1990
The Injured Canine Cervical Spine After Six Months of Healing
CRISCO J, PANJABI M, WANG E, PRICE M, PELKER R. The Injured Canine Cervical Spine After Six Months of Healing. Spine 1990, 15: 1047-1052. PMID: 2263970, DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199015100-00012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsC4-C5 levelCervical spineMonths of healingDegree of severityFlexion-extension rangeCommon siteSpinal injuryInjury severityCanine cervical spineCanine modelControl groupIntervertebral motionBiomechanical testingSpineMonthsBiomechanical characteristicsInjurySeverityCanine spineHealingLateral bendingVivo behaviorAxial rotationPure momentsSimilar resultsThe Injured Canine Cervical Spine After Six Months of Healing
CRISCO J, PANJABI M, WANG E, PRICE M, PELKER R. The Injured Canine Cervical Spine After Six Months of Healing. Spine 1990, 15: 1047-1052. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199010000-00012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchC4-C5 levelCervical spineMonths of healingDegree of severityFlexion-extension rangeCommon siteSpinal injuryInjury severityCanine cervical spineCanine modelControl groupIntervertebral motionBiomechanical testingSpineMonthsBiomechanical characteristicsInjurySeverityCanine spineHealingLateral bendingVivo behaviorAxial rotationPure momentsSimilar results
1989
Allograft incorporation: A biomechanical evaluation in a rat model
Pelker R, McKay J, Troiano N, Panjabi M, Friedlaender G. Allograft incorporation: A biomechanical evaluation in a rat model. Journal Of Orthopaedic Research® 1989, 7: 585-589. PMID: 2786956, DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100070417.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLewis ratsLevel of freezingImmunologic responseSprague-Dawley rat femursRat modelImmune responseAllogeneic boneFresh allograftsOsteosynthesis siteBiomechanical evaluationBiomechanical testingBiologic responseSubsequent healingAllograftsRat femurRatsIntact boneBoneFemurSignificant levelsResponseTransplantationTransplantGraftWeeks