2017
Standards for MRI reporting—the evolution to PI-RADS v 2.0
Spektor M, Mathur M, Weinreb JC. Standards for MRI reporting—the evolution to PI-RADS v 2.0. Translational Andrology And Urology 2017, 6: 355-367. PMID: 28725577, PMCID: PMC5503981, DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.01.02.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPI-RADS v2Prostate-specific antigenProstate cancerTransrectal ultrasoundSerum prostate-specific antigenMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingIndolent prostate cancerSignificant prostate cancerMagnetic resonance imagingConsensus guidelinesLeading causeMRI reportingResonance imagingLack of standardizationV 2.0Prostate imagingCauseVast majorityWide variationImagingProstateCancerData SystemAntigenDate information
2015
Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intraoperatively Confirmed Pelvic Adhesions
Macer ML, Mathur M, Spektor M, Gysler S, Staib L, Kodaman P, McCarthy S. Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intraoperatively Confirmed Pelvic Adhesions. Journal Of Computer Assisted Tomography 2015, 39: 896-900. PMID: 26466105, DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000302.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMagnetic resonance imagingPelvic adhesionsPositive predictive valuePredictive valueResonance imagingSpecificity of MRIGynecologic abdominal surgeryInstitutional review board-approved retrospective analysisNegative predictive valueAnterior culPosterior culAbdominal surgeryOperative reportsInclusion criteriaRetrospective analysisStudy populationBlinded specialistsMRI sensitivityPatientsImaging
2014
Utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of intraoperatively confirmed pelvic adhesions: a retrospective analysis
Macer M, Spektor M, Mathur M, Gysler S, McCarthy S, Kodaman P. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of intraoperatively confirmed pelvic adhesions: a retrospective analysis. Fertility And Sterility 2014, 102: e37. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.134.Peer-Reviewed Original Research