Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort
Gleason J, Reddy U, Chen Z, Grobman W, Wapner R, Steller J, Simhan H, Scifres C, Blue N, Parry S, Grantz K. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2023 PMID: 38151220, PMCID: PMC11196385, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.034.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComposite perinatal morbidityFetal growth standardsPerinatal morbidityNeonatal morbidityWorld Health OrganizationGrowth standardsEunice Kennedy Shriver National InstituteNulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes StudyHighest AUCComposite neonatal morbiditySubsequent neonatal morbidityU.S. clinical centersFetal growth restrictionRisk of morbidityRace/Management of pregnancyPregnancy Outcomes StudyAntenatal monitoringNulliparous womenFetal weightFirst trimesterVisit 2Visit 3US cohortClinical centersFetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
Leon-Martinez D, Lundsberg L, Culhane J, Zhang J, Son M, Reddy U. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use? American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2023, 229: 678.e1-678.e16. PMID: 37348779, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeonatal composite outcomeComposite outcomeFetal growth restrictionGestational ageFetal weightWeeks of gestationPositive likelihood ratioGrowth restrictionNonanomalous singleton pregnanciesPoor neonatal outcomeRetrospective cohort studySingle academic centerWeeks of deliveryDays of deliveryFetal growth referencesElectronic medical recordsProportion of fetusesLikelihood ratioNeonatal morbidityNeonatal outcomesPerinatal outcomesCohort studySingleton pregnanciesNeonatal dataMedical records