2024
Anticoagulation Alone vs Anticoagulation Plus Aspirin or DAPT Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
Reinhardt S, Gibson D, Hsu J, Kapadia S, Yeh R, Price M, Piccini J, Nair D, Christen T, Allocco D, Freeman J. Anticoagulation Alone vs Anticoagulation Plus Aspirin or DAPT Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2024, 84: 889-900. PMID: 39197978, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.067.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLeft atrial appendage occlusionRate of adverse eventsAdverse eventsLAA closure deviceAppendage occlusionAntithrombotic strategiesP2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitorsDays of follow-upMultivariable Cox proportional hazards regressionClosure deviceRisk of adverse eventsCox proportional hazards regressionWatchman FLX deviceDual antiplatelet therapyDevice-related thrombusProportional hazards regressionStroke/transient ischemic attackAntithrombotic regimensFLX deviceAntiplatelet therapyDOACsGroup patientsFollow-upMultivariate analysisHazards regression
2022
Comfort Measures Only in Myocardial Infarction: Prevalence of This Status, Change Over Time, and Predictors From a Nationwide Study
Haghighat L, Reinhardt SW, Saly DL, Lu D, Matsouaka RA, Wang TY, Desai NR. Comfort Measures Only in Myocardial Infarction: Prevalence of This Status, Change Over Time, and Predictors From a Nationwide Study. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And Outcomes 2022, 15: e007610. PMID: 35041476, DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.007610.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionChest Pain-MI RegistryACTION Registry-GWTGHospital major bleedingIndependent patient characteristicsRetrospective cohort studyHigh-risk patientsMortality risk scoreAggressive initial managementHigh mortality rateMedian odds ratioCMO patientsHospital complicationsMajor bleedingCardiogenic shockCohort studyDiagnostic catheterizationMost patientsNonprivate insurancePatient characteristicsInitial managementProcedural complicationsSuch patientsMale gender
2020
Sex Differences in Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure
Gruen J, Caraballo C, Miller PE, McCullough M, Mezzacappa C, Ravindra N, Mullan CW, Reinhardt SW, Mori M, Velazquez E, Geirsson A, Ahmad T, Desai NR. Sex Differences in Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure. JACC Heart Failure 2020, 8: 770-779. PMID: 32653446, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.04.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdverse eventsVentricular assist deviceClinical outcomesPotential underuseHigh riskAssist deviceEnd-stage heartWomen 65 yearsRisk of deathContinuous-flow LVADYears of ageAdvanced treatment optionsSex differencesHeart transplantationMultivariable adjustmentHeart failureHeart transplantSimilar incidenceTreatment optionsSimilar riskSurvival analysisLVADPatientsDevice malfunctionWomen
2019
Clinical Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Older Adults An INTERMACS Analysis
Caraballo C, DeFilippis EM, Nakagawa S, Ravindra NG, Miller PE, Mezzacappa C, McCullough M, Gruen J, Levin A, Reinhardt S, Mullan C, Ali A, Maurer MS, Desai NR, Ahmad T, Topkara VK. Clinical Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Older Adults An INTERMACS Analysis. JACC Heart Failure 2019, 7: 1069-1078. PMID: 31779930, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.10.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsYears of ageVentricular assist device implantationAssist device implantationOlder adultsElderly patientsLVAD implantationDevice implantationMultivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modelCox proportional hazards regression modelKaplan-Meier survival estimatesMechanically Assisted Circulatory SupportProportional hazards regression modelsMechanical circulatory support technologyPost-LVAD outcomesHeart failure populationLog-rank testingSerum albumin levelPredictors of survivalPost-LVAD implantationHazards regression modelsPredictors of outcomeAge-specific outcomesAntithrombotic regimenDurable MCSINTERMACS AnalysisClinical Implications of Respiratory Failure in Patients Receiving Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure
Miller PE, Caraballo C, Ravindra NG, Mezzacappa C, McCullough M, Gruen J, Levin A, Reinhardt S, Ali A, Desai NR, Ahmad T. Clinical Implications of Respiratory Failure in Patients Receiving Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure. Circulation Heart Failure 2019, 12: e006369. PMID: 31707800, DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.119.006369.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleFrailtyHealth StatusHeart FailureHeart-Assist DevicesHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLungMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftConceptsMechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 patientsVentricular assist device implantationProfile 1 patientsAssist device implantationRespiratory failureInteragency RegistryLVAD implantationCirculatory supportDevice implantationMechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1Right ventricular assist device implantationLeft ventricular assist device implantationAdvanced heart failure patientsEnd-stage heart failureMechanically Assisted Circulatory SupportAdvanced heart failure populationHeart failure populationHeart failure patientsLandmark clinical trialsMechanical circulatory supportContinuous-flow LVADVentricular assist devicePostimplant complicationsFailure patientsLVAD placement