P-057 Comparative Efficacy of Cilta-Cel vs Approved Comparator Treatments for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma With 1–3 Prior Lines of Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
Mina R, Khan A, McClune B, Bar N, Caers J, Larsen J, Mendes J, Lee S, Benachour N, Chen D, Zhao M, Lonardi C, Slaughter A, Lengil T, Burnett H, Cichewicz A, Neupane B, Filho O, Dytfeld D, Sidana S. P-057 Comparative Efficacy of Cilta-Cel vs Approved Comparator Treatments for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma With 1–3 Prior Lines of Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s74. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)01960-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel versus idecabtagene vicleucel in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with 2–4 prior lines of therapy: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
Bar N, Diels J, van Sanden S, Mendes J, Hernando T, Burnett H, Cost P, Schecter J, Lendvai N, Patel N, Ishida T, Er J, Harrison S, Lopez-Muñoz N. Comparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel versus idecabtagene vicleucel in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with 2–4 prior lines of therapy: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Current Medical Research And Opinion 2024, 40: 1597-1603. PMID: 39129504, DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2391112.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRelapsed/refractory multiple myelomaEfficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucelIde-celProgression-free survivalCilta-celIdecabtagene vicleucelCiltacabtagene autoleucelMultiple myelomaTreated with 2Risk of disease progressionDistribution of prognostic factorsIndirect comparisonsRefractory multiple myelomaTreatment of patientsCox proportional hazards modelsMatching-adjusted indirect comparisonWeighted Cox proportional hazards modelsLogistic regression analysisProportional hazards modelCARTITUDE-1Partial responseTriple-classPrognostic factorsPatient-level dataClinical benefit