2024
Diagnostic utility of prostate health index density prior to MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy
Press B, Lokeshwar S, Webb L, Khajir G, Smani S, Olawoyin O, Gardezi M, Rahman S, Leapman M, Sprenkle P. Diagnostic utility of prostate health index density prior to MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy. Exploration Of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2024, 5: 1168-1176. PMID: 39465014, PMCID: PMC11502073, DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00269.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate Health IndexMRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsyClinically significant prostate cancerFusion targeted biopsyPI-RADS 1Gleason grade groupMagnetic resonance imagingPhi densityPI-RADSProstate specific-antigenProstate biopsyImproved detection of clinically significant prostate cancerDetection of clinically significant prostate cancerPHI testingProstate health index densityElevated prostate-specific antigenMRI-ultrasound fusionProstate Imaging ReportingSignificant prostate cancerProstate-specific antigenSelection of patientsDetection of PCaReceiver operating characteristic curveCombination of magnetic resonance imagingMultivariate logistic regressionRisk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy
Smani S, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Carbonella J, Brito J, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy. Exploration Of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2024, 5: 981-996. PMID: 39280242, PMCID: PMC11390291, DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason score upgradingProstate-specific antigenRisk factorsMagnetic resonance imagingRadical prostatectomyScore upgradingAssociated with Gleason score upgradingBiopsy to radical prostatectomyHigher-risk prostate cancerPatients treated with surgeryProstate magnetic resonance imagingClinically localized diseaseGleason grade groupLow-risk diseaseRecognition of risk factorsBody mass indexGleason upgradingFinal pathologyProstate volumeProstate biopsySource of diagnostic uncertaintyBiopsy coresLocalized diseaseProstate cancerInitial managementRISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 42: s79. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason Grade Group 1PI-RADS 5 lesionsPI-RADSProstate biopsyProstate cancerGleason upgradingRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate MRIMultivariate logistic regressionGrade Group 1 prostate cancerConversion to active treatmentOptimal management of patientsGrade group 1PI-RADS 5Gleason grade groupProstate Imaging ReportingDied of diseaseManagement of patientsLogistic regressionPrimary study outcomeAssociated with oddsMedian PSAMetastatic diseaseGrade diseaseAssociation between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
Kim I, Wang A, Corpuz G, Sprenkle P, Leapman M, Brito J, Renzulli J, Kim I. Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Prostate International 2024, 12: 70-78. PMID: 39036758, PMCID: PMC11255894, DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPelvic lymph node dissectionBenefit of pelvic lymph node dissectionGleason grade groupLymph node dissectionProstate cancer patientsRadical prostatectomyNode dissectionProstate cancer treated with radical prostatectomyCancer patientsAssociated with improved OSTime of radical prostatectomyGrade groupSurvival of prostate cancer patientsMedian PSA valuePre-operative characteristicsProstate cancer-specificTime of RPLog-rank testKaplan-Meier curvesPSA valuesSurvival benefitProstate cancerMedian ageClinical benefitCancer-specific
2018
National trends in the management of patients with positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Ghabili K, Nguyen K, Hsiang W, Syed J, Suarez-Sarmiento A, Shuch B, Park H, Yu J, Leapman M. National trends in the management of patients with positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2018, 36: 111-111. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.111.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdjuvant radiation therapyAndrogen deprivation therapyPositive surgical marginsNational Cancer DatabaseAdjuvant therapyRadical prostatectomyRadiation therapyProstate cancerPathologic featuresSurgical marginsAddition of ADTAdjuvant androgen deprivation therapyStudy periodPre-treatment PSAPrimary definitive treatmentMajority of patientsManagement of patientsGleason grade groupCourse of managementOptimal management approachNon-academic facilitiesLogistic regression modelsBinary logistic regression modelAnalysis menDeprivation therapy
2016
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes
Leapman MS, Cowan JE, Simko J, Roberge G, Stohr BA, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes. European Urology 2016, 71: 750-759. PMID: 27940155, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of PCSMGleason grade groupBone metastasesProstate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) registryGroup ICox proportional hazards modelGrade groupBone metastatic progressionGrade group IPrimary androgen deprivationPrognostic grade groupingKaplan-Meier methodProstate cancer outcomesProportional hazards modelGroup VProstate cancer pathologyNondefinitive therapyDefinitive therapyConservative managementUnadjusted riskAndrogen deprivationGleason sumGleason scoreCancer outcomesGrouping systemExternal validation of a prognostic Gleason grade classification system.
Leapman M, Cowan J, Roberge G, Eltemamy M, Simko J, Carroll P, Cooperberg M. External validation of a prognostic Gleason grade classification system. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 123-123. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.123.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate cancer-specific mortalityRisk of recurrenceGleason grade groupRadical prostatectomyAdjusted pairwise comparisonsGrade groupUCSF cohortGrade diseaseGleason 4Metastatic progressionCox proportional hazards modelGleason classification systemGrade classification systemImmediate radical prostatectomyCancer-specific mortalityAcademic referral centerHigh-grade diseaseIndependent prognostic abilityProportional hazards modelConsecutive PSA valuesDiscrimination of outcomesGleason grading systemGleason grade 3Salvage treatmentReferral center