2023
Delirium in older adults after percutaneous coronary intervention: Prevalence, risks, and clinical phenotypes
Park D, Jamil Y, Hu J, Lowenstern A, Frampton J, Abdullah A, Damluji A, Ahmad Y, Soufer R, Nanna M. Delirium in older adults after percutaneous coronary intervention: Prevalence, risks, and clinical phenotypes. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2023, 57: 60-67. PMID: 37414611, PMCID: PMC10730763, DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionHospital mortalityHigher oddsOlder adultsHospital deliriumCoronary interventionAdverse health-related outcomesInpatient percutaneous coronary interventionNon-home dischargePeri-procedural settingAcute kidney injuryImpact of deliriumPost-procedural complicationsNational Inpatient SampleHealth-related outcomesDelirium preventionHospital complicationsMore comorbiditiesGastrointestinal hemorrhageKidney injuryAdverse eventsSecondary outcomesBlood transfusionPrimary outcomeIntracranial hemorrhage
2022
In-hospital outcomes and readmission in older adults treated with percutaneous coronary intervention for stable ischemic heart disease
Park DY, Hanna JM, Kadian S, Kadian M, Jones WS, Damluji AA, Kochar A, Curtis JP, Nanna MG. In-hospital outcomes and readmission in older adults treated with percutaneous coronary intervention for stable ischemic heart disease. Journal Of Geriatric Cardiology 2022, 19: 631-642. PMID: 36284680, PMCID: PMC9548058, DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.09.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchStable ischemic heart diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionInpatient percutaneous coronary interventionIschemic heart diseaseHospital mortalityOlder adultsIndex hospitalizationCoronary interventionHospital chargesHeart diseaseNational Readmission DatabaseTotal hospital chargesHigh-risk cohortOlder adult patientsPeriprocedural morbidityCardiovascular causesGastrointestinal hemorrhageHospital lengthHospital outcomesAdult patientsSecondary outcomesLonger LOSPrimary outcomeIntracranial hemorrhageProcedural risk
2019
A systematic review of randomized trials comparing double versus triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Sullivan AE, Nanna MG, Rao SV, Cantrell S, Gibson CM, Verheugt FWA, Peterson ED, Lopes RD, Alexander JH, Granger CB, Yee MK, Kong DF. A systematic review of randomized trials comparing double versus triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 96: e102-e109. PMID: 31713326, PMCID: PMC7211549, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28535.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCoronary ThrombosisDual Anti-Platelet TherapyFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHumansMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionAcute coronary syndromeDouble therapyOral anticoagulationAtrial fibrillationTriple therapyAntithrombotic therapyCoronary syndromeCoronary interventionStent thrombosisMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsTriple antithrombotic therapyAdverse cardiovascular eventsDual antiplatelet therapyOptimal antithrombotic therapyGood safety profileRandom-effects modelIschemic outcomesAntiplatelet therapyCardiovascular eventsP2Y12 inhibitorsMedical managementRandomized trialsIntracranial hemorrhageSafety profile