2024
Diandric triploid partial mole versus digynic nonmolar triploidy: is morphological assessment sufficient for the diagnostic distinction?
Nagy A, Niu N, Sun T, Buza N, Hui P. Diandric triploid partial mole versus digynic nonmolar triploidy: is morphological assessment sufficient for the diagnostic distinction? Histopathology 2024 PMID: 39031756, DOI: 10.1111/his.15247.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPositive predictive valueTriploid gestationsPartial moleTrophoblastic hyperplasiaVillous sizeCistern formationHistological parametersPostmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasiaTriploid partial molesGenotype-phenotype correlation studiesGestational trophoblastic neoplasiaPartial hydatidiform moleModerate interobserver agreementVillous populationsTrophoblastic neoplasiaGestational weeksHydatidiform moleClinical presentationPatient ageDigynic triploidyAbnormal histologyInterobserver agreementGestationSyncytiotrophoblastHistological assessment
2013
Frequent KRAS mutation in complex mucinous epithelial lesions of the endometrium
Alomari A, Abi-Raad R, Buza N, Hui P. Frequent KRAS mutation in complex mucinous epithelial lesions of the endometrium. Modern Pathology 2013, 27: 675-680. PMID: 24186144, DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.186.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive predictive valueMucinous lesionsKRAS mutationsMucinous changeMucinous adenocarcinomaEndometrial mucinous carcinomaHigh positive predictive valueComplex atypical hyperplasiaRisk stratification algorithmAtypical complex hyperplasiaImportant prognostic indicatorFrequent KRAS mutationsKRAS mutation analysisComplex hyperplasiaHysterectomy specimensClinical progressionEndometrial lesionsMucinous carcinomaAtypical hyperplasiaPrognostic indicatorMucinous differentiationEpithelial lesionsCurettage casesStratification algorithmPredictive valuePartial Hydatidiform Mole
Buza N, Hui P. Partial Hydatidiform Mole. International Journal Of Gynecological Pathology 2013, 32: 307-315. PMID: 23518914, DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0b013e3182626011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVillous sizeVillous hydropsMorphologic featuresHigh positive predictive valueCases of PHMSignificant histologic overlapPositive predictive valuePopulations of villusPartial Hydatidiform MoleCistern formationRoutine workupGynecologic pathologistsVillus sizeDefinitive diagnosisHistologic diagnosisHistologic findingsAvailable hematoxylinHistologic overlapDNA genotypingHistologic parametersEosin slidesPredictive valueDiagnostic significanceChromosomal trisomiesTrophoblastic hyperplasia
2012
Comparing Two Methods of Detection for Chlamydia trachomatis in Liquid-Based Papanicolaou Tests
Levi AW, Beckman D, Hui P, Schofield K, Harigopal M, Chhieng DC. Comparing Two Methods of Detection for Chlamydia trachomatis in Liquid-Based Papanicolaou Tests. American Journal Of Clinical Pathology 2012, 138: 236-240. PMID: 22904135, DOI: 10.1309/ajcp2b7xqtcnamjp.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHC2 assayBD Viper SystemXTR TechnologyPositive predictive valueDNA assaysLiquid-based Papanicolaou testsNucleic acidsC trachomatisChlamydia trachomatisPredictive valueHybrid Capture 2Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactionChlamydia trachomatis testingTranscriptase-polymerase chain reactionViper SystemComparable specificityCapture 2Papanicolaou testChlamydial infectionCytology samplesMethod of detectionThinPrep specimensTrachomatisAssaysSensitivity rate