2022
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes With 35 Years Duration From the DCCT/EDIC Study.
Gubitosi-Klug RA, Braffett BH, Bebu I, Johnson ML, Farrell K, Kenny D, Trapani VR, Meadema-Mayer L, Soliman EZ, Pop-Busui R, Lachin JM, Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes With 35 Years Duration From the DCCT/EDIC Study. Diabetes Care 2022, 45: 659-665. PMID: 35076697, PMCID: PMC8918229, DOI: 10.2337/dc21-0629.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsType 1 diabetesContinuous glucose monitoringInsulin pumpDCCT/EDIC studyComplications Trial/EpidemiologyGlucose monitoringPercent timeRelevant clinical goalsYears of ageMean sensor glucoseSubset of adultsComplications StudyEDIC studyEntire recording periodOlder patientsGlycemic excursionsDiabetes controlSignificant hypoglycemiaDiabetes InterventionsYears durationHypoglycemiaSensor glucoseClinical goalsHyperglycemic excursionsType 1
2020
Refractive Error and Retinopathy Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study
Hainsworth DP, Gao X, Bebu I, Das A, de Koo L, Barkmeier AJ, Tamborlane W, Lachin JM, Aiello LP, Group D. Refractive Error and Retinopathy Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study. Ophthalmology 2020, 128: 554-560. PMID: 32941962, PMCID: PMC7956062, DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDiabetic macular edemaDiabetic retinopathyRefractive errorProliferative DRMacular edemaDiabetes controlDiabetes InterventionsRisk factorsUnadjusted modelsComplications Trial/EpidemiologyStages of DRCox proportional hazards modelDCCT treatment groupEDIC years 4Refractive error statusStandard fundus photographsAlbumin excretion rateDuration of diabetesIndependent risk factorDCCT/EDICDiastolic blood pressureSignificant macular edemaProliferative diabetic retinopathyPotential risk factorsProportional hazards model
2005
Comparison of fingerstick hemoglobin A1c levels assayed by DCA 2000 with the DCCT/EDIC central laboratory assay: results of a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study
Tamborlane WV, Kollman C, Steffes MW, Ruedy KJ, Dongyuan X, Beck RW, Chase P, Fox LA, Wilson DM, Tsalikian E. Comparison of fingerstick hemoglobin A1c levels assayed by DCA 2000 with the DCCT/EDIC central laboratory assay: results of a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study. Pediatric Diabetes 2005, 6: 13-16. PMID: 15787896, DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-543x.2005.00088.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDCA 2000Central laboratory valuesHbA1c valuesClinical centersLaboratory valuesComplications Trial/EpidemiologyType 1 diabetes mellitusMean differenceDiabetes researchBaseline HbA1c levelsHemoglobin A1c levelsCentral laboratoryOutpatient clinical trialAdditional blood samplesCentral laboratory methodHbA1c levelsA1c levelsDiabetes mellitusDiabetes practiceDiabetes controlDiabetes InterventionsClinical trialsSame visitBlood samplesReference standard