIncidenceTreatmentYearsEndocarditis
2023
Feasibility of Coronary Access Following Redo-TAVR for Evolut Failure: A Computed Tomography Simulation Study
Tang G, Spencer J, Rogers T, Grubb K, Gleason P, Gada H, Mahoney P, Dauerman H, Forrest J, Reardon M, Blanke P, Leipsic J, Abdel-Wahab M, Attizzani G, Puri R, Caskey M, Chung C, Chen Y, Dudek D, Allen K, Chhatriwalla A, Htun W, Blackman D, Tarantini G, Sanchez J, Schwartz G, Popma J, Sathananthan J. Feasibility of Coronary Access Following Redo-TAVR for Evolut Failure: A Computed Tomography Simulation Study. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 16: e013238. PMID: 37988439, PMCID: PMC10653288, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013238.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRedo-TAVRSAPIEN 3Coronary accessRedo transcatheter aortic valve replacementYounger low-risk patientsFuture coronary accessSAPIEN 3 valveAortic valve replacementLow-risk patientsSelf-expanding valvesPre-TAVR CTValve replacementValve implantationCT planningEvolutImplant positionTomography imagingPatientsCTNodes 4Implant depthTAVRSubstudyNodes 5Valve4-Year Outcomes of Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the Evolut Low Risk Trial
Forrest J, Deeb G, Yakubov S, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Ramlawi B, Bajwa T, Teirstein P, Tchétché D, Huang J, Reardon M, Investigators E. 4-Year Outcomes of Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the Evolut Low Risk Trial. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2023, 82: 2163-2165. PMID: 37877907, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.813.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchFeasibility of redo-TAVI in self-expanding Evolut valves: a CT analysis from the Evolut Low Risk Trial substudy.
Grubb K, Shekiladze N, Spencer J, Perdoncin E, Tang G, Xie J, Lisko J, Sanchez J, Lucas L, Sathananthan J, Rogers T, Deeb G, Fukuhara S, Blanke P, Leipsic J, Forrest J, Reardon M, Gleason P. Feasibility of redo-TAVI in self-expanding Evolut valves: a CT analysis from the Evolut Low Risk Trial substudy. EuroIntervention 2023, 19: e330-e339. PMID: 37067193, PMCID: PMC10333920, DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-22-01125.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRedo-TAVIFlow compromiseEvolut valvesBalloon-expandable SAPIEN 3Transcatheter aortic valve implantationHigher body mass indexAortic valve implantationAortic root dimensionsBody mass indexSinotubular junction diameterSmaller annulus diameterSAPIEN 3Clinical characteristicsValve implantationTranscatheter valveMass indexAnatomical feasibilityCoronary accessFemale sexCoronary heightsAnnulus diameterHigh riskEvolutLower sinusProcedural variablesTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Large Annuli Valves With the Supra-Annular, Self-Expandable Evolut Platform in a Real-World Registry
Dallan L, Tang G, Forrest J, Reardon M, Szeto W, Kodali S, Baeza C, Eisenberg R, Attizzani G. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Large Annuli Valves With the Supra-Annular, Self-Expandable Evolut Platform in a Real-World Registry. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 16: e012623. PMID: 36943929, PMCID: PMC10022658, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012623.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementCardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy RegistryThoracic Surgeons/American CollegeTranscatheter Valve Therapy RegistryValve replacementAortic stenosisAmerican CollegeMultivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modelsAnnulus sizeCox proportional hazards regression modelProportional hazards regression modelsAortic valve reinterventionTricuspid aortic stenosisReal-world registrySevere aortic stenosisBetter clinical outcomesTreatment of patientsHazards regression modelsComputed tomography angiographyLarge annulusValve reinterventionCause mortalityReadmission ratesValve procedures
2022
Site-Level Variation and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following TAVR in the Evolut Low-Risk Trial
Gada H, Vora AN, Tang GHL, Mumtaz M, Forrest JK, Laham RJ, Yakubov SJ, Deeb GM, Rammohan C, Huang J, Reardon MJ. Site-Level Variation and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following TAVR in the Evolut Low-Risk Trial. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2022, 47: 48-54. PMID: 36266154, DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.10.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansPacemaker, ArtificialTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementPermanent pacemaker implantationNew permanent pacemaker implantationAortic valve replacementPPI rateValve replacementPacemaker implantationClinical outcomesBenefits of TAVRSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacementBaseline right bundle branch blockRate of PPIEvolut Low Risk trialSurgical aortic valve replacementRight bundle branch blockLow-risk trialsLeft coronary sinusLow-risk patientsBundle branch blockEvolut valvesCoronary sinusGeneral anesthesiaConduction disordersBranch blockProcedural characteristicsPropensity-Matched 1-Year Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Bicuspid and Tricuspid Patients
Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Ramlawi B, Yakubov SJ, Chetcuti SJ, Kleiman NS, Mangi AA, Zahr F, Song HK, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Heiser J, Merhi W, Murrah CP, Noel T, Kirshner M, Byrne T, Ito S, Huang J, Forrest JK. Propensity-Matched 1-Year Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Bicuspid and Tricuspid Patients. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2022, 15: 511-522. PMID: 35272776, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.027.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansProspective StudiesRiskTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementValve replacementAortic stenosisTricuspid patientsOutcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementEvolut Low Risk trialLow surgical risk patientsIndependent clinical events committeeBicuspid aortic stenosisLow-risk trialsSurgical risk patientsTricuspid aortic stenosisPropensity-matched groupsSerious adverse eventsClinical events committeeIndependent core laboratoryBicuspid aortic valveEffective orifice areaTricuspid groupCause mortalityPrimary endpointTAVR patientsAdverse eventsRisk patients
2021
Coronary Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis
Patel KP, Michail M, Treibel TA, Rathod K, Jones DA, Ozkor M, Kennon S, Forrest JK, Mathur A, Mullen MJ, Lansky A, Baumbach A. Coronary Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 14: 2083-2096. PMID: 34620388, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.058.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCoronary Artery DiseaseHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansRisk FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsAortic valve replacementCoronary artery diseaseAortic stenosisHemodynamic statusCoronary revascularizationValve replacementAssessment of CADPatients Undergoing Aortic Valve ReplacementConcomitant coronary artery diseaseImpact of ASSignificant coronary artery diseaseConcomitant aortic stenosisRole of revascularizationSevere aortic stenosisThird of patientsCohort of patientsDual pathologyArtery diseaseTherapeutic challengeCertain patientsMyocardial ischemiaCoronary assessmentPatientsRevascularizationMultidisciplinary teamRedo‐transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the supra‐annular, self‐expandable Evolut platform: Insights from the Transcatheter valve Therapy Registry
Attizzani GF, Dallan LAP, Forrest JK, Reardon MJ, Szeto WY, Liu F, Pelletier M. Redo‐transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the supra‐annular, self‐expandable Evolut platform: Insights from the Transcatheter valve Therapy Registry. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 99: 869-876. PMID: 34533891, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29941.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansProsthesis DesignRegistriesRisk FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsTranscatheter Valve Therapy RegistryTranscatheter aortic valveRedo-TAVRTVT RegistryRedo transcatheter aortic valve replacementBetter short-term outcomesTotal aortic regurgitationAortic valve replacementLow-risk patientsShort-term outcomesHospital mortalityIndex hospitalizationAortic regurgitationValve replacementDevice successEvolut RSafety profileMyocardial infarctionAortic valveEvolut PROPatientsRegistryMean gradientOutcomesEvolutOutcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Supra-Annular Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement From the STS/ACC TVT Registry
Tang GHL, Sengupta A, Alexis SL, Bapat VN, Adams DH, Sharma SK, Kini AS, Kodali SK, Ramlawi B, Gada H, Vora AN, Forrest JK, Kaple RK, Liu F, Reardon MJ. Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Supra-Annular Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 14: 964-976. PMID: 33958170, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.040.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansProsthesis DesignRegistriesRisk FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsSevere prosthesis-patient mismatchTranscatheter aortic valve replacementProsthesis-patient mismatchDe novo stenosisAortic valve replacementTVT RegistryNovo stenosisValve replacementSTS/ACC TVT RegistryHigh residual gradientPre-procedural factorsLong-term outcomesAortic gradientAortic annulusClinical outcomesSurgical bioprosthesesAdverse outcomesClinical impactPatientsResidual gradientReadmissionRegistryMortalityLinear mixed modelsOutcomes
2020
Three-Year Outcomes With a Contemporary Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valve From the Evolut PRO US Clinical Study
Wyler von Ballmoos MC, Reardon MJ, Williams MR, Mangi AA, Kleiman NS, Yakubov SJ, Watson D, Kodali S, George I, Tadros P, Zorn GL, Brown J, Kipperman R, Oh JK, Qiao H, Forrest JK. Three-Year Outcomes With a Contemporary Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valve From the Evolut PRO US Clinical Study. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2020, 26: 12-16. PMID: 33199247, DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.11.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementEvolut PRO valveParavalvular regurgitationUS clinical studiesCause mortalityClinical studiesNew York Heart Association class ISelf-expanding transcatheter valveValve Academic Research ConsortiumExtreme surgical riskMild paravalvular regurgitationAcademic Research ConsortiumAortic valve replacementIndependent core laboratoryThree-Year OutcomesSelf-expanding prosthesisLong-term resultsEffective orifice areaValve thrombosisCardiovascular mortalityExcellent hemodynamicsValve replacementEchocardiographic measuresSurgical riskTranscatheter valveImpact of Repositioning on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Self-Expandable Valve
Attizzani GF, Dallan LAP, Markowitz A, Yakubov SJ, Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Forrest JK, Mangi AA, Huang J, Popma JJ. Impact of Repositioning on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Self-Expandable Valve. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 13: 1816-1824. PMID: 32763073, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.028.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsEvolut RPrimary outcomeValve Academic Research Consortium-2Academic Research Consortium-2Evolut Low Risk trialPrior percutaneous coronary interventionTranscatheter aortic valve replacementEvolut PRO valveLow-risk trialsThoracic Surgeons scoreAortic valve replacementPercutaneous coronary interventionSelf-expandable valvesTranscatheter aortic valveDisabling strokeEvolut valvesSURTAVI trialCause mortalityTrial patientsCoronary interventionSecondary outcomesSurgeons scoreValve replacementClinical outcomesAortic valveThree Generations of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves A Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry
Forrest JK, Kaple RK, Tang GHL, Yakubov SJ, Nazif TM, Williams MR, Zhang A, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Three Generations of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves A Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 13: 170-179. PMID: 31973793, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsEvolut PRO valveTranscatheter aortic valveTVT RegistryAortic regurgitationEvolut RAortic valveSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valveSTS/ACC TVT RegistryThoracic Surgeons/American CollegeMean aortic valve gradientTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) technologyCardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) RegistryTricuspid aortic stenosisAortic valve gradientSignificant aortic regurgitationMild aortic regurgitationSupra-annular valveTranscatheter valve technologyValve gradientHemodynamic statusAortic stenosisAortic annulusEarly outcomesEchocardiographic dataPatient risk
2017
Biomarkers in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Prevalent, But Are They Prognostic?∗
Forrest JK, Hermany PL. Biomarkers in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Prevalent, But Are They Prognostic?∗. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2017, 10: 1561-1563. PMID: 28797434, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.043.Peer-Reviewed Original Research