2023
Local Control and Survival Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases From Gastrointestinal Primaries: An International Multicenter Analysis
Singh R, Bowden G, Mathieu D, Perlow H, Palmer J, Elhamdani S, Shepard M, Liang Y, Nabeel A, Reda W, Tawadros S, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby A, Emad R, Elazzazi A, Warnick R, Gozal Y, Daly M, McShane B, Addis-Jackson M, Karthikeyan G, Smith S, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Kaisman-Elbaz T, Yang H, Wei Z, Legarreta A, Hess J, Templeton K, Pikis S, Mantziaris G, Simonova G, Liscak R, Peker S, Samanci Y, Chiang V, Niranjan A, Kersh C, Lee C, Trifiletti D, Lunsford L, Sheehan J. Local Control and Survival Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases From Gastrointestinal Primaries: An International Multicenter Analysis. Neurosurgery 2023, 93: 592-598. PMID: 36942965, DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002456.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsKarnofsky performance statusStereotactic radiosurgeryOverall survivalBrain metastasesUnivariate analysisLocal controlGI primaryExtracranial metastasesPrognostic factorsBrain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgeryAssociated with inferior LCAssociated with inferior OSMedian Karnofsky performance statusEvaluate potential prognostic factorsInternational multicenter analysisPlanning target volumePotential prognostic factorsKaplan-Meier analysisOne-yearProportional hazards modelInferior LCInferior OSOS ratesLC ratesGastrointestinal primary
2022
Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) for Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: Initial Report of the Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA and Update of the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA Including the Effect of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Other Prognostic Factors
Sperduto PW, De B, Li J, Carpenter D, Kirkpatrick J, Milligan M, Shih HA, Kutuk T, Kotecha R, Higaki H, Otsuka M, Aoyama H, Bourgoin M, Roberge D, Dajani S, Sachdev S, Gainey J, Buatti JM, Breen W, Brown PD, Ni L, Braunstein S, Gallitto M, Wang TJC, Shanley R, Lou E, Shiao J, Gaspar LE, Tanabe S, Nakano T, An Y, Chiang V, Zeng L, Soliman H, Elhalawani H, Cagney D, Thomas E, Boggs DH, Ahluwalia MS, Mehta MP. Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) for Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: Initial Report of the Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA and Update of the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA Including the Effect of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Other Prognostic Factors. International Journal Of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 2022, 114: 60-74. PMID: 35331827, PMCID: PMC9378572, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-small cell lung cancerSmall cell lung cancerGraded Prognostic AssessmentBrain metastasesSignificant prognostic factorsPrognostic factorsDeath ligand 1Cell lung cancerLung cancerPD-L1Lung adenocarcinomaMedian survivalNSCLC adenocarcinomaPrognostic assessmentInitial reportMulti-institutional retrospective databaseProgrammed Death Ligand 1PD-L1 1Tumor molecular statusOverall median survivalPD-L1 expressionLigand 1Anaplastic lymphoma kinaseEpidermal growth factor receptorGrowth factor receptor
2021
Incidence and characteristics of metastatic intracranial lesions in stage III and IV melanoma: a single institute retrospective analysis
Sandhu MRS, Chiang VL, Tran T, Yu JB, Weiss S, Goldberg S, Aboian M, Kluger HM, Mahajan A. Incidence and characteristics of metastatic intracranial lesions in stage III and IV melanoma: a single institute retrospective analysis. Journal Of Neuro-Oncology 2021, 154: 197-203. PMID: 34351544, DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03813-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBrain NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceMaleMelanomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTesticular NeoplasmsConceptsStage IV melanomaMetastatic brain lesionsStage IIIInitial diagnosisTumor RegistryOverall incidenceBrain lesionsBM incidenceSingle-institute retrospective analysisBM developmentBrain metastases incidenceIncidence of BMInstitution's tumor registryStage III patientsTime of diagnosisMetastatic intracranial lesionsCommon genetic mutationsTumor genetic profileGenetic profileBM occurrenceMedian durationAdvanced melanomaSurveillance regimenIII patientsMedian time
2020
Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient.
Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, Cagney D, Aizer A, Lin NU, Nesbit E, Kruser TJ, Chan J, Braunstein S, Lee J, Kirkpatrick JP, Breen W, Brown PD, Shi D, Shih HA, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto WA, Lou E, Everett A, Boggs DH, Masucci L, Roberge D, Remick J, Plichta K, Buatti JM, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Wu CC, Wang TJC, Bryant J, Chuong M, An Y, Chiang V, Nakano T, Aoyama H, Mehta MP. Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 3773-3784. PMID: 32931399, PMCID: PMC7655019, DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01255.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGraded Prognostic AssessmentDiagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic AssessmentBrain metastasesPrognostic factorsClinical trialsPrognostic assessmentLarge contemporary cohortSignificant prognostic factorsEnrollment of patientsNew prognostic factorsMulti-institutional databaseMedian survivalMultivariable analysisContemporary cohortWorse prognosisCell lungIndividualize treatmentTreatment choicePoor survivalRenal cancerPatientsPromising treatmentExpansion of eligibilityMetastasisPrimary siteLaser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) vs. bevacizumab for radiation necrosis in previously irradiated brain metastases
Sujijantarat N, Hong CS, Owusu KA, Elsamadicy AA, Antonios JP, Koo AB, Baehring JM, Chiang VL. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) vs. bevacizumab for radiation necrosis in previously irradiated brain metastases. Journal Of Neuro-Oncology 2020, 148: 641-649. PMID: 32602021, DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03570-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLaser interstitial thermal therapyLonger overall survivalRadiation necrosisInterstitial thermal therapyBrain metastasesOverall survivalMedian volume decreaseMedian volume increaseBrain metastasis patientsPre-treatment patient characteristicsRetrospective chart reviewResultsTwenty-five patientsPre-treatment factorsBevacizumab patientsChart reviewMetastasis patientsLocal recurrencePatient characteristicsTreatment optionsTreatment responseBevacizumabPatientsLesional volumeThermal therapyStatistical significanceBeyond an Updated Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA): A Prognostic Index and Trends in Treatment and Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases From 1985 to Today
Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, Cagney D, Aizer A, Lin NU, Nesbit E, Kruser TJ, Chan J, Braunstein S, Lee J, Kirkpatrick JP, Breen W, Brown PD, Shi D, Shih HA, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto W, Lou E, Everett A, Boggs DH, Masucci L, Roberge D, Remick J, Plichta K, Buatti JM, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Wu CC, Wang TJC, Bryant J, Chuong M, Yu J, Chiang V, Nakano T, Aoyama H, Mehta MP. Beyond an Updated Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA): A Prognostic Index and Trends in Treatment and Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases From 1985 to Today. International Journal Of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 2020, 107: 334-343. PMID: 32084525, PMCID: PMC7276246, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDiagnosis-specific prognostic factorsHuman epidermal receptor 2Prognostic factorsMedian survivalBreast-GPABrain metastasesBreast cancerCohort BCohort APrognostic indexReceptor 2Tumor subtypesBreast cancer brain metastasesKaplan-Meier survival estimatesCancer brain metastasesGraded Prognostic AssessmentKarnofsky performance statusLarge contemporary cohortLog-rank testFuture clinical trialsNew prognostic factorsGPA 0Extracranial metastasesPerformance statusBetter prognosis
2019
Prognosticating brain tumor patient survival after laser thermotherapy: Comparison between neuroradiological reading and semi-quantitative analysis of MRI data
Hanna JM, Temares D, Hyder F, Rothman DL, Fulbright RK, Chiang VL, Coman D. Prognosticating brain tumor patient survival after laser thermotherapy: Comparison between neuroradiological reading and semi-quantitative analysis of MRI data. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2019, 65: 45-54. PMID: 31675529, DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.09.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchA Proposed Grading Scale for Predicting Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas
Mohammed N, Hung YC, Chen CJ, Xu Z, Schlesinger D, Kano H, Chiang V, Hess J, Lee J, Mathieu D, Kaufmann AM, Grills IS, Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, Chytka T, Janouskova L, Feliciano CE, Mercado RR, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. A Proposed Grading Scale for Predicting Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas. Neurosurgery 2019, 87: 247-255. PMID: 31584074, PMCID: PMC7528658, DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz401.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDural arteriovenous fistulaCranial dural arteriovenous fistulasCortical venous refluxFavorable outcomeStereotactic radiosurgeryGrading systemIntracerebral hemorrhageArteriovenous fistulaScoring systemGrading scaleKaplan-Meier analysisPrior intracerebral hemorrhageClass II patientsLogistic regression analysisPractical grading systemDAVF obliterationVenous refluxII patientsClinical parametersSinus locationPredicting OutcomeSystematic reviewClass IIIPatientsROC analysisMulti-institutional validation of brain metastasis velocity, a recently defined predictor of outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery
McTyre ER, Soike MH, Farris M, Ayala-Peacock DN, Hepel JT, Page BR, Shen C, Kleinberg L, Contessa JN, Corso C, Chiang V, Henson-Masters A, Cramer CK, Ruiz J, Pasche B, Watabe K, D'Agostino R, Su J, Laxton AW, Tatter SB, Fiveash JB, Ahluwalia M, Kotecha R, Chao ST, Braunstein SE, Attia A, Chung C, Chan MD. Multi-institutional validation of brain metastasis velocity, a recently defined predictor of outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery. Radiotherapy And Oncology 2019, 142: 168-174. PMID: 31526671, DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBrain metastasis velocityDistant brain failureMedian overall survivalOverall survivalBrain metastasesPredictors of OSInitial brain metastasesNew brain metastasesWhole brain radiationKaplan-Meier methodHigh-risk groupPredictors of outcomeProportional hazards methodsMulti-institutional settingMulti-institutional validationMultivariate regression modelingInitial SRSBrain radiationSalvage modalityInitial treatmentBrain failureRecurrence rateValidation cohortBMV groupMelanoma histologyBrain Metastasis From Renal-Cell Carcinoma: An Institutional Study
Suarez-Sarmiento A, Nguyen KA, Syed JS, Nolte A, Ghabili K, Cheng M, Liu S, Chiang V, Kluger H, Hurwitz M, Shuch B. Brain Metastasis From Renal-Cell Carcinoma: An Institutional Study. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 2019, 17: e1163-e1170. PMID: 31519468, DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRCC brain metastasesRecurrence-free survivalRenal cell carcinomaBrain metastasesOverall survivalClinical trialsAdvanced renal cell carcinomaCentral nervous system treatmentClear cell renal cell carcinomaMedian overall survivalSingle institution experienceGood local controlKaplan-Meier methodAggressive therapyCNS recurrenceTreatment eraCumulative incidenceExtracranial metastasesMetastatic diseaseSystemic therapyInitial presentationLocal therapyClinical symptomsRCC patientsCell carcinomaSurvival and prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and brain metastases: have we made progress?
Sperduto PW, Fang P, Li J, Breen W, Brown PD, Cagney D, Aizer A, Yu J, Chiang V, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Myrehaug S, Sahgal A, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Cameron B, Attia A, Molitoris J, Wu CC, Wang TJC, Lockney N, Beal K, Parkhurst J, Buatti JM, Shanley R, Lou E, Tandberg DD, Kirkpatrick JP, Shi D, Shih HA, Chuong M, Saito H, Aoyama H, Masucci L, Roberge D, Mehta MP. Survival and prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and brain metastases: have we made progress? Translational Research 2019, 208: 63-72. PMID: 30885538, PMCID: PMC6527460, DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.02.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGI cancer patientsBrain metastasesGraded Prognostic AssessmentCancer patientsPrognostic factorsNew brain metastasesLarge contemporary cohortPrognosis of patientsLog-rank testMedian survival estimatesContemporary cohortPrognostic indexClinical parametersGastrointestinal cancerPrimary diagnosisPrognostic assessmentRetrospective IRBPatientsFirst treatmentDemographic dataSurvival estimatesCurrent cohortCohortTreatmentPrognosis
2018
Estimating survival for renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases: an update of the Renal Graded Prognostic Assessment tool
Sperduto PW, Deegan BJ, Li J, Jethwa KR, Brown PD, Lockney N, Beal K, Rana NG, Attia A, Tseng CL, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto WA, Lou E, Zahra A, Buatti JM, Yu JB, Chiang V, Molitoris JK, Masucci L, Roberge D, Shi DD, Shih HA, Olson A, Kirkpatrick JP, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Mehta MP. Estimating survival for renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases: an update of the Renal Graded Prognostic Assessment tool. Neuro-Oncology 2018, 20: 1652-1660. PMID: 30418657, PMCID: PMC6231200, DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrognostic assessment toolsBrain metastasesRenal cell carcinomaMedian survivalPrognostic factorsAdditional significant prognostic factorsRenal cell carcinoma patientsRetrospective institutional review boardNew brain metastasesKarnofsky performance statusOverall median survivalCell carcinoma patientsSignificant prognostic factorsFuture clinical trialsClinical decision makingInstitutional review boardAssessment toolPerformance statusCommon complicationExtracranial metastasesHazard ratioCarcinoma patientsContemporary cohortRCC patientsWorse prognosisBRAF V600 Mutation and BRAF Kinase Inhibitors in Conjunction With Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Melanoma Metastases: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Mastorakos P, Xu Z, Yu J, Hess J, Qian J, Chatrath A, Taylor DG, Kondziolka D, Warnick R, Chiang V, Sheehan J. BRAF V600 Mutation and BRAF Kinase Inhibitors in Conjunction With Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Melanoma Metastases: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Neurosurgery 2018, 84: 868-880. PMID: 29846702, PMCID: PMC6505443, DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy203.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMelanoma brain metastasesBrain metastasesBRAF inhibitorsStereotactic radiosurgeryBRAF mutationsIntracerebral hematomaDiagnosis of BMEffects of BRAFiMulticenter retrospective cohort studyIntracranial melanoma metastasesPD-1 inhibitorsMulticenter retrospective studyRetrospective cohort studyKaplan-Meier methodologyPositive prognostic factorBRAF V600 mutationBRAF mutation statusBRAF kinase inhibitorsMultivariate regression analysisWild-type BRAFCohort studyHazard ratioMedian survivalIndependent predictorsPrognostic factorsEffect of Targeted Therapies on Prognostic Factors, Patterns of Care, and Survival in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases
Sperduto PW, Deegan BJ, Li J, Jethwa KR, Brown PD, Lockney N, Beal K, Rana NG, Attia A, Tseng CL, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto WA, Lou E, Zahra A, Buatti JM, Yu JB, Chiang V, Molitoris JK, Masucci L, Roberge D, Shi DD, Shih HA, Olson A, Kirkpatrick JP, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Mehta MP. Effect of Targeted Therapies on Prognostic Factors, Patterns of Care, and Survival in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases. International Journal Of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 2018, 101: 845-853. PMID: 29976497, PMCID: PMC6925530, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellCause of DeathCranial IrradiationCytokinesFemaleHemoglobinsHumansImmunotherapyKarnofsky Performance StatusKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultConceptsPatterns of careNew brain metastasesBrain metastasesLarge contemporary cohortPrognostic factorsMedian survivalContemporary cohortRCC patientsDiagnosis of BMWhole-brain radiation therapyRenal cell carcinoma patientsRetrospective institutional review boardBrain metastasis therapySystemic treatment optionsAdditional prognostic factorsCell carcinoma patientsRenal cell carcinomaInstitutional review boardNonneurologic causesCarcinoma patientsImproved survivalNeurologic causesMultivariable analysisClinical parametersPresent cohort
2017
Estimating Survival in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
Sperduto PW, Jiang W, Brown PD, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Wattson DA, Shih HA, Bangdiwala A, Shanley R, Lockney NA, Beal K, Lou E, Amatruda T, Sperduto WA, Kirkpatrick JP, Yeh N, Gaspar LE, Molitoris JK, Masucci L, Roberge D, Yu J, Chiang V, Mehta M. Estimating Survival in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA). International Journal Of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 2017, 99: 812-816. PMID: 29063850, PMCID: PMC6925529, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2454.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDiagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic AssessmentGraded Prognostic AssessmentSignificant prognostic factorsBrain metastasesMelanoma-molGPAPrognostic factorsMelanoma patientsPrognostic assessmentMultiple Cox regressionMedian survival timeRetrospective database analysisLog-rank testHeterogeneous patient populationClinical decision makingTreatment eraHazard ratioMedian survivalMultivariable analysisWorse prognosisCox regressionPatient populationSurvival timePatientsMetastasisCurrent cohortCumulative Intracranial Tumor Volume Augments the Prognostic Value of Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment Model for Survival in Patients with Melanoma Cerebral Metastases
Hirshman BR, Wilson BR, Ali MA, Schupper AJ, Proudfoot JA, Goetsch SJ, Carter BS, Sinclair G, Bartek J, Chiang V, Fogarty G, Hong A, Chen CC. Cumulative Intracranial Tumor Volume Augments the Prognostic Value of Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment Model for Survival in Patients with Melanoma Cerebral Metastases. Neurosurgery 2017, 83: 237-244. PMID: 28973506, DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx380.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCumulative intracranial tumor volumeIntracranial tumor volumeMelanoma brain metastasesBrain metastasesPrognostic valueDS-GPATumor volumeStereotactic radiosurgeryIndependent cohortKey prognostic variablesPrognostic assessment modelPrognostic assessment scaleKarnofsky performance statusNet reclassification indexCerebral metastasesPerformance statusMelanoma patientsPrognostic utilityIntracranial metastasesReclassification indexPrognostic accuracyPrognostic scalesPrognostic variablesPatientsMelanoma cohortImproving the Prognostic Value of Disease-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment Model for Renal Cell Carcinoma by Incorporation of Cumulative Intracranial Tumor Volume
Ali MA, Hirshman BR, Wilson B, Schupper AJ, Joshi R, Proudfoot JA, Goetsch SJ, Alksne JF, Ott K, Aiyama H, Nagano O, Carter BS, Chiang V, Serizawa T, Yamamoto M, Chen CC. Improving the Prognostic Value of Disease-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment Model for Renal Cell Carcinoma by Incorporation of Cumulative Intracranial Tumor Volume. World Neurosurgery 2017, 108: 151-156. PMID: 28754641, PMCID: PMC5705321, DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.109.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCumulative intracranial tumor volumeNumber of BMKarnofsky performance scoreNet reclassification indexIntracranial tumor volumePrognostic assessment modelBrain metastasesPrognostic valueStereotactic radiosurgeryLogistic regression modelsTumor volumeMultivariable Cox proportional hazards modelsRenal cell carcinoma patientsUnivariable logistic regression modelsMultivariable logistic regression modelCox proportional hazards modelNew brain metastasesRCC brain metastasesCell carcinoma patientsImportant prognostic variablesRenal cell carcinomaProportional hazards modelRCC patient survivalBM patientsDS-GPAEstimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA)
Sperduto PW, Yang TJ, Beal K, Pan H, Brown PD, Bangdiwala A, Shanley R, Yeh N, Gaspar LE, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Boyle J, Kirkpatrick JP, Mak KS, Shih HA, Engelman A, Roberge D, Arvold ND, Alexander B, Awad MM, Contessa J, Chiang V, Hardie J, Ma D, Lou E, Sperduto W, Mehta MP. Estimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA). JAMA Oncology 2017, 3: 827-831. PMID: 27892978, PMCID: PMC5824323, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3834.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDiagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic AssessmentBrain metastasesGraded Prognostic AssessmentFuture clinical trialsLung cancerLung-molGPAMedian survivalPrognostic factorsHazard ratioClinical trialsMAIN OUTCOMEPrognostic assessmentLung-molGPA scoreOverall median survivalKarnofsky performance statusMultiple Cox regressionSignificant prognostic factorsCell lung cancerRetrospective database analysisCancer-related mortalityLog-rank testHeterogeneous patient populationClinical decision makingExtracranial metastasesOverall survivalThe Prognostic Value of BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS Mutations in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases
Sperduto PW, Jiang W, Brown PD, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Wattson DA, Shih HA, Bangdiwala A, Shanley R, Lockney NA, Beal K, Lou E, Amatruda T, Sperduto WA, Kirkpatrick JP, Yeh N, Gaspar LE, Molitoris JK, Masucci L, Roberge D, Yu J, Chiang V, Mehta M. The Prognostic Value of BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS Mutations in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases. International Journal Of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 2017, 98: 1069-1077. PMID: 28721890, PMCID: PMC6925531, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, rasHumansImmunotherapyLinear ModelsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricTime FactorsConceptsBRAF-negative patientsBRAF-positive patientsBrain metastasesMedian survivalC-kit mutationsMelanoma patientsPrimary diagnosisWhole-brain radiation therapyOverall median survivalMulti-institutional databaseGene mutation statusOverall survivalInitial treatmentMedian timeTreatment patternsClinical parametersBRAF statusPrognostic valueNRAS mutationsRadiation therapyPatientsMutation statusMetastasisC-kitMEK inhibitors
2016
Timing and type of immune checkpoint therapy affect the early radiographic response of melanoma brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery
Qian JM, Yu JB, Kluger HM, Chiang VL. Timing and type of immune checkpoint therapy affect the early radiographic response of melanoma brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery. Cancer 2016, 122: 3051-3058. PMID: 27285122, PMCID: PMC5030143, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30138.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMedian percent reductionImmune checkpoint therapyLesional responseStereotactic radiosurgeryCheckpoint therapyLesion volumeAnti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4Anti-programmed cell death protein 1T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4Anti-PD-1 therapyGreater median percent reductionsCell death protein 1Administration of immunotherapyWeeks of immunotherapyMelanoma brain metastasesDeath protein 1Type of immunotherapyWilcoxon rank sum testRank sum testNonconcurrent therapyBrain metastasesMelanoma patientsTreatment of cancerSingle institutionPercent reduction