2003
The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners
Bell M, Hobbs B, Ellis H. The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2003, 37: 289-316. DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0121(02)00047-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchValue judgmentsIntegrated assessmentUnderstanding of tradeoffsGreenhouse gas emissionsInterest ratesPolicy tradeoffsHypothetical policyClimate change expertsEnergy policyMCDM methodsGas emissionsUncertainty caseCriteria decision making methodMulti-criteria decision-making methodTypes of impactsPolicyIA practitionersChange expertsClimate changeKey resultsDecision-making methodImpactFuture impactTradeoffImplications
2000
An Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods in Integrated Assessment of Climate Policy
Bell M, Hobbs B, Elliott E, Ellis H, Robinson Z. An Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods in Integrated Assessment of Climate Policy. Lecture Notes In Economics And Mathematical Systems 2000, 487: 228-237. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_19.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClimate change policyAlternative policiesClimate change expertsPolicy alternativesClimate policyChange policyPolicy decisionsPolicy makersMCDM methodsDifferent rankingsMulticriteria decision-making methodPolicyRange of criteriaIA analysisCriteria decision making methodIntegrated assessmentChange expertsDecision-making methodMakersDecision making methodDecisionsRankingUncertaintyGlobal warmingTradeoff